The controlled opposition is everywhere.

Here is an interesting theory, Of how the NWO has infiltrated everything, It has had plenty of time to set up the controlled opposition, Where everything on the MSM and internet is controlled. This is a good point, as we can see that for every scientific paper which has been Peer reviewed, to make a scientific point, has its antipodean counterpart which is just as valid and proves the exact opposite. The effect is to neutralize an argument. What a great idea if you want to push through an agenda. In the end, you end up pushing something that agrees with your bias and end up arguing the points out with someone with an opposite point of view. This is essentially a distraction. Where the bones of what you are arguing about might be nothing to do with what you should be ...., I won't say arguing but discussing in a rational considered way.
The controlled opposition is Good cop. Has an interesting flow of names Dr Campbell, Stew Peters, David Ike, I could go on you know who I mean. They simply exist to deflect how do all these Good Cops get couched as the villains in the piece. Apparently, they are all doing an American tour together, all financed by the Lucis trust formerly Lucifer Publishing, which is the publisher for the U.N and W.H.O strange bedfellows as the real opposition has to contend with thugs in Paramilitary uniforms. The fact that they are gaining influence on the world stage means that the next phase is happening. www.bitchute.com...

If things are as you have stated, then can any source of information be outside the influence of such control?

I suspect that there are such uncontrolled sources, a third option to the polarity of either end. Ultimately one must choose to believe something or nothing at all. Certainly not trusting any source would be good advice given the lukewarm waters.

It is hard to filter and scrutinize everything even if there was no controlled opposition. Perhaps it's time to just give up and say it's all a big lie, a con-game, a load of BS.

a reply to: anonentity

I agree.
The internet has a wall between countries. Things are filtered just as the online comments sections. We don't get crap from independent people in Britain, Canada or Australia, or even from around the country.
Everything done is for the agenda in some way, and they continually try to put the conservatives into a targetable grouping or lead them into a false flag.
The twitter angle is to get people talking freely, so that they can be targeted or grouped in some way as a national security threat.
The SCOTUS junk is to give the stage actors a reason to riot and protest, so the elections can be rigged again, and also to set the stage for the government to decide medical procedures.
The artificial inflation of home prices is to drive people out of their homes and into apartment buildings that can be easily locked down.
The influx of "migrants" will be used to claim housing shortages so that the government has an excuse to confiscate properties, like their doing in Ireland.
The controlled opposition is everywhere. Robert Malone continually tries to rile the Trump crowd into protesting and Stew Peters routinely has deflectionary interviews. Try to post anything on controlled opposition websites and it gets censored. Try it on Patrick Wood's or Naomi Wolf's site, they'll censor you. Naomi censored the following comment within 20 minutes of me posting it:

The vaccines do not have an ingredient list and there is no independent verification of vial contents. As such, it cannot be factually said that people are injected with spike proteins.
The only thing that can be stated with any certainty is that people are injected with the patent.
Therefore, any and all side effects from the vaccines should be viewed through the use of the patent, and not with the assumption that spike proteins exist.
Why aren't celebrity covid doctors talking about this?

Its actually kind of funny watching them repeatedly trying to find a "hero" that the people will latch on to. Luckily, people are catching on to the Trump trap. Finally seeing him for what he is.
Then there's the fake lawyers whose purpose is to make people think that someone is filing legal suits. It gives people the feeling that they don't have to do anything, but the lawyer isn't doing much of anything.
You'll see one of them sitting in front of a colorful circle, 5 colors that relate to the symbology: red, white, blue, gold, green. These are autumn, winter, spring, summer, and the underworld. Order is red/white and chaos is blue/gold. Both sides have a take in the underworld, so both get green. The center is black/white and the 3 are the wise men from the bible. You can see it in action at the vatican.

Note how they use a black person in white to show the center. They aren't promoting the color of the skin.
Easy to see that the lawyer is full of sh%t and displaying symbols. Other examples are the iron and clay crosses from Karen Kingston and Andy Kaufman's "bride" picture on his wall.
Its all going to ramp up for the phony elections, in which the choices will all be one of their own candidates.

a reply to: anonentity

I dont really think there is any sorts of "Illuminati" per-say.

You have the old banking houses and cartels that have been around and are entrenched in the old city of London town(about a square mile).

They have been around since at least the time of the Knight Templar, and probably long before.

They hold sway over just about everything financial around the world and have a dirty finger in every pie to be found.

Including the mass media corporations which facilitates there agenda, but that's just about the accumulation of profit and monies, which equates to control to a certain degree.

"They" dont need an organisation to rule the world from behind the curtain, all thats required is massive bank accounts, lobbyists, and bent political structure plus politicians.

They don't need to gain influence on the world stage because they own the darn thing.

The questions to answer are how many oppose us? What are they willing to do? How far are they ready to risk what they have? And finally What will unite us all?

a reply to: Quarterlyreplies

The answer to everything you asked can be seen around the world, both presently and in the past.

If you are talking how many KNOWINGLY oppose us, I think that number is actually quite small. The problem is that those are the few whom are in control of the resources and militaries of the world. Soldiers and police are everyday people, and generally have good intentions. They usually follow orders pretty well though, considering it is their livelihood.

They are willing to do whatever it takes, including a mass arrest or culling.

Risk? They don’t have much risk. They have underground bunkers, long haul jets to escape into, and other such preparations to weather whatever they see necessary to keep the power structure as is. Why do you think that NUCLEAR war is being so openly talked about? Not only is it a good fear tactic, but for those who make the decisions on wether we go to war or not, there is not a whole lot to loose. They will have theirs no matter what, and they’ve made that very clear.

I think the majority worldwide are already united, but there is no way to openly associate without risk of consequence. That, my friend, is by design.

The idea of controlled opposition isn't new. The most effective type is the public forum where you state your belief, then, on queue, a co-conspirator poses an argument that sounds good but is designed to be easily defeated and makes your original point seem more logical than before. It happens live so most people don't think to question it. Sort of like hillary having a prepared answer for debate questions she was given prior to one of the Presidential debates with Trump.

originally posted by: Wisenox
a reply to: anonentity

I agree.
The internet has a wall between countries. Things are filtered just as the online comments sections. We don't get crap from independent people in Britain, Canada or Australia, or even from around the country.
Everything done is for the agenda in some way, and they continually try to put the conservatives into a targetable grouping or lead them into a false flag.
The twitter angle is to get people talking freely, so that they can be targeted or grouped in some way as a national security threat.
The SCOTUS junk is to give the stage actors a reason to riot and protest, so the elections can be rigged again, and also to set the stage for the government to decide medical procedures.
The artificial inflation of home prices is to drive people out of their homes and into apartment buildings that can be easily locked down.
The influx of "migrants" will be used to claim housing shortages so that the government has an excuse to confiscate properties, like their doing in Ireland.
The controlled opposition is everywhere. Robert Malone continually tries to rile the Trump crowd into protesting and Stew Peters routinely has deflectionary interviews. Try to post anything on controlled opposition websites and it gets censored. Try it on Patrick Wood's or Naomi Wolf's site, they'll censor you. Naomi censored the following comment within 20 minutes of me posting it:

The vaccines do not have an ingredient list and there is no independent verification of vial contents. As such, it cannot be factually said that people are injected with spike proteins.
The only thing that can be stated with any certainty is that people are injected with the patent.
Therefore, any and all side effects from the vaccines should be viewed through the use of the patent, and not with the assumption that spike proteins exist.
Why aren't celebrity covid doctors talking about this?

Its actually kind of funny watching them repeatedly trying to find a "hero" that the people will latch on to. Luckily, people are catching on to the Trump trap. Finally seeing him for what he is.
Then there's the fake lawyers whose purpose is to make people think that someone is filing legal suits. It gives people the feeling that they don't have to do anything, but the lawyer isn't doing much of anything.
You'll see one of them sitting in front of a colorful circle, 5 colors that relate to the symbology: red, white, blue, gold, green. These are autumn, winter, spring, summer, and the underworld. Order is red/white and chaos is blue/gold. Both sides have a take in the underworld, so both get green. The center is black/white and the 3 are the wise men from the bible. You can see it in action at the vatican.

Note how they use a black person in white to show the center. They aren't promoting the color of the skin.
Easy to see that the lawyer is full of sh%t and displaying symbols. Other examples are the iron and clay crosses from Karen Kingston and Andy Kaufman's "bride" picture on his wall.
Its all going to ramp up for the phony elections, in which the choices will all be one of their own candidates.

I suspected as much with the fake lawyers. Dr Fuellmich , the case is going nowhere.

What if we are lead to believe that certain people are controlled opposition,when they're not , just to fully discredit them?
Best is not to trust any politician , left or right, just two sides of the same coin. For the rest I don't know.
For all we know they're hoping we won't vote now making their election stealing easier

a reply to: anonentity
That is what I fear Musk will be using Twitter for. No greater tool for fulfilling the agenda can be found!

a reply to: anonentity

I think the controlled op, they divert or sway your conclusions - for example blaming Pfizer and corporate greed for what happened w Covid .. it hides real big truth - The Conspiracy. Diverts from things like TPTB, and the coordinated global conspiracy..

a reply to: Vroomfondel


I believe during the Bolshevik revolution there were Q-like operations w a high ranking general or something like that who would gather those in the military who opposed the revolution, however the general never ended up doing anything about it. All the real opposition got behind a false leader and drained their energy in a sense by not leading or actually doing anything all the while feeding the illusion that something was being done and that they were going to do something soon.. 2 more weeks!

a reply to: nOraKat

Or then the security organization asks for all the names of the dissidents and they end up in the gulag or worse.

a reply to: MichiganSwampBuck

If things are as you have stated, then can any source of information be outside the influence of such control?

Of course they aren't. I know sources that are 'outside' that.

It is pure fantasy and horror movie premise to think there's any force on the planet that can (at least yet) control -everything- and -all- information. That's why disinformation exists - they obfuscate the truth by contaminating it with lies, so soon no one knows what's true and what's not.

No cabal or oligarchy can control every source of information, though, because it's like trying to fill a siv with water, it's always going to leak out from somewhere. There are SO many methods of acquiring information, knowledge and wisdom, quite many beyond the knowledge of 'most people', that it would be completely impossible to stop the flow of it all - just like it'd be impossible to control every single bit that exists in the internet, it'd be impossible control every source of information.

Until they gain that kind of control, they must resort to all kinds of tactics, where they control the BIG news sources, many of the smaller ones, and basically try to gain control of all the main hubs where information flows, and then add their stuff to all possible information flows so nothing remains completely incontaminated (although they can't own or control every source - you can get information by remote viewing, telepathy, channeling, meditation, spiritual insights and so on - how would anyone control THAT?)..

If they can't convince you, they will confuse you.

In any case, it's literally insanity to believe anyone could control _ALL_ information sources, there are methods, as I mentioned, that most people don't even know about. Of course, there are plenty of old books as well, from the time when their control wasn't as wide-reaching yet, so you can find truth in there as well.

You can even gleam truth from disinformation and sometimes even lies, if you know the core truth and how to find more, if you can perform wise comparisons and such, and sort of shift through the grain to separate chaff from the wheat, and so on.

If you know the core truths, it's harder to lie to you, because you can contrast and compare the details that would require a lie-based core to be believable, etc, to what you know to be true.

I disagree about 'wall between countries' - you can talk real time from America to Canada, from Australia to Taiwan, from Europe to Japan, and so on - no filter inbetween that would interfere with what's being said - after all, it's realtime.

If I type something to a twitch stream, and some streamer reads it out loud and responds to it in voice, where's the wall, where's the filter?

Of course SOME things are filtered, but comment sections (not 'comments sections') are not 'filtered' per se (unless you mean some words are removed or changed to "!#%@%" and stuff - context and meanings are not easy to 'filter' without removing your whole post), they're more likely MODERATED, and this means going through comments and then removing and censoring and so on.

When people are free to talk, post, write, etc., I don't care what you think about 'filtering' or 'walls' - it's still going to be free communication. No one filters my comments (that much should be obvious) unless some ATS moderator decides to tamper with my messages or remove them (haven't noticed this happening much, but then, I don't go back much to check my own stuff)).

Of course any 'discussion website' is always able to remove, moderate, and even filter messages, posts and thus direct and manipulate the discussion, but so far, it hasn't been very likely to happen other than peacekeeping reasons and for removing 'bad words' or 'bad posts' or even banning some posters. What people here seem to be talking about is closer to editing the messages to portray a different viewpoint than the writer meant to.

The bitchute video is quite good. We know controlled opposition is out there and any honest people get suckered in to events or groups that can be proven disinfo to tarnish their reputations. We've seen that over and over. It's the new age Aquarian (Q) stuff we need to watch out for. Our discernment and intuition are critical right now though most don't exercise those mental muscles.

There is an overall objective here and that is to discredit everyone and everything leaving nothing to believe in where authentic voices are drowned out by the dichotomies of opposition shouting at each other.

Well, one common misconception might be that "the elite" is a small minority. It has had time to stockpile elites, if it has been around since "the beginning".

Another misconception might be that "the elite" is one thing, united in purpose. Maybe there is disagreement up top.

But if there are a lot of elites, instead of very few, they surely could promote disinformation campaigns in the form discussed by this thread...