It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

NASA ‘confirms’ it’s joining search for UFOs

page: 3
19
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 29 2022 @ 03:15 AM
link   
a reply to: Mantiss2021

I forgot to add in a previous reply that the logical way for NASA to join the "search" for UFOs is simply to equip military jets and commercial airliners with a scrolling bulletin board on their fuselages simply telling the UFO occupants either "F-O-L-L-O-W--M-E" or to call NASA and provide a NASA 800 #, toll free!

This on the fuselage, it'll get their attention!



posted on May, 29 2022 @ 04:02 AM
link   

originally posted by: JimOberg

originally posted by: Ophiuchus1
"As if they don’t already know 😉
👽🛸🍺


What exactly is it that you think NASA 'knows' about UFOs, based on what evidence?


Based on how governments operate around the world.

How tight nit authorities are with what the masses are allowed to know or believe...

the many missing persons who disappear then show up later under impossible survival conditions yet no memory of it or reasoning for the disappearance.

The many sightings of crafts doing impossible speeds, going in and out of the oceans.

The break neck speed technology develops even today.

The fact that we cannot see a universe teeming with space craft.

The amazing gifts man has of altering our realities via thought yet we are simply animals with self-awareness and thumbs.

Having abilities to adapt to many extremely deadly environments and thrive.

Nuclear reactors created by a teenage boy at home... [this tech advancement reels in ufo attention, yet a teenager can create it at home].

All of this could best be explained as evidence that e.t. actually runs everything, including thought. And thought is mankind's greatest asset.

We are being genetically modified and can't stop.



posted on May, 29 2022 @ 04:47 AM
link   

originally posted by: JimOberg

originally posted by: chunder


That based on evidence provided by the military there are some unknowns flying around that warrant investigation.

It isn't rocket science.



Investigation is an appropriate response. When do you plan to start?


I have no idea what your response means - the topic is NASA investigating not me.

I do investigate in my own way and have been for over 3 decades - albeit with significantly less resources and information than is available to the US military and NASA. Despite that I reckon I have at least as much an idea about what is going on then they do.

Appreciate that you have been doing your own investigations, which has been valuable in identifying a number of reported sightings, but as I have said before you enter into that from a pre-disposed position which in all of your published work is vindicated. Maybe one day (if you haven't already) you'll come across something that can't be explained - I guess I have been fortunate in that respect - and you will then be more open to there actually being something behind the phenomena as we aren't all basing our thoughts on the back of footage of ice particles.



posted on May, 29 2022 @ 10:39 AM
link   

originally posted by: chunder
,... Maybe one day (if you haven't already) you'll come across something that can't be explained - I guess I have been fortunate in that respect - and you will then be more open to there actually being something behind the phenomena as we aren't all basing our thoughts on the back of footage of ice particles.


I am baffled by Kovalenok's sighting from Salyut in 1981, he thinks it was some sort of top secret 'human experiment' but WHICH country remains unknown [smart money is on Israel].

www.jamesoberg.com...

It's true I focus on the specific cases which look like missile and space activity, I figure my professional experience in that career field gives me some helpful insight.

The wider implications of this limited subset of cases seem to be that respected investigators whose expertise we rely on to verify OTHER types of cases as 'unexplainable' have almost unanimously bungled this particular category. While it still might be arguable that their work on OTHER categories of cases is enormously more effective and accurate, I'm inclined to doubt it. But that's just a guess.



posted on May, 29 2022 @ 10:43 PM
link   

originally posted by: game over man
a reply to: nugget1

Massive money maker? What are you talking about....the top grossing movies, TV shows, books, magazines, music have nothing to do with the Roswell crash. Massive money maker LMAO.


You've never watched any of the many alien films about UFO crashes and invasions that grew out of the Roswell incident? Wow! How about the hundreds and hundreds of books that have been created and expanded upon the Roswell?

The Roswell UFO Festival held at Saucer City in June each year generates $5 million annually, so I'm not sure what you are 'LYAO' about.
edit on 70000001010America/Chicago311 by nugget1 because: sp



posted on May, 30 2022 @ 01:28 AM
link   
a reply to: Ophiuchus1

I have to accept with a heavy heart that James Oberg doesn't deem my replies worthy of replies. I'm saddened.



posted on May, 30 2022 @ 01:42 AM
link   
True to the acronym NASA….

Never A Straight Answer IF you can even get an answer

He’s a Company Man through and through

👽🛸🍸
edit on 30-5-2022 by Ophiuchus1 because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 30 2022 @ 01:43 AM
link   
a reply to: Ophiuchus1

Correct me if I'm wrong here, but in a nutshell, this means NASA will funnel any (serious) findings straight to a SAP. This seems like business as usual where the public argue over obscure, leftover crumbs. It should be positive news that NASA officially is stepping into the fray but it seems clear that we'll not be getting anything juicy anytime soon.



posted on May, 30 2022 @ 01:44 AM
link   
a reply to: Ophiuchus1

Is it NASA who moves the camera, or turns off the video feed, whenever a UFO appears in the background?

If so, NASA already knows.

How dumb do they think we are?



posted on May, 30 2022 @ 01:57 AM
link   

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: Ophiuchus1

Is it NASA who moves the camera, or turns off the video feed, whenever a UFO appears in the background?


Yeah …… I’m pretty sure it’s NASA……..and I’m almost certain it’s one of these push button switches……I t-h-I-n-k



👽🛸🍺🥴



posted on May, 30 2022 @ 02:02 AM
link   
a reply to: Ophiuchus1

I sincerely hope that's a really old photo.

It's somewhat disconcerting that the NASA control personnel went on strike. The screens on the wall indicate several potential collisions in progress.




posted on May, 30 2022 @ 03:20 PM
link   
a reply to: Ophiuchus1

"I’m almost certain it’s one of these push button switches……I t-h-I-n-k"

See the ashtrays? Isn't that a clue? [grin]



posted on May, 30 2022 @ 03:23 PM
link   

originally posted by: carewemust
I sincerely hope that's a really old photo.


Good eye. Note the ashtrays.

It's a more-or-less current photo of the old Apollo flight control room, restored recently, that they show tourists [from behind a glass wall].

Don't tell Ophiuchus, he t h i n k s it's a modern one.



posted on May, 30 2022 @ 03:27 PM
link   

originally posted by: carewemust
... Is it NASA who moves the camera, or turns off the video feed, whenever a UFO appears in the background?
If so, NASA already knows. How dumb do they think we are?


I'll pass on the last question.

In the real world [and OFF of it], live space video feeds are regularly cut off as relay satellites move out of line-of-sight, several times per hour. And the idea that there's a NASA dweeb with a finger on a 'kill switch' who ALWAYS hits it too late is just laughable. The NASA Mission Control team is always 'leaning forward' to detect external visual anomalies as clues to potential problems, even potential threats to the mission and the crew, that the whole team needs to focus on, so as to diagnose and determine the level of actual danger -- putting the lid on such indicators, hiding them, would be irresponsible, it could kill people.

See www.nasa.gov...
edit on 30-5-2022 by JimOberg because: add link



posted on May, 30 2022 @ 03:29 PM
link   
You don’t think I’ve seen dozens of photos new and old online……?

I picked one in your Era….

Apparently you don’t know how to, or read into the photo, …Nostalgia…when you see it.

Your getting old Jimmy…. Your shelf life is almost expired.

👽🛸🍺🥴
edit on 30-5-2022 by Ophiuchus1 because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 30 2022 @ 03:35 PM
link   
a reply to: Ophiuchus1

Whose research on 'NASA UFO secrets' do you find most trustworthy [just curious].

What do you think the Apollo-11 crew secretly encountered on their mission?



posted on May, 30 2022 @ 03:42 PM
link   

originally posted by: JimOberg

originally posted by: Ophiuchus1
"As if they don’t already know 😉
👽🛸🍺


What exactly is it that you think NASA 'knows' about UFOs, based on what evidence?



the absence of evidence is not evidence of absence


can you prove to me that they don't know something or have footage of some anomalous phenomena they tucked away from the public?

other than statements.

of course not.


what would suffice as proof for you?

as a group we do not have any sort of security clearance, there is no way i believe NASA doesnt have or even received images or video from other agencies of anomalies in space.

a top secret satellite or military project that would need to be 'suppressed' and due to the inherent secrecy afforded to secret or higher programs would mean that it would remain an unknown and unanswered by NASA for obvious reasons.

so in that case it would remain an unknown if it was seen by the public.

i believe that they have images of things at the time they could not or would not explain, it would be strange if they didnt.


unless you are saying NASA can put a label/explanation on everything they have documented.



posted on May, 30 2022 @ 03:46 PM
link   
a reply to: JimOberg

Benefit of the doubt, I give to you…….perhaps you didn’t have your glasses on…..

So here’s a repost you keep avoiding.

….”Jimmy, in my post of course I was being facetious and sarcastic……..but to the pointed question…..you failed to directly answer it…..it was

“What’s your take on NASA throwing in the towel……based on the articles sourced in the OP?

Instead you addressed the often debated VHS footage statement.

How about …..stop avoiding the question now ….. and answer it…. Enquiring Minds Want To Know…Mr. NASA.

What’s your take “James Edward Oberg” on NASA throwing in the towel……based on the articles sourced in the OP?”…….


I don’t want answers about personalities……I want to know what “YOU” feel about it.

More than a one sentence response from a UFO skeptic in the field of all things NASA would be fine. Otherwise don’t ask me questions if you can’t answer mine.

👽🛸🍺
edit on 30-5-2022 by Ophiuchus1 because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 30 2022 @ 04:49 PM
link   

originally posted by: nugget1

originally posted by: game over man
a reply to: nugget1

Massive money maker? What are you talking about....the top grossing movies, TV shows, books, magazines, music have nothing to do with the Roswell crash. Massive money maker LMAO.


You've never watched any of the many alien films about UFO crashes and invasions that grew out of the Roswell incident? Wow! How about the hundreds and hundreds of books that have been created and expanded upon the Roswell?

The Roswell UFO Festival held at Saucer City in June each year generates $5 million annually, so I'm not sure what you are 'LYAO' about.


Just because a movie is about aliens doesn't mean it's inspired from Roswell...There's actually never been a Roswell movie and gosh it has potential to be an incredible movie.

Where do you get that stat of $5 million each year? I did some research and the first festival started in 1996 and a festival in 2019 had 15,000 people in attendance....but nothing said generating $5 million...in what? Sales, profit, donations, cost?



posted on May, 30 2022 @ 05:19 PM
link   
a reply to: Ophiuchus1

Just curious. That red telephone on the desk there, was that used as a hotline to the president or the CIA director?

But seriously, I would love to go on a tour there.







 
19
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join