Proof of Ivermectin's Success in Defeating Covid-19 in Uttar Pradesh, India

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
Dr Malone?

This idiot?



www.theguardian.com...


Seems to be a universal truth on ATS that any thread containing the word "Proof" turns out to be anything but. This one included.

Lulz, it is remarkable how easy it is for some people to lap up blatant disinformation.

Dr. Malone is an idiot??

Yes and Fauci is a mega genius, now go on and get your next booster.

a reply to: elementalgrove
No surprise that it's a Guardian reader,says a lot about it.

originally posted by: glen200376
a reply to: elementalgrove
No surprise that it's a Guardian reader,says a lot about it.

Why bother with critical thinking?

Multinational authoritative news sources are way better at telling us what to think.

Much easier!

a reply to: Oldcarpy2

Oh, it doesn't fit your lost narrative? 250 Doctors? Pfft. Shame on your relentless push for falsified statements on data and paid for propaganda, time and time again. Your, "get vaccinated to protect others," is over by the way. There is no logic in that statement. It's stupid at best and makes you look like an idiot. No healthy individual should have been made to take this experimental garbage. But hey, stupid does stupid. You get a vaccine to protect yourself!! Period. The dumb is strong with this one, master!!

Lightmeup04

Because masks don't work...it has been proven and proven again. Please share this so called peer reviewed study that masks work on the aerosol COVID.
TIA.

Lightmeup04

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2

originally posted by: myselfaswell
a reply to: Oldcarpy2

"Dr Malone used the JRE platform to promote numerous baseless claims, including several falsehoods about Covid-19 vaccines and an unfounded theory that societal leaders have ‘hypnotized’ the public. Many of these statements have already been discredited,” the letter said.

So ......... just one example. We know that masks, used, fitted etc etc in a sterile environment can be of use. What's not the same as that is wearing a nappy under your chin. It does demonstrate either A: Stupidity or B: Hypnotised.

If you wear your mask under your chin you are being a bit of an ass.

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
Dr Malone?

This idiot?



www.theguardian.com...


Seems to be a universal truth on ATS that any thread containing the word "Proof" turns out to be anything but. This one included.

so this one name negates the entire article stating that covid was totally eradicated from this area of India with a population 2/3 the size of the US? You sir, win the DERP award. It's not given lightly, so be proud. You have to be a special kind of DERP to win this.

a reply to: v1rtu0s0

And yet the big pharma companies that actually make Ivermectin say not to use it for 99 percent of cases.

They could be making an absolute fortune from it yet the talk their own product down and don't even try to sell it through the gray market.

originally posted by: AaarghZombies
a reply to: v1rtu0s0

And yet the big pharma companies that actually make Ivermectin say not to use it for 99 percent of cases.

They could be making an absolute fortune from it yet the talk their own product down and don't even try to sell it through the gray market.

what is the profit margin on ivermectin vs. the shot?

a reply to: v1rtu0s0

How does wearing a mask take away your rights?

It's not like "they" superglue it to your puss ffs.

As to sending these ""unvaccinated to camps"", where are those now aside from on Bitchute and in your own nut?

eu.usatoday.com...

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: AaarghZombies
a reply to: v1rtu0s0

And yet the big pharma companies that actually make Ivermectin say not to use it for 99 percent of cases.

They could be making an absolute fortune from it yet the talk their own product down and don't even try to sell it through the gray market.

what is the profit margin on ivermectin vs. the shot?

Since they're made by different companies it's the choice between any profit and zero profit.

Besides the vax is price capped in many countries so profit is lower than for ivermectin.

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: AaarghZombies
a reply to: v1rtu0s0

And yet the big pharma companies that actually make Ivermectin say not to use it for 99 percent of cases.

They could be making an absolute fortune from it yet the talk their own product down and don't even try to sell it through the gray market.

what is the profit margin on ivermectin vs. the shot?

Don't take his word for it, just look at Pfizer's profit margins. It's going to be the #1 selling drug in the history of mankind.