It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
A close ally of Vladimir Putin’s has issued a chilling warning on Russia’s state TV, saying London should be bombed first if World War Three happens.
Speaking on Russia’s propaganda machine, Channel 1, he said the only way to prevent the West from blockading Russian enclave Kalingrad is to invade the Baltic states.
Andrey Gurulyov, a member of Russia’s parliament’s defence committee, advocated the Russian invasion of Baltic countries during his segment.
If the move was to happen it would trigger Nato’s clause five and cause World War Three.
‘We’ll destroy the entire group of enemy’s space satellites during the first air operation,’ said the lieutenant-general, a senior commander who now represents United Russia, the main pro-Vladimir Putin political party.
originally posted by: Nexttimemaybe
Link?
originally posted by: DeathSlayer
It will not be bombed but gassed.
originally posted by: Silcone Synapse
a reply to: putnam6
Do you remember in school when there was a really big bully who was tougher than everyone else,all the lesser bullies would try to do tough things to get repect from the alpha bully..
This is what seems to be going on in Russia..
All Putin supporters are trying to be seen to be the biggest a55h0le to prove to daddy putin how tough they are.
Its pathetic and infantile,as all these fools know full well that if they nuke London or any western city,Russia would cease to exist.
Minsk agreement and Moscow agreement should be honoured not disrespected
From what I can understand what the crown is about, the privy council in the city of London advise the queen on the current situation.
If she is still alive?
Anyway, Prince Charles comes across as an idiot.
Having him as head of state, all this Ukraine nonsense fits.
Will Australia become a republic? One day perhaps?
As for Putin nuking London, can see an argument for it.
Not sure how I would respond?