A solution to school shootings

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: PatriotGames4u

Maybe I could be convinced. However, right now, its infringement plain and simple.

In even a slightly less than perfect world I shouldnt have to prove my innocence.

Our govt had no issue or oversight sending automatic arms to civilians in other countries. While in the same breath demonizing lesser firearms here at home that we have a right to bear.

I was mostly joking around there ('live'), I don't have any idea what the complete solution is yet, but I do know it starts with undoing what the By Any Means party did in the 90s, because the schools have to be first.

Like first day in office first.

Then we can hash out the best path forward on the rest, and that path shall not infringe.

a reply to: PatriotGames4u

Its a nice thought but history has shown that those congress critters arent going to do anything. Same with abortion, debt etc etc.

To them, its all just fodder to run and bank on.

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: PatriotGames4u

Its a nice thought but history has shown that those congress critters arent going to do anything. Same with abortion, debt etc etc.

To them, its all just fodder to run and bank on.

See 1860.

2024 = 1860.

Complete control.

(Not referring to violence or war)



Any critter that dares to play By Any Means games will see the immediate laser focus of a hundred million.

a reply to: PatriotGames4u

No idea what youre trying to convey.

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: PatriotGames4u

No idea what youre trying to convey.

61 & 218 means our critters control 100% of our government, and the By Any Means critters have zero say on anything at all.

Complete control.



61 & 218 also means we 100% control our critters.

Zero excuses are available.

Zero exceptions.




We faced exactly the same challenges for 70 years while trying to solve the slavery problem.

The political challenges (not the issue of course) we faced for those 70 years were remarkably similar in MANY ways.

We got the modern equivalent of 61 & 218 in 1860, meaning we controlled our critters and our critters controlled the government, and a 5000 year old impossible problem was resolved in the blink of an eye.

Unfortunately that one cost a whole lot of American lives because the By Any Means party really meant it and immediately started a civil war.

They have no such ability this time.





Note: The By Any Means party really did mean it and murdered Lincoln before he could finish the job, and unfortunately that resulted in those freed slaves being treated pretty horribly for the next century.

We now have the Secret Service (as a direct result of what democrats did to Lincoln at Ford Theater) to keep the By Any Means party from going mad and thinking it's Necessary again.

originally posted by: Subaeruginosa
a reply to: Vroomfondel

I can’t help but feel like it would have a negative psychological effect on young kids (especially), being taught by mrs Jones who has to be strapped with a glock… just as a constant reminder to them that some crazy person could break down the door and start shooting up the classroom at any moment.

Honestly, at the end of the day, I feel like this Uvalde school massacre would’ve never have happened if there was a federal regulation as simple as saying that people under 21 need at least 2 references from family members to qualify for purchasing a firearm.

Such a simple thing and it wouldn’t even infringe on any grown adults right to bear arms.

And I can't help but think that this massacre could have been avoided if the door had been locked as it should have been.

a reply to: network dude



found this while surfing

a reply to: stonerwilliam


Go to bed Alex, you're hallucinating again.

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: Subaeruginosa
a reply to: Vroomfondel

I can’t help but feel like it would have a negative psychological effect on young kids (especially), being taught by mrs Jones who has to be strapped with a glock… just as a constant reminder to them that some crazy person could break down the door and start shooting up the classroom at any moment.

Honestly, at the end of the day, I feel like this Uvalde school massacre would’ve never have happened if there was a federal regulation as simple as saying that people under 21 need at least 2 references from family members to qualify for purchasing a firearm.

Such a simple thing and it wouldn’t even infringe on any grown adults right to bear arms.

And I can't help but think that this massacre could have been avoided if the door had been locked as it should have been.

Or he would’ve just smashed a window and jumped though. Doubt he was going to just call it a day and go home, once he realized the doors were locked.

originally posted by: Vroomfondel

In some states it doesn't matter who is selling and who is buying, the transfer has to be done in a licensed gun store. The forms have to be filled out and signed just as if you were purchasing from a brick and mortar store. The licensed intermediary is responsible for filing the transfer of ownership with the state. It is also a good idea for the seller and buyer to get a signed bill of sale with the sn on it. The seller should keep that for a minimum of ten years after the sale. If the firearm is used in the commission of a crime and you don't have a bill of sale for it, you become the prime suspect.

I agree 100%. I was talking more about the lowest requirements scenario that one may come up on in some states, but it still puts a lot of responsibility on the seller even in those situations.

So once again what do the libs want to add to it? Who knows... I think it is all BS narrative with nothing below the surface.

originally posted by: Xtrozero

originally posted by: Vroomfondel

In some states it doesn't matter who is selling and who is buying, the transfer has to be done in a licensed gun store. The forms have to be filled out and signed just as if you were purchasing from a brick and mortar store. The licensed intermediary is responsible for filing the transfer of ownership with the state. It is also a good idea for the seller and buyer to get a signed bill of sale with the sn on it. The seller should keep that for a minimum of ten years after the sale. If the firearm is used in the commission of a crime and you don't have a bill of sale for it, you become the prime suspect.

I agree 100%. I was talking more about the lowest requirements scenario that one may come up on in some states, but it still puts a lot of responsibility on the seller even in those situations.

So once again what do the libs want to add to it? Who knows... I think it is all BS narrative with nothing below the surface.

Probably something to do with the color?

They seem to have a problem with black firearms.

originally posted by: Vroomfondel
a reply to: everyone

London actually passed New York city in murder per 100k people, and it was done mostly with knives. Guess what the solution proposed by the liberal government was...ban knives of course. Next will be pointy sticks, rocks, pipes and 2x4's, cricket bats, whatever. Heaven forbid they focus on the people who do this stuff instead of the tools they use...

Exactly that. Its a insanely ridiculous "solution". for anyone who wathced the video i posted about it. It mentions that 70% of the knifes used are kitchen knifes. So what do they propose, to ban kitchen knifes? How about they actually punish the perpetrators for a chance instead of constantly letting them walk free or a slap on the wrist but nope, They show zero incentive on that as i shown in one of my previous posts in this thread.

The clown world is real. Fake, they are all fake. All talk no walk and doing the exact oposite on the talks they sell throug media. And they get people to follow it and agree with it.

But hey what are we gonna do about it. They know that 50% of the worlds population has a IQ under 70 so it works, for them.

originally posted by: Vroomfondel
a reply to: TDDAgain

I agree. The first answer I found involving an armed presence at the schools was to arm the teachers. But as I stated, many of then are devout liberals and do not want to have anything to do with guns. And even those who might be open to the idea probably aren't the best first line defense against an armed aggressor. Hence the suggestion of hiring swat or former military.

We can already not trust these rainbow teachers around our kids witouth them carrying weapons. They already damaged our kids with their perverted ideas. They are unstable, very unstable even, they are not even fit to be teachers to begin with. No i would not want them to be carrying guns in schools. School shootings would rise by 50% within a month i garantee it.

originally posted by: Xtrozero
a reply to: Vroomfondel

Republicans in the House want to push a bill to establish best practices at the federal level for all schools. They would look at what works the best and push to to all schools as a standard, but Schumer wouldn't even let it go to the floor saying it would mean more guns in schools. Its like the left wants mass shootings in schools to continue.

To me its obvious that they do as they use it to push their agenda. Just look at Obamas latest tweet which demonstrates this perfectly.


"Never let a good crisis go to waste" -Democrats
So lets create them so we can abuse them.

originally posted by: everyone

To me its obvious that they do as they use it to push their agenda. Just look at Obamas latest tweet which demonstrates this perfectly.


"Never let a good crisis go to waste" -Democrats
So lets create them so we can abuse them.

What would the dems have if they didn't have the abortion and gun agenda? Not much of anything, as those two things are their pride and joy every election year and here we are with both right back in the spot light, like purposely on clue.

originally posted by: everyone

Exactly that. Its a insanely ridiculous "solution". for anyone who wathced the video i posted about it. It mentions that 70% of the knifes used are kitchen knifes. So what do they propose, to ban kitchen knifes? How about they actually punish the perpetrators for a chance instead of constantly letting them walk free or a slap on the wrist but nope, They show zero incentive on that as i shown in one of my previous posts in this thread.

The clown world is real. Fake, they are all fake. All talk no walk and doing the exact oposite on the talks they sell throug media. And they get people to follow it and agree with it.

But hey what are we gonna do about it. They know that 50% of the worlds population has a IQ under 70 so it works, for them.

If we ban guns the desire to kill doesn't just do away. A truck during lunch hour on a sidewalk would put a gun to shame as the hell it would cause.

originally posted by: PatriotGames4u
Probably something to do with the color?

They seem to have a problem with black firearms.

They are scary....

I want to slap Whoopi every time she opens her mouth about guns...

originally posted by: network dude

And I can't help but think that this massacre could have been avoided if the door had been locked as it should have been.

Do the math... 13 mass murders at schools where 4 or more people were killed in the last 50+ years, this one was number 13. There are 190,000 schools in America so what is the chances of any one getting hit ever? Pretty freaken low no matter how horrendous it is. In this case we had a lot of failures to include a door left open wide just when a crazy guy with an AR was running from the cops, but lets add he was outside of the school for like 15 mins after he crashed...WTF was all that about. Add the HUGE delays to enter and take him out that took a random border patrol guy to do it finally.

Its like no longer a gun discussion with all that....

originally posted by: Subaeruginosa

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: Subaeruginosa
a reply to: Vroomfondel

I can’t help but feel like it would have a negative psychological effect on young kids (especially), being taught by mrs Jones who has to be strapped with a glock… just as a constant reminder to them that some crazy person could break down the door and start shooting up the classroom at any moment.

Honestly, at the end of the day, I feel like this Uvalde school massacre would’ve never have happened if there was a federal regulation as simple as saying that people under 21 need at least 2 references from family members to qualify for purchasing a firearm.

Such a simple thing and it wouldn’t even infringe on any grown adults right to bear arms.

And I can't help but think that this massacre could have been avoided if the door had been locked as it should have been.

Or he would’ve just smashed a window and jumped though. Doubt he was going to just call it a day and go home, once he realized the doors were locked.

so no door or window locks are needed, ever. Got it. DERP.

originally posted by: Xtrozero

originally posted by: network dude

And I can't help but think that this massacre could have been avoided if the door had been locked as it should have been.

Do the math... 13 mass murders at schools where 4 or more people were killed in the last 50+ years, this one was number 13. There are 190,000 schools in America so what is the chances of any one getting hit ever? Pretty freaken low no matter how horrendous it is. In this case we had a lot of failures to include a door left open wide just when a crazy guy with an AR was running from the cops, but lets add he was outside of the school for like 15 mins after he crashed...WTF was all that about. Add the HUGE delays to enter and take him out that took a random border patrol guy to do it finally.

Its like no longer a gun discussion with all that....

no, there are some really daunting questions that need to be answered here. If I was a conspiracy person, I'd wonder if he acted alone.