It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: duncanhidao
IMO - Q should TELL US "what happened" in November 2020, before he starts the teasing and "think for yourself" questions, regarding the upcoming 2022 mid-terms.
originally posted by: interupt42
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: duncanhidao
IMO - Q should TELL US "what happened" in November 2020, before he starts the teasing and "think for yourself" questions, regarding the upcoming 2022 mid-terms.
probably going to get weekly booms until midterms when democrats and rinos resume full control then disappear again.
Gall v. Exxon Corp.
U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York
418 F. Supp. 508 (1976)
Facts
In 1975 Exxon Corporation’s board of directors established a special committee to determine what action to take on allegations that Exxon paid $59 million in corporate funds as bribes or political payments to Italian political parties and others. The special committee investigated the matter, and uncovered millions of dollars of secret payments and political contributions. The special committee unanimously determined that it would be contrary to the interests of Exxon and its shareholders to maintain legal actions against any present or former Exxon director, and authorized Exxon officers to seek dismissal of shareholder derivative actions that had been instituted. In the current action, brought by shareholder Gall (plaintiff), Exxon (defendant) has moved for summary judgment dismissal of the complaint based on the special committee’s determination.
Q !CbboFOtcZs ID: 388aee No.1916327 📁
Jun 26 2018 20:27:15 (EST)
Anonymous ID: 86d85e No.1916245 📁
Jun 26 2018 20:23:23 (EST)
>>1916177
>>1916147
>>1915880
SR & JA in JUNE
Anything?
>>1916245
JA in the news?
Think JC.
Server unlocks SR.
MS_13 (2 187'd nearby) phones unlock command & control.
ETA (estimated).
It has begun.
Q
Q !CbboFOtcZs ID: 267e20 No.1918277 📁
Jun 26 2018 22:10:09 (EST)
Desperate agencies do stupid things.
Dead cat bounce.
You may have the site but we have the source.
mobile.twitter.com...📁
Panic is good.
Panic is right.
July 2018 - the month the world discovered the TRUTH.
Conspiracy no more.
Time to FEED.
Q
Q !!Hs1Jq13jV6 ID: 0b2f6b No.9757400 📁
Jun 26 2020 15:02:11 (EST)
twitter.com...📁
Did order(s) violate government mandated policies?
Would a jury of peers agree their actions were reckless?
Would a jury of peers agree their actions were negligent?
www.law.cornell.edu...📁
"The immunity of a state from suit has long been held not to extend to actions against state officials for damages arising out of willful and negligent disregard of state laws.165 The reach of the rule is evident in Scheuer v. Rhodes,166 in which the Court held that plaintiffs were not barred by the Eleventh Amendment or other immunity doctrines from suing the governor and other officials of a state alleging that they deprived plaintiffs of federal rights under color of state law and seeking damages, when it was clear that plaintiffs were seeking to impose individual and personal liability on the officials. There was no “executive immunity” from suit, the Court held; rather, the immunity of state officials is qualified and varies according to the scope of discretion and responsibilities of the particular office and the circumstances existing at the time the challenged action was taken."
Q
Q !!Hs1Jq13jV6 ID: 1ed764 No.9760093 📁
Jun 26 2020 19:15:35 (EST)
twitter.com...📁
Rising to the occasion.
Understanding what's at stake.
God bless each and every one of you.
We will not fail.
WWG1WGA!!!
Q
Q !!Hs1Jq13jV6 ID: 1ed764 No.9760134 📁
Jun 26 2020 19:18:19 (EST)
twitter.com...📁
The next few weeks will demonstrate our resolve.
WWG1WGA!!!
Q
Q !!Hs1Jq13jV6 ID: 1ed764 No.9760164 📁
Jun 26 2020 19:20:15 (EST)
As the darkness falls so does our enemies.
Q
Q !!Hs1Jq13jV6 ID: 1ed764 No.9760450 📁
Jun 26 2020 19:35:53 (EST)
twitter.com...📁
Stand at the ready.
Q
originally posted by: pianopraze
a reply to: carewemust
Trump won and Democrats cheated.
5 words, easy.
Lol.
Having regard to Article 48 of the Statute of the Court and to Articles 44 and 46, paragraph 1,
of the Rules of Court,
Having regard to the “Special Agreement between the Gabonese Republic and the Republic
of Equatorial Guinea” concluded on 15 November 2016 (hereinafter the “Special Agreement”),
Having regard to the Order dated 7 April 2021, whereby the Court, referring to the provisions
of Article 3, paragraph 1, subparagraphs (a) and (b), of that Special Agreement, and taking account
of the agreement of the Parties concerning the number and order of the pleadings, fixed 5 October
2021 and 5 May 2022 as the respective time-limits for the filing of the initial pleadings in the case,
namely a Memorial of the Republic of Equatorial Guinea and a Counter-Memorial of the Gabonese
Republic;
Whereas the Memorial and the Counter-Memorial were filed within the time-limits thus fixed;
Whereas, under Article 3, paragraph 1, subparagraphs (c) and (d) of the Special Agreement,
the Parties agreed as follows;
“(c) The Party that filed the first pleading will file the third pleading no later than five
months after receiving from the Registrar a certified copy of the second pleading.
(d) The Party that filed the second pleading will file the fourth pleading no later than
five months after receiving from the Registrar a certified copy of the third pleading”;
Whereas in the present case there is no reason to decide otherwise,
Fixes the following time-limits for the filing of the subsequent pleadings in the case:
5 October 2022 for the Reply of the Republic of Equatorial Guinea;
6 March 2023 for the Rejoinder of the Gabonese Republic;
and Reserves the subsequent procedure for further decision.
originally posted by: Guyfriday
Just a thought about this overturning of RoeVWade. If power elites are using aborted fetus tissue to stay alive and well, then how long till their supply runs out?
I ask this since when these people start to die off, will it be blamed on stress induced Suicide, Old age, Covid, or Monkey fu... I mean Monkey Pox? Could this SCOTUS Ruling be the gateway to "Suicide Weekend"?
1. The name “Jane Roe” was created over beer and pizza.
In 1969 Norma was 21 years old, divorced, and pregnant for the third time. (The first two children were placed for adoption.) After seeking an abortion but finding out it was illegal, and then driving to an illegal clinic only to find it closed, adoption attorney Henry McCluskey referred her to two young lawyers in Dallas, Sarah Weddington and Linda Coffee. Weddington (who had traveled to Mexico a couple of years earlier to have an abortion) was seeking a class-action lawsuit against the state of Texas in order to legalize abortion. It was an unlikely party at the corner booth of Columbo’s pizza parlor in Dallas: two recent law-school grads in business suits sitting across the table from a rough and uneducated homeless woman. The lawyers needed a representative for all women seeking abortions—one who was young, poor, and white. They just didn’t want her to cross state lines to get a legal abortion, or the case would be considered moot and dismissed. Without money and five months pregnant, Norma was the ideal candidate. After downing several pitchers of beer, they agreed on using the pseudonym “Jane Roe.” (“Wade” referred to Henry B. Wade, the attorney general of Dallas.)
originally posted by: XtheMadnessNow
a reply to: NoAlienBastards
Thought I was the only one here that periodically listens to Brendon. He goes a little off hinged at times but overall delivers some really good intel, alot I never knew about. He has a surreal background and knows quite alot about Israeli tech supremacy, subversion & shenanigans.
originally posted by: F2d5thCavv2
Guess this thread is now
CLOSED
Go Here for Part 41.
Cheers