Dr. Campbell's Vaccine Injury Update With Kyle

originally posted by: nugget1
There are thousands of people who have had reactions to the vaccine, most within the first week or two, but plenty whose symptoms hit 1-3 months after their shot

The Israeli study showed 0 cases of heart inflammation that began 1-3 months after the second shot. That study included over 2.4 million people. 94 Percent of whom were double vaxxed.

There are a small number of cases where people had blood clots, and then died 1-3 months after the vax, but they were sick well before that.

a reply to: AaarghZombies
When was that Israeli study done?
I can't see your signature.....so would you mind providing a link please?

originally posted by: MichiganSwampBuck

originally posted by: AaarghZombies
a reply to: v1rtu0s0

Israeli study debunks this. Symptoms generally appear within 3 days. His were over a month later.

He's also 29, which would put him outside the primary grouping.

So any long term adverse reactions are out of the question then? That includes even a handful of possible cases in the months following the injections?

When it comes to heart problems, there are no long term reactions. Reactions happen within the first week of the second shot or not at all.

Seems you like to marginalize people who may have long lasting problems.

There's a difference between a "long lasting" problem, and a problem that occurs a long time after the shot. The Israeli study found that reactions happened within a set time frame or not at all.

an Israel study" doesn't address any long term reactions.

It didn't find any, period. You can't address what isn't there.

you need some empathy for your fellow humans.

If he trips and hits his head I'll empathise with him. If he trips and hits his head, and then blames the vax, not so much.

originally posted by: AaarghZombies

originally posted by: nugget1
There are thousands of people who have had reactions to the vaccine, most within the first week or two, but plenty whose symptoms hit 1-3 months after their shot

The Israeli study showed 0 cases of heart inflammation that began 1-3 months after the second shot. That study included over 2.4 million people. 94 Percent of whom were double vaxxed.

How many cases of heart inflammation did your Israeli study state that started 2 weeks after the second shot?

originally posted by: Itisnowagain
a reply to: AaarghZombies
When was that Israeli study done?
I can't see your signature.....so would you mind providing a link please?

Seriously?

This is link has been posted so many times, you want me to hold your hand while you go to the bathroom as well, should I link you to the Google Homepage as well?

Link

originally posted by: Itisnowagain

originally posted by: AaarghZombies

originally posted by: nugget1
There are thousands of people who have had reactions to the vaccine, most within the first week or two, but plenty whose symptoms hit 1-3 months after their shot

The Israeli study showed 0 cases of heart inflammation that began 1-3 months after the second shot. That study included over 2.4 million people. 94 Percent of whom were double vaxxed.

How many cases of heart inflammation did your Israeli study state that started 2 weeks after the second shot?

a reply to: AaarghZombies

The highest incidence of myocarditis (10.69 cases per 100,000 persons; 95% CI, 6.93 to 14.46) was reported in male patients between the ages of 16 and 29 years.

So Kyle being 29 was not outside the age bracket then.

originally posted by: AaarghZombies

originally posted by: PraetorianAZ

originally posted by: AaarghZombies
a reply to: v1rtu0s0

Israeli study debunks this. Symptoms generally appear within 3 days. His were over a month later.

He's also 29, which would put him outside the primary grouping.

There is it folks the one Doctor who matters has spoken. Go ahead and close this thread and call the OP and guy in the video a liar.

There is no way the vaccine injured this guy because "symptoms GENERALLY appear within 3 days. His were over a month later. He's also 29, which would put him outside the primary grouping."

Its solved everyone he's 29 so it cant be real

"Generally" 3 days, "Sometimes" as much as 5 day.

He's right on the outlying age range, way out of the time range, and he has some funky symptoms that simply don't match up with known cases.

Occam's razor, he doesn't resemble any known case, or even any known edge case, so he's not a case.

New studies have come along that makes your obsolete. Also, the conflict of interest is off the charts.

There are new studies that show that spike from the vaccine persists in the body for months, and in the video they mention finding it for almost a year. Kyle still has issues even after the spike is gone, so the "vaxx" doesn't have to be in your body any longer to continue to cause everlasting damage.

originally posted by: AaarghZombies

originally posted by: nugget1
There are thousands of people who have had reactions to the vaccine, most within the first week or two, but plenty whose symptoms hit 1-3 months after their shot

The Israeli study showed 0 cases of heart inflammation that began 1-3 months after the second shot. That study included over 2.4 million people. 94 Percent of whom were double vaxxed.

There are a small number of cases where people had blood clots, and then died 1-3 months after the vax, but they were sick well before that.

Most people here have uncovered tons of evidence where numbers have been manipulated to present a completely false picture; data has been falsified or eliminated. There are thousands whose voices are being ignored, as if they don't exist. Nobody wants to dig a little deeper and see if there's even a remote possibility of some truth to their claims.

Why are you even here? You set your opinion in stone at the very beginning, every time- and then refuse to consider any validity to the opinions or thoughts of others. You don't even allow a conversation to take place discussing views you don't agree with.

When it comes to heart problems, there are no long term reactions. Reactions happen within the first week of the second shot or not at all.

The ONLY resources to support that claim is the CDC. Isn't it even slightly conceivable they might be obfuscating the evidence for monetary reasons? Are all or the thousands of perfectly healthy people pre-vax that developed serious heart and other health issues 3/6/12 months later just lying to gain attention? Perhaps they are, or perhaps we should do a little more investigating with an open mind.
Commons sense would lead most people to consider the thousands of people who all have the same or similar serious symptom have had one common element that affected their health: the vaccine. For many, many people the reaction came after an extended time span, so the conclusion- without any supporting evidence- is it couldn't be the vaccine. It's going to take another eight years of collecting data before any professional can draw that conclusion.

originally posted by: nugget1

originally posted by: AaarghZombies

originally posted by: nugget1
There are thousands of people who have had reactions to the vaccine, most within the first week or two, but plenty whose symptoms hit 1-3 months after their shot

The Israeli study showed 0 cases of heart inflammation that began 1-3 months after the second shot. That study included over 2.4 million people. 94 Percent of whom were double vaxxed.

There are a small number of cases where people had blood clots, and then died 1-3 months after the vax, but they were sick well before that.

Most people here have uncovered tons of evidence where numbers have been manipulated to present a completely false picture; data has been falsified or eliminated. There are thousands whose voices are being ignored, as if they don't exist. Nobody wants to dig a little deeper and see if there's even a remote possibility of some truth to their claims.

Why are you even here? You set your opinion in stone at the very beginning, every time- and then refuse to consider any validity to the opinions or thoughts of others. You don't even allow a conversation to take place discussing views you don't agree with.

When it comes to heart problems, there are no long term reactions. Reactions happen within the first week of the second shot or not at all.

The ONLY resources to support that claim is the CDC. Isn't it even slightly conceivable they might be obfuscating the evidence for monetary reasons? Are all or the thousands of perfectly healthy people pre-vax that developed serious heart and other health issues 3/6/12 months later just lying to gain attention? Perhaps they are, or perhaps we should do a little more investigating with an open mind.
Commons sense would lead most people to consider the thousands of people who all have the same or similar serious symptom have had one common element that affected their health: the vaccine. For many, many people the reaction came after an extended time span, so the conclusion- without any supporting evidence- is it couldn't be the vaccine. It's going to take another eight years of collecting data before any professional can draw that conclusion.

No, his views are set in stone and will never change. He will always post the same study because science never changes, is already settled, and doctors and scientists can't be paid off, corrupted, or coerced. Corporate capture can't happen of regulatory agencies like the CDC and FDA even though we have project veritas videos showing these people admitting it has. We have 17,000 doctors and growing who are trying to open peoples eyes about the reality of the situation. He will never change though.

a reply to: AaarghZombies

Is it possible for pericarditis or myocarditis to develop within the first two weeks but the person affected doesn't realize it?

I believe when ignored, both can become worse over time.

So who is to say the reaction didn't happen before the two week period but the person didn't realize it until after.

originally posted by: Itisnowagain
a reply to: AaarghZombies

The highest incidence of myocarditis (10.69 cases per 100,000 persons; 95% CI, 6.93 to 14.46) was reported in male patients between the ages of 16 and 29 years.

So Kyle being 29 was not outside the age bracket then.

Yes, because you don't understand what brackets represent.

He's in the upper bounds, which means that the statistical probability is greatly decreased. It's basic math.

originally posted by: TorqueyThePig
a reply to: AaarghZombies

Is it possible for pericarditis or myocarditis to develop within the first two weeks but the person affected doesn't realize it?

I believe when ignored, both can become worse over time.

So who is to say the reaction didn't happen before the two week period but the person didn't realize it until after.

He was a pro-cyclist. He'd have noticed getting out of bed in the morning. It's no something that he couldn't have noticed.

It's like a pro-shooter not noticing that they've lost sight in one eye.

originally posted by: nugget1

originally posted by: AaarghZombies

originally posted by: nugget1
There are thousands of people who have had reactions to the vaccine, most within the first week or two, but plenty whose symptoms hit 1-3 months after their shot

The Israeli study showed 0 cases of heart inflammation that began 1-3 months after the second shot. That study included over 2.4 million people. 94 Percent of whom were double vaxxed.

There are a small number of cases where people had blood clots, and then died 1-3 months after the vax, but they were sick well before that.

Most people here have uncovered tons of evidence where numbers have been manipulated to present a completely false picture; data has been falsified or eliminated. There are thousands whose voices are being ignored, as if they don't exist. Nobody wants to dig a little deeper and see if there's even a remote possibility of some truth to their claims.

Why are you even here? You set your opinion in stone at the very beginning, every time- and then refuse to consider any validity to the opinions or thoughts of others. You don't even allow a conversation to take place discussing views you don't agree with.

When it comes to heart problems, there are no long term reactions. Reactions happen within the first week of the second shot or not at all.

The ONLY resources to support that claim is the CDC. Isn't it even slightly conceivable they might be obfuscating the evidence for monetary reasons? Are all or the thousands of perfectly healthy people pre-vax that developed serious heart and other health issues 3/6/12 months later just lying to gain attention? Perhaps they are, or perhaps we should do a little more investigating with an open mind.
Commons sense would lead most people to consider the thousands of people who all have the same or similar serious symptom have had one common element that affected their health: the vaccine. For many, many people the reaction came after an extended time span, so the conclusion- without any supporting evidence- is it couldn't be the vaccine. It's going to take another eight years of collecting data before any professional can draw that conclusion.

No, most people haven't.

There was some debate over where to set the boundaries regarding who did because of covid and who merely had covid when they were hit by a truck. This was pretty much resolved by the end of 2020.

Most everything else is lies, hoaxes or cherry picking.

The data is now well known, and we can confirm that it's accurate by comparing the curves for different countries.

The curve for Russia and America are almost identical. The curves for Iran and Israel are almost identical. The curves for the UK and the EU are almost idnetical.

Why would the curves for nations who hate each other be identical unless the situations were identical?

Or are you seriously suggesting that both Iran and Israel are manipulating their data in the exact same way, because ... well ... that would b one of the most insane conspiracies that had ever been suggested on this forum.

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0

originally posted by: nugget1

originally posted by: AaarghZombies

originally posted by: nugget1
There are thousands of people who have had reactions to the vaccine, most within the first week or two, but plenty whose symptoms hit 1-3 months after their shot

The Israeli study showed 0 cases of heart inflammation that began 1-3 months after the second shot. That study included over 2.4 million people. 94 Percent of whom were double vaxxed.

There are a small number of cases where people had blood clots, and then died 1-3 months after the vax, but they were sick well before that.

Most people here have uncovered tons of evidence where numbers have been manipulated to present a completely false picture; data has been falsified or eliminated. There are thousands whose voices are being ignored, as if they don't exist. Nobody wants to dig a little deeper and see if there's even a remote possibility of some truth to their claims.

Why are you even here? You set your opinion in stone at the very beginning, every time- and then refuse to consider any validity to the opinions or thoughts of others. You don't even allow a conversation to take place discussing views you don't agree with.

When it comes to heart problems, there are no long term reactions. Reactions happen within the first week of the second shot or not at all.

The ONLY resources to support that claim is the CDC. Isn't it even slightly conceivable they might be obfuscating the evidence for monetary reasons? Are all or the thousands of perfectly healthy people pre-vax that developed serious heart and other health issues 3/6/12 months later just lying to gain attention? Perhaps they are, or perhaps we should do a little more investigating with an open mind.
Commons sense would lead most people to consider the thousands of people who all have the same or similar serious symptom have had one common element that affected their health: the vaccine. For many, many people the reaction came after an extended time span, so the conclusion- without any supporting evidence- is it couldn't be the vaccine. It's going to take another eight years of collecting data before any professional can draw that conclusion.

No, his views are set in stone and will never change. He will always post the same study because science never changes, is already settled, and doctors and scientists can't be paid off, corrupted, or coerced. Corporate capture can't happen of regulatory agencies like the CDC and FDA even though we have project veritas videos showing these people admitting it has. We have 17,000 doctors and growing who are trying to open peoples eyes about the reality of the situation. He will never change though.

You were wrong about there being graphene in the vax, you were wrong about there being carbon nano particles in the vax, you were wrong about the vax killing those airline pilots, and about masks cutting off oxygen to children, and about the carbon dioxide poisoning, and all of the other crazy doom porn things that you've ever posted.

You're record is more missing than hitting.

I think that in the last year maybe the only hit that you've actually had was when you said that touching little children is wrong.

a reply to: AaarghZombies

He's also 29, which would put him outside the primary grouping.

Primary grouping is 16 - 29 year old males..... according to the link you kindly provided.

I have no idea why anything in the brackets is relevent.

a reply to: AaarghZombies

Acute myocarditis can develop suddenly,

In the early stage of myocarditis, you may have few or no symptoms at all.

Bolded part mine. I know of one person who collapsed with chest pains, thinking he was having a heart attack. Turns out it was acute myocarditis.
John Hopkins

a reply to: AaarghZombies
And you said the South Pole used to be closer to the equator.

Poles do not move closer or further away from the equator.

That's basic common sense.

originally posted by: Itisnowagain
a reply to: AaarghZombies

I have no idea why anything in the brackets is relevent.

It's relevant because the further towards the edge he is the lower the statistical probability is.
At 29 years old and 1 month after vaxxing the statistical odds that this is vax related exist largely as a mathematical construct.

originally posted by: Itisnowagain
a reply to: AaarghZombies
And you said the South Pole used to be closer to the equator.

Poles do not move closer or further away from the equator.

That's basic common sense.

The magnetic pole didn't move, but the land that is currently at the pole did.

Google Continental Drift.