Find Me One ATS Member

a reply to: YouSir


You just did.

originally posted by: CptGreenTea
a reply to: ThatDamnDuckAgain

You could say the invasion of iraq and Afghanistan was provoked. But did they deserve to be invaded and occupied for many years?

The civilians lost out there and will lose in Ukraine.

So true and it is always the citizens. It might be when the dust settles we see that both sides had innocents their side was trying to protect. War is hell. Provoking them or being the aggressor is the sin. Both sides are full of sin on this one.

originally posted by: YouSir
a reply to: 19Bones79



Ummm…Raises hand…

Not that I truly want a bloody war…but I want a bloody war…

The truth is…all because of human nature I might add…civilizations…and societies…tend to fester…and rot from within…

Thus is corruption…

It’s a cyclical thing…

Western societies are now at the rot stage…the stage where it becomes incumbent on the ruled…to rise up and break the mold…

All so that the cycle can start again…

History is one long line of…repetition…and there isn’t enough evolution or enlightenment to keep a fart lit against it’s inexorable…weighty…dark…

Which is all we will ever know…which is OK…because all that we create…is made in the lap of entropy…

YouSir

Interesting chose of words, entropy.

en·tro·py
/ˈentrəpē/
Physics
Chemistry
Telecommunications
Mathematics
noun
1.
PHYSICS
a thermodynamic quantity representing the unavailability of a system's thermal energy for conversion into mechanical work, often interpreted as the degree of disorder or randomness in the system.
"the second law of thermodynamics says that entropy always increases with time"
2.
lack of order or predictability; gradual decline into disorder.
"a marketplace where entropy reigns supreme"

Number 2 is what we have here.

a reply to: 19Bones79

How many people want to be "rich people", however they may personally define "rich"?

And what, and to what extent, are these people willing to go to become their personal idea of being "rich"?

We are very much defined by only our limitations; not just those which are imposed upon us, but, more importantly,

Those we impose upon ourselves.

Downloading. Cheers Cole

Weapons don’t win wars. Occupied ground wins wars. It’s the reason America hasn’t won a war since before Vietnam. You can pound a country with all the bunker busters and nukes you like, still won’t win anything.

a reply to: ColeYounger

I admire your spirit. Stand fast. Many are already lost.

originally posted by: 19Bones79
I am issuing a challenge to all ATS members.

If you want a bloody war, raise your hand.

If you want a future where authority has the power to remove you from society through as little as an algorithm identifying you as non-compliant to the State, raise your hand.

If you are enjoying the lies spewed forth to manufacture consent on all opposing sides, don't be shy. Show us your rah-rah and that good old team spirit. No glass house for you.


Through the actions of the elite worldwide, death is coming to many and domination to those remaining.


There is no one left on the planet in a leadership position representing the will of the people.

Threaten their narrative enough to become a blip on their radar and your own personal views will instantly transform you into a terrorist.


While people are being deceived by all the narratives flying around, they do not comprehend that by picking a side they are advancing the interests of the global elite.

The only solution is a global awareness of how the few are working overtime to enslave the many.

If 10% of all people in all countries create a global movement to say we won't pick up arms to fight rich people's wars anymore, we can end this.


Find me one ATS member that would be against this proposal.

Realize that whether you are for or against certain political ideology we have more in common than that which divides us.

I wish to raise my children in an environment free from all the bs that now is broadcast into our minds 24/7.

How about you?


I believe this thread and the comments posted to be an accurate reflection of the larger global demographic.

a reply to: 19Bones79

While people are being deceived by all the narratives flying around, they do not comprehend that by picking a side they are advancing the interests of the global elite.

I disagree , to side with those being attacked by an aggressor has nothing to do with the Global elite but everything to do with being Human , if we see wrong we call it for what it is.

I side with the Russian conscripts being sent to the slaughter as well as the people of Ukraine suffering the devastation of their lives as they are all victims of the same Madness.

Texts from a young Russians phone to his mother , the reality of this pointless war.

FORGIVE YOUR ENEMIES.

It really messes with their heads

a reply to: gortex

But you would have to suspend reality to say someone retaliating for an attack is the aggressor if there was a real reason to retaliate in their mind? The information you have suggests it was Putin who decided with little cause to hurt people. When I see that both sides have been hurting people for eons and there have been some major problems with Russians being murdered by the sitting Ukraine Nazi's is how the Russians see it.

Who should we believe the 1st victims who have been recording incidents since 2014 or the people i can now see were attacking the Russian speaking people from Kyev?

I am at a loss to pick side, but I would choose the 1st victims normally. Am I wrong for believing the Eastern Ukrainian people?



I am not slamming you Gore. I think we have a problem with the data we are seeing not matching other data we have seen.

a reply to: 19Bones79

Nope.

Don't want war.

Ima hippy now.

Peace, love, and bourbon. . . baby.

originally posted by: MichiganSwampBuck
So is the solution passive resistance?

If you don't go along with the program and just go about living your life, you will be harassed and punished in an effort to force you to conform. So peacefully take it, turn the other cheek, then bend over and offer two more cheeks for a good ass whooping?

Thank you sir, may I have another? Is that the idea on how to resist the violence and insanity they are imposing on us?

It is not a good smacked bottom that the masters of social control want to impose. Nothing short of penetration will appease them. A tight sphincter is a sign of rebellion and will be severely dealt with. It will not be a boot stamping on a human face forever. That was just a primitive metaphor to describe a state of helplessness "in the face" of inconceivable violence. And the band will play and the crowd will cheer in the new colosseums.

a reply to: 19Bones79

I wish to raise my children in an environment free from all the bs that now is broadcast into our minds 24/7.

How about you?

It has been being broadcasted into the minds of children for quite some time already. It has been insidious, devious and purposefully perpetrated. It is no accident of attempts at profitable entertainment. The corruption and conditioning of the youngest and most vulnerable minds was intentional. Of course, the question is always - by who exactly?

I think many of the regular posters on this forum are over 50 or even 60. They lived through a childhood that was free of hard core pornography, the graphic violence depicted in so many films and computer games and the casual attitude towards many subjects on television that have deep concerns of a moralistic nature.

We assume that it is a clique of old rich people like Soros or Schwab or Gates whose actions upon our lives we have to fear.

History will see them recorded as farmers. They raised a crop. A crop of humans that they conditioned since the cradle. In the example of Gates, medically conditioned them, and their mothers went running to the dispensaries with their bundles of joy in swaddling clothes, proud good citizens. 21 vaccinations by the time of 4 years old. (not including covid)

Then after the needle penetrations come the penetrations into their minds. They are on their way when they can watch someone being chopped up with a chainsaw without blinking and munching like a calf on popcorn.

The WEF forecast of 2030 will see most of the baby boomer generation permanently retired. The majority of the generations to follow will see no reason to rebel against the "guidelines" of the great reset. It will make complete sense to them. They will not find anything poetic or spiritual in an independent lifestyle, homesteading on an off grid property in the bosom of the rainforest. They will only see the mud, the rain, and the hands that must get dirty. They will not gaze in wonder at the beatitude of mother nature. They would rather gaze through goggles at an artificial virtual world.

These are the people to be feared as the old normal becomes the new. I believe that they will be merciless as they have grown up with a repressed hatred of their parents for one reason or another and will police the values of the new order with a vengeance. That will be heartbreaking to see.

Generation landslide:

Please clean your plate dear
The Lord above can see you
Don't you know people are starving in Korea?
Alcohol and razor blades, and poison and needles
Kindergarten people, they used 'em, they need 'em
The over indulgent machines were their children
There wasn't a way down on Earth here to cool 'em
'Cause they look just like humans, at Kresge's and Woolworth's
But decadent brains were at work to destroy
Brats in battalions were ruling the streets
Sayin' generation landslide closed the gap between them


And I laughed to myself at the men and the ladies
Who never conceived of us billion dollar babies
La, la, da, da, da

Militant mothers hiding in the basement
Using pots and pans as their shields and their helmets
Molotov milk bottles, heaved from pink high chairs
While Mothers' Lib burned birth certificate papers
And dad gets his allowance from his sonny the dealer
Who's pubic to the world but involved in high finance
Sister's out till 5, doing bankers' son's hours
But she owns a Maserati that's a gift from his father
Stop at full speed, at 100 miles per hour
The Colgate invisible shield finally got 'em

But I laughed to myself at the men and the ladies
Who never conceived of us billion dollar babies
La, la, da, da da, yeah-ho

- Alice Cooper Band

originally posted by: HilterDayon

originally posted by: MichiganSwampBuck
So is the solution passive resistance?

If you don't go along with the program and just go about living your life, you will be harassed and punished in an effort to force you to conform. So peacefully take it, turn the other cheek, then bend over and offer two more cheeks for a good ass whooping?

Thank you sir, may I have another? Is that the idea on how to resist the violence and insanity they are imposing on us?

It is not a good smacked bottom that the masters of social control want to impose. Nothing short of penetration will appease them. A tight sphincter is a sign of rebellion and will be severely dealt with. It will not be a boot stamping on a human face forever. That was just a primitive metaphor to describe a state of helplessness "in the face" of inconceivable violence. And the band will play and the crowd will cheer in the new colosseums.

Yeah, no lube or reach around either, they have no sense of romance.

a reply to: DBCowboy


Hippies 4 Trump2024!

a reply to: Justoneman

Where is entropy?

originally posted by: GUGLiL
a reply to: Justoneman

Where is entropy?

You see it in say CNN as they slowly lose relevancy for one example.

a reply to: Dalamax

Can’t fight a war without boots on the ground.

Your train of thought is hard to follow, but this part seems more clear, so I am answering it.

Have you ever heard of airplanes, helicopters, tanks, motorcycles, cars, cannons, ships, warships, battleships, aircraft carriers, submarines, drones, bombs, missiles, (and on and on)...?

I mean, when you consider ALL of those, it should become clear that there are _MANY_ ways to 'fight a war' without boots on the ground. Boots can be anywhere, and people don't even have to be wearing them (although you didn't specify that anyway) to 'fight a war' (whatever this means) without boots being involved in any way, or at least being elsewhere than 'ground' (air, sea, in the water, and so on and so forth - technically, even boots inside a tank or a submarine are not on the ground).

How did you come to this conclusion? I am puzzled that someone in 2022 doesn't know about all these 'bootless war-fighting variants'..

P.S. Forgot to mention Viet Cong... they never wore boots, as far as I know - or at least were able to 'fight a war' just fine without boots in any case.

Name me a war that was fought successfully without seizing and holding ground.

Your post script is perfect. Who occupied the ground at the conclusion of that conflict and who used all the conventional weapons at their disposal to battle with, yet lost?

I would mention Afghanistan but who in their right mind enters a war and then doesn’t fight to win.

Your a spud bud.

a reply to: Shoujikina

remember please the old saying:

"be careful what you wish for, it may not be exactly what you wanted"


While I would love no crime, no war, utopian ideals, etc ad infinitum, I realize that this isn't going to happen in the way I want it to, and that getting there may be bloodier and nastier than I could ever imagine. Just being a downtrodden realist.