a reply to: Kaiju666
But here is the thing. it isn't just that they don't want to accept they are wrong. It is more than that.
Democrats have learned decades ago to get "all the skeletons in politician's closets," and they learned that having evidence of "politician's
skeletons in their closets" could be saved for a time they would need to "reign in someone" that wouldn't kowtow to them. But Obama far exceeded
abuses of power of everyone before him to levels not seen before. After all, not only did Obama use the loyalists he put in every U.S. government
agency to spy on his political opponents, such as Trump, Congress, etc. But he actually weaponized every government agency to spy on all
Americans, including democrats and pro-Obama Americans.
IMO at least some Supreme Court Justices, such as Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett showed that they were not really in favor of the truth in certain
cases. Even though President Trump was told that these two would side with the truth.
In the case of Kavanaugh it is quite easy to see this man doesn't have the temperament to face false accusations. He literally broke down crying when
he was falsely accused of sexual assault by the liar Christine Blasey Ford. Even when it was quite clear that Ford made up her accusations to the
point that she and her friends attempted to blackmail and bully another former friend of Ford, Leland Keyser, into changing her statement to agree
with the made up claims by Ford.
Anyway, it is quite obvious that all the democrat leaders had to do to reign in Kavanaugh was to just tell him that they would continue bullying him
and would continue making false claims about him that that was enough for him to kowtow to the goals democrat leaders wanted regarding the voter fraud
cases of 2020.
As for Supreme Court justice Justice Amy Coney Barrett? She is a much stronger person than Kavanaugh is. For her democrat leaders probably had to
use threats against her family for her to kowtow to the goal democrat leaders had in not allowing any of the cases of voter fraud being even heard by
the Supreme Court. For all his evilness, Obama is a very intelligent man. He also had in his pockets in one way or another every judge in the lower
courts that also agreed not to listen to any of the evidence of voter fraud.
But anyway I digress, there is and was uncontroversial evidence that there was massive voter fraud in the 2020 elections. You don't keep voter
observers 30 feet to 150 feet away from watching what the voter staff were doing with the ballots for them not to see what was being done unless
democrats were hiding what they did.
You don't pull the curtains, or put up cardboard to hide was was happening inside the buildings where voter staff were handling ballots unless they
had something to hide.
Literally even before the election occurred democrats and rinos broke laws making changes to voter rules and laws which is only allowed to be done by
the legislature of each state, but the legislatures of several states were bypassed by rinos/democrat leaders and judges whom were in on the massive
voter fraud that occurred in 2020.
Of course democrat leaders know that if they have to do what they did in 2020 again for the 2024 elections there would be even more Americans
realizing the fact that democrats are illegally changing the will of the people. Which is why democrat leaders now want to federalize elections, just
like Obama tried to do using the same lies that "Russians attempted to hack into our elections", when it was Obama's own DHS which hacked into the
elections of several, if not all, states.
edit on 8-1-2022 by ElectricUniverse because: add and correct comment.