Unconsitutional MARCH Against Peaceful Protest on Ambassador Bridge

originally posted by: Allaroundyou
a reply to: LoneCloudHopper2

So I don't live In Canada so I am asking this first part in all seriousness.
The second part is me taking a jab because I can.

So was that peaceful protest which I agree was actually protected when roads have been blocked by force for day?

Now you can have at it with this.
It certainly seems like others right to travel freely and go about daily life was definitely impacted. How can someone call the free and protected while actually restricting other?

On a technical level, I get what your saying. It also violates the law if occupying some area of public transit. But, also, this functionally is the same as the old sit-ins of the 60's and 70's, where people would occupy some area in protest (war, civil rights, etc). Those used to be celebrated.

Let me ask you this, did you feel the same way about the many months-long BLM and Antifa riots?

At the time, many corporations, politicians, and media either donated to them, bailed them out of jail, or told the public "riots are the language of the unheard" and "protests aren't supposed to make you feel comfortable." I'm pretty sure some of the mass demonstrations, occupation of CHAD in Seattle, and burning of some neighborhoods disrupted people's lives.

originally posted by: TerryMcGuire
a reply to: Allaroundyou

Over the decades there have been numerous peaceful protesters by liberals that spilled over into the streets. Some deliberately changed themselves together with their arms bound in metal cylinders to make it hard to pull them apart. They blocked traffic as well. During all of those the conservative community came down staunchly against the protesters using the very same argument you bring up in your post. Police action was expected as well as going to jail. No one was shocked when it happened.

Yes, there were many conservative people saying what now LIBERALS are saying about these protestors. There are hypocrites and selective supporters of civil rights and protest, yes.

But you know what a difference is recently. The media and major corporations cheered on and defended the BLM and Antifa riots in 2020, but are now having an entirely different view on these. Why does the establishment support BLM and Antifa riots?

During the 2020 riots in numerous locations rioters blocked highways and so on, attacking people in cars. And let's be clear, the BLM/Antifa riots WERE more violent so far than the trucker protests.

a reply to: Madviking

Yes I did feel that way about the majority of the BLM protests. I also understand that most like outside players utilized a heated situation to progress a situation. Notatter the side.
So I see exactly that to be the situation. And I do honestly get the idea but in the long run much more constructive conversation should have been had on both sides with dates set for representation on both sides.
Not ultimately stopping commerces because of transportation issues directly caused because of this.
Yes people can walk oraybe ride a bike. But that means nothing when fast food and local markets can't receive vendors.
Not one company is going to pay for that kind of man power.
So that is a compiling issue as those that chose to occupy are most like relying on set up food banks and fast food....
Well sorry to say but if no food is there to sell them no hours to work.

a reply to: Allaroundyou

I get it. But, vaccine mandates are causing many people to lose their jobs, including truckers. People are being excluded from school in many locations, including children. In some countries or cities you can't use almost any public spaces. They are demonizing the unvaccinated, and trying to exclude them from society. They want to vaccinate small children, who have a virtual zero risk of covid (unless they have a serious preexisting condition, which then by all means get the vaccine). In CA they now have vaccine mandates for public school children.

Governor Newsom announces vaccine mandates for school children

Then let's look at the lockdowns, which destroyed global economies and small businesses. For example, in NYC, 1/3 of local restaurants closed and will never reopen. Globally, these covid lockdowns and policies disrupted global economies such that over 100 million NEW people were thrust into extreme poverty.

So, at some point, what will it take for people to wake up? With the above facts, we are in a very serious, dangerous situation. A lot of us believe this is the road to tyranny. People are going to have to get uncomfortable. We need far MORE mass civil disobedience.

originally posted by: Allaroundyou
a reply to: Madviking

Yes I did feel that way about the majority of the BLM protests. I also understand that most like outside players utilized a heated situation to progress a situation. Notatter the side.
So I see exactly that to be the situation. And I do honestly get the idea but in the long run much more constructive conversation should have been had on both sides with dates set for representation on both sides.

Which side is it that refuses to negotiate? They're the ones you can blame.

Not ultimately stopping commerces because of transportation issues directly caused because of this


You can either chose that this is a tiny fringe minority of no consequence or that this is somehow impacting trade and represents a significant number of truckers. You can't have both and the irony is that they're only stopping commerce in a tiny area whereas the government has shut down trade on whole continents.

You're a consummate norp, parroting the most rudimentary analysis offered by the most delusional and out of touch news sources. Global trade and commerce are screwed because most of these truckers were already out of work due to government's willful destruction of normal commerce in spite of mounting evidence that it failed to curb disease spread.

a reply to: LoneCloudHopper2

I just received second hand info out of Milk River that something is going down there.

I can’t verify but it makes sense that they would make a move there as well.

I’ll see what I can learn.

This is NOT the Mud Pit!!!

All rules for POLITE political debate will be enforced.
Members must also Stay on Topic!!!
Trolling, And What To Do About It


Reaffirming Our Desire For Productive Political Debate (REVISED)



You are responsible for your own posts.....those who ignore that responsibility will face mod actions.


and, as always:

Do NOT reply to this post!!

a reply to: LoneCloudHopper2

Double post

a reply to: Madviking

Well if mandatory vaccination is required for a section of government ond plus mom government employees that may restrict some things had already been a problem then why make it worse?
Get the vaccine or not. Jobs have become available for those that choose not. Get with the program or don't. But don't hurts in some fashion or another others.

originally posted by: Allaroundyou
a reply to: Madviking

Well if mandatory vaccination is required for a section of government ond plus mom government employees that may restrict some things had already been a problem then why make it worse?
Get the vaccine or not. Jobs have become available for those that choose not. Get with the program or don't. But don't hurts in some fashion or another others.

With all due respect, that's naive and tone deaf.

It's not "making it worse." These vaccines are experimental, were rushed through approval, and do not stop infection nor transmission of covid. Moreover, Covid has a 99.5% survival rate for all peoples, and 99.9%+ for most people (not high risk). Now the Omicron variant has apparently mutated to a less lethal version. Therefore, these mandates should have never been created and are very destructive.

For many professional jobs, from medical staff to government workers, police, etc, there is not some other magical job to be had, or it is difficult to find one. Many people fired from their position as a doctor or federal worker, or the military, will never be able to work in their field of choice again. Imagine spending 12 years to become a doctor, recover from Covid and have natural immunity, then be fired for not getting vaccinated, be unable to find a similar job, and then have someone on the internet claim there are plenty of alternative jobs (of the same quality and matching your training).

Just saying, "well go dig some trenches then" is incredibly short sighted and doesn't recognize the impact here. With respect, it doesn't sound like you have a professional job you had to spend years studying for and gaining experience in.

Far too many people are turning a blind eye to the abuse of the covid situation by government and major corporations. Many of them did not lose their jobs throughout covid, and are sitting privileged behind their computer. It's time people began pushing back, and frankly I don't care if the compliant finally have to face the reality of what is going on. People's lives have been destroyed by covid policies.

All we want, including the truckers, is the CHOICE freely to get the vax or not, without coercion meaning fear of being fired, excluded from our career of choice, excluded from school, or excluded from participation in society (such as restaurants, gyms, entertainment). This choice is being taken from many people. Nobody is telling you not to get the vaccine.

a reply to: LoneCloudHopper2

A 25 minute video from a former soldier who is somewhat well versed in international and domestic law. Link

We are seeing crimes against humanity by the government and their henchmen. As I have said many times in the past, unfortunately this will not stop until all the government perps/traitors are either arrested or dead. At this point, I don't really care which way it goes, all of them arrested in jail awaiting trial is ok for now. I don't think any rational person wants a civil war and I don't advocate violence because I have been operational in wars, but unless the pieces of sh!t in government, these petty despots, are charged, tried and brought to justice, the cost to freedom loving people everywhere is going to be huge.

Funny rhetorical question... Why isn't the US helping Canadians like they helped Saddam in 1988/89?

Cheers - Dave

a reply to: Madviking

I r chose not to rewrite my response and did flag this for my future response when I am not intoxicated. I believe that wou ld be garnish a much better discord.
So even if this is not on the new topics tomorrow I will send a pM to you as a reminder for at least a PM continuation.

originally posted by: Allaroundyou
It certainly seems like others right to travel freely and go about daily life was definitely impacted. How can someone call the free and protected while actually restricting other?

Were government COVID shutdowns examples of free and protected behaviors in allegedly free and liberty loving nations?

originally posted by: LoneCloudHopper2
a reply to: nugget1

He answers to Klaus Schwab. He only plays the role of Prime Minister of Canada.

Thanks- I guessed wrong.

I just red they're arresting truckers at Milk River.

Crawling back under the bridge to watch the show.

originally posted by: burdman30ott6

originally posted by: Allaroundyou
It certainly seems like others right to travel freely and go about daily life was definitely impacted. How can someone call the free and protected while actually restricting other?

Were government COVID shutdowns examples of free and protected behaviors in allegedly free and liberty loving nations?

You already know the answer to that so I will say well played.
Freedom is free. Not chose because one believes different... You see one issue yet others see others. Science is never 100.
To assume otherwise shows full confidence that inhibits ability.

a reply to: bobs_uruncle

I do think the tide would be turning soon hopefully otherwise no one would be voting for a liberal opposition in Ontario. Whose pushing for the passport systems to be updated with the boosters.

Not everyone is for that if you haven't checked out the liberal leader twitter. These mandates and passports are being disliked by a majority.


"Ignore the fake polls"

originally posted by: vNex92
a reply to: bobs_uruncle

I do think the tide would be turning soon hopefully otherwise no one would be voting for a liberal opposition in Ontario. Whose pushing for the passport systems to be updated with the boosters.

Not everyone is for that if you haven't checked out the liberal leader twitter. These mandates and passports are being disliked by a majority.


"Ignore the fake polls"

I ignore all poles, they are always written based on an agenda, one side or the other. I used to ask my clients how they felt about trudeau, liberal, independent and conservative clients, so I would do my own research. Here's what I got on trudeau off the street (well stores and street) over a 3 year period...

2018 8% support, 68% would like it in jail, 24% would like it hanged
2019 8% support, 68% would like it in jail, 24% would like it hanged
2020 7% support, 68% would like it in jail, 25% would like it hanged
2021 6% support, 61% would like it in jail, 33% would like it hanged

It does have a holdout core of people who appear to be either suckling on the liberal tit or are simply too stupid to understand the impact of the @sshole's tyrannical edicts and pontifications, because they sure aren't policies. It would also appear that the trend is towards saving taxpayer money and fiscal responsibility when dealing with criminals and traitors involved in high crimes, high treason and crimes against humanity. I tend to concur, I think the death penalty is viable in these kinds of cases and an excellent future deterrent for any political clown that decides to operate sideways and criminally.

As an aside, we don't really have any politicians worth voting for these days. I think they should all be marched off to an island, maybe a prison island, maybe the Isle of Snakes off the coast of Brazil. They'd all fit in nicely there as either compatriots or dinner ;-)

Cheers - Dave

a reply to: bobs_uruncle

Thanks for the link, bobs. Justin Trudeau has stated that he might accept Michigan's aid. If they brought American forces onto Canadian soil to repress a peaceful, constitutionally protected protest this would be HIGH TREASON. I am hoping appropriate authorities act and arrest this tyrant before it gets bloody.



Look at that gloating smirk as he threatens his own people!

'High Treason' as legally defined in Canada:

(1) Every one commits high treason who, in Canada,

(a) kills or attempts to kill Her Majesty, or does her any bodily harm tending to death or destruction, maims or wounds her, or imprisons or restrains her;

(b) levies war against Canada or does any act preparatory thereto; or

(c) assists an enemy at war with Canada, or any armed forces against whom Canadian Forces are engaged in hostilities, whether or not a state of war exists between Canada and the country whose forces they are.

Canadian gov site source: www.laws-lois.justice.gc.ca...

Started a new thread on the High Treason issue: www.abovetopsecret.com...