CDC Finally Admits SARS/CoV-2 is A Chimeric Virus Deliberatedly Made By Humans?

On November 17th 2021 the CDC made the following announcement about SARS/CoV-2.

Today, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)’s Division of Select Agents and Toxins published an Interim Final Rule adding SARS-CoV/SARS-CoV-2 chimeric viruses resulting from any deliberate manipulation of SARS-CoV-2 to incorporate nucleic acids coding for SARS-CoV virulence factors to the list of HHS select agents and toxins. In addition, the work to create this chimeric virus is a ‘restricted experiment’ and requires prior approval from CDC before performing the experiment.

The regulation, available at www.federalregister.gov... icon, was published in the Federal Register and CDC will be accepting public comments on the addition of the agent for the next 60 days.

HHS/CDC believes that immediate regulatory oversight of these experiments and the resulting chimeric viruses is essential to protect the public from the potential consequences of a release of these viruses.
...

Import Permit Program (IPP) SARS/CoV-2

Here is the definition of Chimeric:

chi·mer·ic (kī-mĕr′ĭk, -mîr′-)
adj.
1. Relating to or being an organism, part, or molecule that is a chimera: chimeric mice; chimeric proteins.
2. Relating to a monoclonal antibody produced from the cells of a nonhuman organism, usually a mouse, in which a portion of the antibody has been replaced with a human sequence of amino acids. This is done in the laboratory by replacing part of the DNA sequence in the nonhuman cells with a sequence of human DNA.

chimeric

Remember that when president Trump stated we had evidence this virus was created in a Wuhan lab in China the mainstream media and even democrat leaders, the WHO, etc all claimed this statement by President Trump was based on "racism" and not on fact.

Well, on November 17th 2021 the CDC added the SARS/CoV-2 viruses as a chimeric deliberate manipulation, and any further manipulation of the virus has now to get the go ahead of the CDC.

Since almost the start of this plandemic we started getting information that proved the bio-weapons program to make SARS/Coronaviruses more lethal and infectious to humans was outsourced on purpose under the Obama administration and with the help of Fauci.

There is no other way the outsourcing of this virus to a communist dictatorship that has murdered millions of their own people on purpose had any other intention by Fauci and the Obama/Biden administration than to murder as many people as possible through such viruses. The claim by the Obama administration and Fauci that outsourcing these bio-weapons program to the U.S. and world's number 1 enemy, China, was to avoid any accidental release of the virus was an obvious lie because China has a history of more accidental release of viruses from labs than the U.S. has had.

Since the virus escaped apparently before they were able to weaponize it more then the goal was moved to make the vaccines as the delivery method to continue such bio-weapons program. Anyone who dared/dares release info on this bio-weapons program by China, the Obama administration and the Fauci's of the world has found themselves to be shunned from "the scientific community", has been denied funding, etc, and now the CDC is once again making it impossible for independent scientists to investigate this virus without the consent from the CDC itself which has been lying and continues to lie day in and day out about this plandemic.

Now no scientist/scientific group can investigate how to fight this virus or attempt to make any vaccines/mutate the virus unless they have permission from the CDC. Why?

Been saying this for some time. The world is full of trickery.

a reply to: ElectricUniverse

This is not saying that SARS-CoV-2 is a chimeric human made virus.

It is a ruling that SARS-CoV-2 is not to be used in future human made viruses. It is a ban on future experimentation that may use the virus as a basis.

a reply to: chr0naut

Oh, we could only wish.

What this is, they are putting this verbage in there
to strengthen the vaccine mandate.

Read the OSHA guidelines for reasons the mandate is
legal. Pretty much exact.

As usual, the government is lying on all sides.

Shame on them!

a reply to: ElectricUniverse

I'm fairly sure that the CDC has no control of other countries research. They might be able to pull purse strings for like funding for gain of function, but as far as telling the UK, France, Israel, China, they can't do it would more than likely get a loud f you just as if they told the U.S. we couldn't.

a reply to: ElectricUniverse

This plandemic is just the first act, an experiment, in global population control.

Act 2, or the next plandemic will be a REAL killer. Expect it!

originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: ElectricUniverse

This is not saying that SARS-CoV-2 is a chimeric human made virus.

It is a ruling that SARS-CoV-2 is not to be used in future human made viruses. It is a ban on future experimentation that may use the virus as a basis.

Are you sure about that? First, there is plenty evidence that SARS-CoV has been manipulated in labs several years ago. For example.

Chimeric severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV) S glycoprotein and influenza matrix 1 efficiently form virus-like particles (VLPs) that protect mice against challenge with SARS-CoV

Second, the virus escaped from a Wuhan lab and even the Chinese doctors who warned the world about this chimeric virus were disappeared.

Chinese Doctor Disappears after Blowing the Whistle on Coronavirus Threat

The genetic structure of SARS-CoV-2 does not rule out a laboratory origin: SARS-COV-2 chimeric structure and furin cleavage site might be the result of genetic manipulation

Although the CDC does not state this directly it is implying that SARS/Cov-2 is a chimeric virus.

Third, this ban is not just for further experimentation to make new coronaviruses, but it is also a ban on making vaccines and treatments.

In specific the message states: "...adding SARS-CoV/SARS-CoV-2 chimeric viruses resulting from any deliberate manipulation of SARS-CoV-2 to incorporate nucleic acids coding for SARS-CoV virulence factors to the list of HHS select agents and toxins..."

The process to add/incorporate nucleic acids coding is necessary for vaccines as well as treatments.

...
Abstract

Nucleic acid therapeutics offer a new paradigm to rapidly respond to global health problems. The versatility of nucleic acids, especially in RNA therapies, provides the ability to tune levels of specific protein expression, achieving downregulation through short interfering RNA (siRNA) or upregulation by messenger RNA (mRNA) administration. Recent advances in the development of delivery vehicles, including nonviral nanoparticles are crucial to overcome the innate barriers to nucleic acid delivery. Toward this end, current clinical approaches have utilized mRNA and lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) to address the COVID-19 pandemic through novel vaccine strategies, producing efficacious vaccines within one year of sequencing the SARS-CoV-2 genome. Here, we review fundamental concepts required to achieve successful nucleic acid delivery, including the design of LNP systems optimized for mRNA vaccine applications.

Nucleic acid delivery and nanoparticle design for COVID vaccines

Development of nucleic acid vaccines: use of self-amplifying RNA in lipid nanoparticles

Nucleic Acid Vaccine Technologies: DNA and mRNA

The promise of nucleic acid vaccines

...
To combat the SARS‐CoV‐2 pandemic, and many other diseases, nucleic acid vaccines appear to be a promising method.
...

Next‐Generation Vaccines: Nanoparticle‐Mediated DNA and mRNA Delivery

...
Accordingly, nucleic acid-based treatments including aptamers and siRNAs are candidates that might be effective in COVID-19 treatment.
...

Nucleic Acid-Based Treatments Against COVID-19: Potential Efficacy of Aptamers and siRNAs

So in fact this rule does ban not just experimentation into forming new types of coronaviruses, but also making new vaccines against SARS/CoV-2, and also bans any treatments against SARS/CoV-2 from being used except by getting permission from the CDC.

Heck, by extension no scientist/group of scientists could even do any sort of experimentation into the current vaccines without the explicit consent from the CDC. This limits who can not just do experiments for new coronaviruses, but it limits scientists into creating or experimenting with any treatments and vaccines for COVID-19.

If you want to stop an illness (COVID-19), a pandemic as a matter of fact, from a virus such as SARS/CoV-2 you wouldn't put these limits on scientists. It is inefficient and inane.

staff edit

Possession, Use, and Transfer of Select Agents and Toxins-Addition of SARS-CoV/SARS-CoV-2 Chimeric Viruses Resulting From Any Deliberate Manipulation of SARS-CoV-2 To Incorporate Nucleic Acids Coding for SARS-CoV Virulence Factors to the HHS List of Select Agents and Toxins

That is not the admission you are looking for. Or any admission at all, for that matter. Nice try tho.

How can I be a conspiracy theorist? I've known this for over a year now.

21st Century Pandemic Timeline

It seems like most CTs I've studied are now being accepted as facts.

a reply to: ElectricUniverse

if you bothered to read further you'd notice it never said anything about covid being a chimeric virus, its meraly a report about regulations for creating chimeric viruses using covid because the possibility to be used as a weapon.

Read til plandemic. Then woosh went the credibility.

a reply to: ElectricUniverse

originally posted by: Antisocialist
a reply to: ElectricUniverse

This plandemic is just the first act, an experiment, in global population control.

Act 2, or the next plandemic will be a REAL killer. Expect it!

Bull#, go back to playing with blocks.

This is the same kind of logic that is keeping this virus alive. There are so many uneducated people out there that have no idea what has been done to save so many people and they love reading # like this to further the disinformation that will probably kill them. along with others that are trying to help but are hindered by severely weakened immune systems. Go the # away.

a reply to: ElectricUniverse

As to the last sentence of your fine OP, US law prohibits the manufacture of vaccines against any disease for which there are successful existing therapies such as HCQ and Ivermectin and plain old Vitamin D.

21USC360

That is why these mRNA devices were released under Emergency Use Authorization.

It's been public knowledge for years prior to 2020, if you know where to look. But most of society is apathetic in these matters and focused on survival more than justice.

Therefore, to examine the emergence potential (that is, the potential to infect humans) of circulating bat CoVs, we built a chimeric virus encoding a novel, zoonotic CoV spike protein—from the RsSHC014-CoV sequence that was isolated from Chinese horseshoe bats1—in the context of the SARS-CoV mouse-adapted backbone. The hybrid virus allowed us to evaluate the ability of the novel spike protein to cause disease independently of other necessary adaptive mutations in its natural backbone. 

The November 2015 article (reacting to the study quoted above) reads:

An experiment that created a hybrid version of a bat coronavirus — one related to the virus that causes SARS (severe acute respiratory syndrome) — has triggered renewed debate over whether engineering lab variants of viruses with possible pandemic potential is worth the risks.

In an article published in Nature Medicine1 on 9 November, scientists investigated a virus called SHC014, which is found in horseshoe bats in China. The researchers created a chimaeric virus, made up of a surface protein of SHC014 and the backbone of a SARS virus that had been adapted to grow in mice and to mimic human disease. The chimaera infected human airway cells — proving that the surface protein of SHC014 has the necessary structure to bind to a key receptor on the cells and to infect them. It also caused disease in mice, but did not kill them.

But other virologists question whether the information gleaned from the experiment justifies the potential risk. Although the extent of any risk is difficult to assess, Simon Wain-Hobson, a virologist at the Pasteur Institute in Paris, points out that the researchers have created a novel virus that “grows remarkably well” in human cells. “If the virus escaped, nobody could predict the trajectory,” he says.

www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov...

www.nature.com...

www.nature.com...

www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov...

originally posted by: ElectricUniverse

originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: ElectricUniverse

This is not saying that SARS-CoV-2 is a chimeric human made virus.

It is a ruling that SARS-CoV-2 is not to be used in future human made viruses. It is a ban on future experimentation that may use the virus as a basis.

Are you sure about that? First, there is plenty evidence that SARS-CoV has been manipulated in labs several years ago. For example.

Chimeric severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV) S glycoprotein and influenza matrix 1 efficiently form virus-like particles (VLPs) that protect mice against challenge with SARS-CoV

Second, the virus escaped from a Wuhan lab and even the Chinese doctors who warned the world about this chimeric virus were disappeared.

Chinese Doctor Disappears after Blowing the Whistle on Coronavirus Threat

The genetic structure of SARS-CoV-2 does not rule out a laboratory origin: SARS-COV-2 chimeric structure and furin cleavage site might be the result of genetic manipulation

Although the CDC does not state this directly it is implying that SARS/Cov-2 is a chimeric virus.

Third, this ban is not just for further experimentation to make new coronaviruses, but it is also a ban on making vaccines and treatments.

In specific the message states: "...adding SARS-CoV/SARS-CoV-2 chimeric viruses resulting from any deliberate manipulation of SARS-CoV-2 to incorporate nucleic acids coding for SARS-CoV virulence factors to the list of HHS select agents and toxins..."

The process to add/incorporate nucleic acids coding is necessary for vaccines as well as treatments.

...
Abstract

Nucleic acid therapeutics offer a new paradigm to rapidly respond to global health problems. The versatility of nucleic acids, especially in RNA therapies, provides the ability to tune levels of specific protein expression, achieving downregulation through short interfering RNA (siRNA) or upregulation by messenger RNA (mRNA) administration. Recent advances in the development of delivery vehicles, including nonviral nanoparticles are crucial to overcome the innate barriers to nucleic acid delivery. Toward this end, current clinical approaches have utilized mRNA and lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) to address the COVID-19 pandemic through novel vaccine strategies, producing efficacious vaccines within one year of sequencing the SARS-CoV-2 genome. Here, we review fundamental concepts required to achieve successful nucleic acid delivery, including the design of LNP systems optimized for mRNA vaccine applications.

Nucleic acid delivery and nanoparticle design for COVID vaccines

Development of nucleic acid vaccines: use of self-amplifying RNA in lipid nanoparticles

Nucleic Acid Vaccine Technologies: DNA and mRNA

The promise of nucleic acid vaccines

...
To combat the SARS‐CoV‐2 pandemic, and many other diseases, nucleic acid vaccines appear to be a promising method.
...

Next‐Generation Vaccines: Nanoparticle‐Mediated DNA and mRNA Delivery

...
Accordingly, nucleic acid-based treatments including aptamers and siRNAs are candidates that might be effective in COVID-19 treatment.
...

Nucleic Acid-Based Treatments Against COVID-19: Potential Efficacy of Aptamers and siRNAs

So in fact this rule does ban not just experimentation into forming new types of coronaviruses, but also making new vaccines against SARS/CoV-2, and also bans any treatments against SARS/CoV-2 from being used except by getting permission from the CDC.

Heck, by extension no scientist/group of scientists could even do any sort of experimentation into the current vaccines without the explicit consent from the CDC. This limits who can not just do experiments for new coronaviruses, but it limits scientists into creating or experimenting with any treatments and vaccines for COVID-19.

If you want to stop an illness (COVID-19), a pandemic as a matter of fact, from a virus such as SARS/CoV-2 you wouldn't put these limits on scientists. It is inefficient and inane.

The majority of geneticists and virologists have said that the creation of SARS-CoV-2 in a lab is unlikely, but no-one can be entirely sure. Despite this, there are people who for sensationalist or political reasons promote the idea.

Consider that a specific genetic change has a likelihood of arising in a population of a million in 100 years. In a lab, doing gain of function research, it is probably that they can tweak conditions to make things say 10 to 100 times as likely to occur. So, for them to effect the genetic change in the lab, would require about a million experimental attempts. A genetic manipulation in a lab would require at minimum 48 hours to perform and to test for. Even if the lab could effect 1,000 manipulation/tests simultaneously, it would take a probable 800 years of lab work to achieve. And that's for only one directed genetic change.

Of course, if the lab were only recording all the genetic information about all the strains of each virus that were measurable in a population of bats, and were measuring their interactions against humanized mice, then no GOF was happening and so the likelihood of the lab creation of the virus by natural accident is even less likely.

There are also many other reasons why the whole lab leak theory is unlikely as well, things to do with how specifically human adapted the SARS-CoV-2 virus actually is. The fact that bats and pangolins can't really catch or incubate the human virus. The fact that even despite similarities to bat viruses, no zoonotic link or reservoir species can actually be established.

originally posted by: BernnieJGato
a reply to: ElectricUniverse

I'm fairly sure that the CDC has no control of other countries research. They might be able to pull purse strings for like funding for gain of function, but as far as telling the UK, France, Israel, China, they can't do it would more than likely get a loud f you just as if they told the U.S. we couldn't.

That would explain why Fauci, Gates, et al have used Africa, India, China, etc. for their playground. US laws mean nothing to the top tier players and fulfilling the agenda.

originally posted by: MichiganSwampBuck
How can I be a conspiracy theorist? I've known this for over a year now.

21st Century Pandemic Timeline

It seems like most CTs I've studied are now being accepted as facts.

Actually, they're being considered 'spoiler alerts'.

originally posted by: charlyv

Bull#, go back to playing with blocks.

This is the same kind of logic that is keeping this virus alive. There are so many uneducated people out there that have no idea what has been done to save so many people and they love reading # like this to further the disinformation that will probably kill them. along with others that are trying to help but are hindered by severely weakened immune systems. Go the # away.

So you actually think that if people were to just bow down to what you think about this virus it will disappear?...

Sorry to rain on your parade but COVID-19 is here to stay because it has an animal reservoir, because it is a zoonotic disease, which means this virus is going to exist for the rest of our lives and very probably for the rest of our gran-children's and great grand-children's lives similar to the flu and other diseases that also have an animal reservoir.

COVID-19 is not going to be stopped any time soon, and the sooner people realize this perhaps the faster we can take away this tool of fear that has grasped so many people from those in world governments who want to control every aspect of people's lives using this fear for COVID-19.

Animal reservoirs of SARS-CoV-2: calculable COVID-19 risk for older adults from animal to human transmission