It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Some biblical scholars are calling the Gospel of Judas the most significant archaeological discovery in 60 years. [early 2000s]
The only known surviving copy of the gospel was found in a codex, or ancient book, that dates back to the third or fourth century A.D.
The newly revealed gospel document, written in Coptic script, is believed to be a translation of the original, a Greek text written by an early Christian sect sometime before A.D. 180.
Carbon dating has dated it to the third or fourth century, although written statements by the early church have dated the original gospel of Judas to sometime in the second century A.D. From its creation, the gospel of Judas was known to be a work of the Gnostics.
The Gnostics believed that secret knowledge held the key to salvation, and that sin needed no redemption.
The Gnostics were known for writing several gospels that suited their beliefs. They often glorified biblical characters who committed evil deeds, such as Judas and Cain.
Through convoluted logic, the Gnostics portrayed these men as doing God's work. The gospel of Judas was written long after the death of Jesus, which eliminates Judas as the author. This discrepancy in time means that the Judas gospel was not based on eyewitness accounts, as were all four of the canonical Gospels.
originally posted by: infolurker
a reply to: dontneedaname
Gnostic BS.
Yes, I said it. That is exactly what it is.
Why isn't the Gospel of Judas in the Bible?
The gospel of Judas was written long after the death of Jesus, which eliminates Judas as the author. This discrepancy in time means that the Judas gospel was not based on eyewitness accounts, as were all four of the canonical Gospels.
archive.courierpress.com...
Carbon dating has dated it to the third or fourth century, although written statements by the early church have dated the original gospel of Judas to sometime in the second century A.D. From its creation, the gospel of Judas was known to be a work of the Gnostics.
The Gnostics believed that secret knowledge held the key to salvation, and that sin needed no redemption.
The Gnostics were known for writing several gospels that suited their beliefs. They often glorified biblical characters who committed evil deeds, such as Judas and Cain.
Through convoluted logic, the Gnostics portrayed these men as doing God's work. The gospel of Judas was written long after the death of Jesus, which eliminates Judas as the author. This discrepancy in time means that the Judas gospel was not based on eyewitness accounts, as were all four of the canonical Gospels.
There is much of this sort of thing in the media hype surrounding the publication of the Gospel of Judas. While it may appeal to conspiracy theorists to imagine that the church has suppressed an equally valid alternative history, the fact is that the Gospel of Judas was rejected by the early church because it was just what Irenaeus said it was: an unhistorical, late, and entirely imagined document which was produced by, and served the interests of, a small and highly unusual heretical sect of the second century A.D. In no way should it cause any Christian to reject the Biblical account, because it is evidently inferior in every way to the historical accounts of the canonical Gospels.
originally posted by: infolurker
a reply to: dontneedaname
www.christiancourier.com...
There is much of this sort of thing in the media hype surrounding the publication of the Gospel of Judas. While it may appeal to conspiracy theorists to imagine that the church has suppressed an equally valid alternative history, the fact is that the Gospel of Judas was rejected by the early church because it was just what Irenaeus said it was: an unhistorical, late, and entirely imagined document which was produced by, and served the interests of, a small and highly unusual heretical sect of the second century A.D. In no way should it cause any Christian to reject the Biblical account, because it is evidently inferior in every way to the historical accounts of the canonical Gospels.
originally posted by: Backagain
a reply to: dontneedaname
As pointed out, Judas didn't even write the Book of Judas. Judas is responsible for the crucifixion
of Jesus Christ. Jesus said 'one of you will betray me' at the Last Supper. Judas was the one who betrayed Jesus.
He also committed suicide! He is definitely not "the Chosen One".
Frankly, to even suggest that, is blasphemous!
originally posted by: Themaskedbeast
a reply to: dontneedaname
If you wear a cross or pray to one you are worshipping a false idol.
If you pray to a statue of Jesus or the Virginia Mary you are worshipping a false idol.
If you believe in Jesus that's fine but he is not God.
Jesus didn't need or have a church and neither do you.
You are a temple in and of yourself believe and worship is only found within one's self.
May God have mercy on your souls as most listen but cannot hear.
This whole reincarnation is unfamiliar territory for many – Christian or not. Even those officially “Buddhist” are often ignorant about it –
Buddhists do not believe in an unchanging and everlasting entity called the soul or self. In Buddhism, belief in a permanent and independent entity called the soul or self is regarded merely as a delusion or an illusion created by the mind.
A Buddhist would think Jesus, the Devil, Lucifer, etc...is just bizarre and stupid, etc..or just not think of it at all.
An atheist is smart enough to know that all the major religions as taught are just bunk, but not smart enough to realize there are fragments / aspects of truth.