UK Government Data Shows 92.2 Percent Of All Covid Deaths Are Fully Vaccinated

We've all seen the videos of the head of the CDC, Rochelle Walensky, who gets her medical information from CNN, explain to us that the vaccines wane fairly quickly. The thing is, no one seems to understand what "wane" means. I used to think "wane" meant gradually wear off, but it seems like wane is a euphemism for "fails horribly." Quickly after you "receive protection," you not only lose it, but you also lose the immune system you used to have. It seems like a good trade off though, right? A few weeks of at least the placebo effect of feeling like you have a slightly better chance of not dying from corona than your average unvaxxt cohort, to losing your innate immunity and developing VAIDS.

Pretty much every country is showing trend now.

So the mainstream narrative has changed from trying to manipulate the public into living a life of misery and compliance through fear of a virus with a 0.2% fatality rate, to trying to manipulate the public into living a life of misery and compliance through fear of World War III.

But whilst this Government has you solely focused on the conflict in Ukraine, they have been quietly publishing data that proves the experimental Covid-19 injection campaign has been an absolute disaster.

SOURCE REPORT

SOURCE

a reply to: v1rtu0s0

Wow this doesn’t look good for anyone

Meanwhile here in the USA the push is on to vaccinate young children. They know its useless, likely dangerous to a degree. However no one says stop and lets dissect the data. Just push to vaccinate more people.
If true about disabling the immune system isn't this just creating future sickly humans???

a reply to: v1rtu0s0

So now we believe the government

It is in line with what some of the worlds best experts on immunity said would happen...although now those experts have had their reputation trashed by those people with big heads that lead the health agencies.

Dr. Oz is being canned from his appointment in the government...he mentions that the one they should be getting rid of is fauci instead of him in one of his comments. Although I am not that impressed with Oz that much....he is way better than fauci in the science of health. But then again, I have had cats that were better at it than fauci

I am so glad I wasnt brainwashed enough to get that shot.
Pats myself on the back.

originally posted by: UpThenDown
a reply to: v1rtu0s0

So now we believe the government

Which government? Some have been consistent in releasing data. The US has not.

originally posted by: UpThenDown
a reply to: v1rtu0s0

So now we believe the government

we have a report, from the government, that doesn't look good at all for the government.
If they were going to lie on this one, they are doing it wrong.

originally posted by: americanbuffalo1
If true about disabling the immune system isn't this just creating future sickly humans???

A cynical/logical mind may reach the conclusion that a population of sick people would be a nice way to generate future income for big pharma.

Of course that population would have to be conditioned into taking something which would make them immune compromised first..

Now how could that be acheived I wonder?

a reply to: v1rtu0s0

92.2 Percent Of All Covid Deaths Are Fully Vaccinated

Codswallop.

The pandemic began in The UK in February 2020. The first vaccines where given in The UK in December 2020.

Thousands died before the the first vaccines where administered. The number was 69,771

www.ons.gov.uk...

Total deaths to date is 186,094. And not all those where vaccinated/

coronavirus.data.gov.uk...

How do you get 92.2 % from those figures ? I hate misleading threads.

a reply to: Silcone Synapse

Me too. I wonder how that devious plan could be enacted? Hmmmmm

a reply to: alldaylong

Maybe you should question the UK Health Security Report, instead of the OP.
It appears to be their figures.
If anything the government certainly would not put out figures detrimental to their fake vaccine narrative, so who is bullsh!tting who?

a reply to: alldaylong

SOURCE REPORT


here is the data used. I'm just reading it all, but if you think it's lies, can you post a link as to why please?

a reply to: alldaylong

The chart says February to March

originally posted by: RazorV66
a reply to: alldaylong

Maybe you should question the UK Health Security Report, instead of the OP.
It appears to be their figures.
If anything the government certainly would not put out figures detrimental to their fake vaccine narrative, so who is bullsh!tting who?

The figures i quoted are from Government links.

So i repeat, how do those figures relate to 92.2% deaths for those vaccinated.

To answer the question, they don't. And nowhere even near.

originally posted by: Lemon1234
a reply to: alldaylong

The chart says February to March

Which chart ?

a reply to: alldaylong

The one in the thread and upon reading through his link it's based on a month's worth of deaths from February to March in 2022.

originally posted by: network dude


here is the data used. I'm just reading it all, but if you think it's lies, can you post a link as to why please?

It really shows the vaccines are doing a pretty good job overall.