Muslim call to prayer arrives to Minneapolis soundscape

originally posted by: Annee
a reply to: tanstaafl
Elliot's Debate - Jonathan Elliot: after Elliot's death. It has long been criticized for its haphazard and biased editing, and it has been rendered obsolete by the Documentary History of the Ratification of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, 1787-1791, . . . en.wikipedia.org...(historian)

I get it -- it says what you want to hear.

Sorry, that is wikipedia you're talking about. Back then, people said what they meany and meant what they said.

What does any of this have to do with the OP/subject of this thread?

Muslim call to prayer arrives to Minneapolis soundscape

originally posted by: tanstaafl

originally posted by: Annee
a reply to: tanstaafl
Elliot's Debate - Jonathan Elliot: after Elliot's death. It has long been criticized for its haphazard and biased editing, and it has been rendered obsolete by the Documentary History of the Ratification of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, 1787-1791, . . . en.wikipedia.org...(historian)

I get it -- it says what you want to hear.

Sorry, that is wikipedia you're talking about. Back then, people said what they meany and meant what they said.

What does any of this have to do with the OP/subject of this thread?

Muslim call to prayer arrives to Minneapolis soundscape

So what if its Wikipedia -- the info is correct. Must be fake because you don't like it.

How do you know what was meant/said back then? Just look at the 2nd amendment. Still no one knows exactly what it means.

Again -- this has nothing to do with the OP.

originally posted by: Annee
a reply to: tanstaafl
So what if its Wikipedia -- the info is correct.

Maybe, but you have yet to prove it - and citing a wikipedia article posting content from a propaganda website doesn't prove anything. Of course you know this, but that's all you got...

Yes, wikipedia gets some things right on occasion - and a broken clock is right twice a day.

But anyone who knows anything about reality knows that wikipedia is extraordinarily left leaning and heavily censored to allow only approved content when it comes to the radical left narrative.

Again -- this has nothing to do with the OP.

I understand that you have no argument

a reply to: tanstaafl

I'm aware that anything the Right doesn't agree with is Fake or Propaganda.

originally posted by: Annee
a reply to: tanstaafl

I'm aware that anything the Right doesn't agree with is Fake or Propaganda.

I'm aware that you believe nonsensical fantasies.

originally posted by: vonclod
Freedom of religion, which I have no use for any, but this wouldn't bother me, it's a right.

Amplified speech is not freedom of religion, it's called disturbing the peace. An officer's peace can not be disturbed. Therefore, an officer will need to have a complainant willing to sign a citation.

originally posted by: Echo007

originally posted by: vonclod
Freedom of religion, which I have no use for any, but this wouldn't bother me, it's a right.

Amplified speech is not freedom of religion, it's called disturbing the peace. An officer's peace can not be disturbed. Therefore, an officer will need to have a complainant willing to sign a citation.

Again -- as does Christian bell ringing -- disturb the peace..

a reply to: tanstaafl

That post is off topic.