Russell Brand love or hate him WHO says COVID may have come from Wuhan Lab

Here Brand is skewering the dismissal of Wuhan as the source so early on, and now WHO is saying it is possible. Funny how they didn't let that seep out immediately and if you did you were called racists. He goes further about it being dismissed because they likely knew exactly what was going on.

originally posted by: putnam6
Here Brand is skewering the dismissal of Wuhan as the source so early on, and now WHO is saying it is possible. Funny how they didn't let that seep out immediately and if you did you were called racists. He goes further about it being dismissed because they likely knew exactly what was going on.

Be careful with him, he was far left until he realised he had a bigger audience with the right. Just saying.

a reply to: putnam6

If only there had been people trying to point this out over two years ago.

Imagine that.

a reply to: putnam6

Lancet Finally Publishes COVID Lab-Leak Information, Arguing No Direct Evidence For Natural Origins

www.abovetopsecret.com...


Yeah, Pretty much have known that since 2020.

Chinese scientists say COVID-19/coronavirus could have originated from government

Feb 16, 2020

originally posted by: someolddog

originally posted by: putnam6
Here Brand is skewering the dismissal of Wuhan as the source so early on, and now WHO is saying it is possible. Funny how they didn't let that seep out immediately and if you did you were called racists. He goes further about it being dismissed because they likely knew exactly what was going on.

Be careful with him, he was far left until he realised he had a bigger audience with the right. Just saying.

Im well aware thus the title love him or hate him, besides better late than never and it perhaps takes a whackjob like Brand to convince some of the blind loyalists of the current DNC monarchy.

Lastly, did you watch it? and do you agree or disagree?

originally posted by: someolddog

originally posted by: putnam6
Here Brand is skewering the dismissal of Wuhan as the source so early on, and now WHO is saying it is possible. Funny how they didn't let that seep out immediately and if you did you were called racists. He goes further about it being dismissed because they likely knew exactly what was going on.

Be careful with him, he was far left until he realised he had a bigger audience with the right. Just saying.

If the info is accurate then I don't think it matters.

a reply to: putnam6

I actually believe that given the evidence the Virus most definitely DID originate within the Wuhan Laboratory.

I also believe that STATES around the world need to make there own investigation - independent - or review and if they find evidence that it DID come from the Wuhan Laboratory and that it was linked to the Chinese Government weaponizing the virus then they should make an assessment for Damages to there economy and to the lives of there people.

Then a group of these states should then take this to the international courts of Justice and bring charges against China and claim those damages if successful FROM China, Either China Pay's up or they seize assets or default LEGALLY on any loans that China has given them to the same value as the Damage to there people and Economy's have suffered.

IF China then implicated Fauci and his crowd over in the US and perhaps any international link's that can be traced to the governments of those nations the Financial burden should then be SHARED among the guilty party's.

Letting them get away with it is an even greater recipe for Disaster as without consequences the world WILL face a far more deadly artificial pandemic, no if's or but's but WILL.

originally posted by: LABTECH767
a reply to: putnam6

I actually believe that given the evidence the Virus most definitely DID originate within the Wuhan Laboratory.

I also believe that STATES around the world need to make there own investigation - independent - or review and if they find evidence that it DID come from the Wuhan Laboratory and that it was linked to the Chinese Government weaponizing the virus then they should make an assessment for Damages to there economy and to the lives of there people.

Then a group of these states should then take this to the international courts of Justice and bring charges against China and claim those damages if successful FROM China, Either China Pay's up or they seize assets or default LEGALLY on any loans that China has given them to the same value as the Damage to there people and Economy's have suffered.

IF China then implicated Fauci and his crowd over in the US and perhaps any international link's that can be traced to the governments of those nations the Financial burden should then be SHARED among the guilty party's.

Letting them get away with it is an even greater recipe for Disaster as without consequences the world WILL face a far more deadly artificial pandemic, no if's or but's but WILL.

!00% agree...

Brand alluded to it, it may have been hushed because we funded the damn experiment, and Fauci knew it.

originally posted by: someolddog

Be careful with him, he was far left until he realised he had a bigger audience with the right. Just saying.

TBF to Brandy,he did a vid where he talked about how mad it was that people saw him as a right winger,as hes always been more of a flat out hippy leftie.
He found it mad that todays left wing has become so rabid corrupt and unhinged,that by him mentioning those facts he magically became right wing and hated in the eyes of todays neo left.

Really if you look past the guru persona,Brand is someone who is good at using comedy to call out BS-he has laid out a lot of the wuhan/dasak/NiH/faucci/gates connections/cover ups quite well since the pandemic to an audience who may otherwise not have made some of the connections.

originally posted by: Silcone Synapse

originally posted by: someolddog

Be careful with him, he was far left until he realised he had a bigger audience with the right. Just saying.

TBF to Brandy,he did a vid where he talked about how mad it was that people saw him as a right winger,as hes always been more of a flat out hippy leftie.
He found it mad that todays left wing has become so rabid corrupt and unhinged,that by him mentioning those facts he magically became right wing and hated in the eyes of todays neo left.

Really if you look past the guru persona,Brand is someone who is good at using comedy to call out BS-he has laid out a lot of the wuhan/dasak/NiH/faucci/gates connections/cover ups quite well since the pandemic to an audience who may otherwise not have made some of the connections.

You worded that very much more succinctly than I ever could have, and that's thing if you see somebody dissing Brand they likely lean to neo-left, as you aptly put it. But the good thing is it hopefully will change some of the moderate left and we can hopefully make some progress.

He’s a great orator and he got to bang Katy Perry 💪

Left or right it doesn’t matter, he’s been spot on the money from the start.

MR

Well we know the WHO will say whatever China tells them to say , so why would they say this?

Unless its to keep eyes off of BIO labs in another country..

originally posted by: someolddog

originally posted by: putnam6
Here Brand is skewering the dismissal of Wuhan as the source so early on, and now WHO is saying it is possible. Funny how they didn't let that seep out immediately and if you did you were called racists. He goes further about it being dismissed because they likely knew exactly what was going on.

Be careful with him, he was far left until he realised he had a bigger audience with the right. Just saying.

"A neoconservative is a liberal who's been mugged by reality. A neoliberal is a liberal who's been mugged by reality but has refused to press charges." - Irving Kristol

a reply to: putnam6

Embedded for those who want to watch.

originally posted by: gortex
a reply to: putnam6

Embedded for those who want to watch.

Thanks, I don't know how I screwed up the link, I look like a newbie

originally posted by: someolddog

originally posted by: putnam6
Here Brand is skewering the dismissal of Wuhan as the source so early on, and now WHO is saying it is possible. Funny how they didn't let that seep out immediately and if you did you were called racists. He goes further about it being dismissed because they likely knew exactly what was going on.

Be careful with him, he was far left until he realised he had a bigger audience with the right. Just saying.

I would have never described him as FAR left but left yes. But like many rational left leaning people there was no choice but to lean right as their values are not represented by the modern left.


Also lets not forget that you get rejected by the left if you are not extreme enough. No wait, i meant Loving enough of course. The summer of love people.