It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Who Will Get The Most Attention on Jan 6th 2022. Nancy Pelosi or Donald Trump?.

page: 2
17
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 1 2022 @ 10:46 AM
link   

originally posted by: MDDoxs
a reply to: carewemust

Nancy will generate the most attention, since there is so much corporate tech backing of the democratic agenda.

Trump trying to “address” the nation seems a bit too formal, is it not a situation where he will speak and some people with listen? Can a former president really “address” the nation? As a free citizen yes….but not as a leader.

I hope Trump is bringing the long awaited evidence along with him.




The White House is using the "there's nothing to see here" excuse for withholding documents from a Congressional Investigation.


The article you provided says that the Biden administration will still release the majority of documents to the panel with the exception of a few. They cite national security issues on the ones they will withhold.



Addressing the nation in the new sense of what it means. When Biden "addresses the nation", its an insult to our intelligence.



posted on Jan, 1 2022 @ 10:51 AM
link   

originally posted by: halfoldman
The most attention hey?

Doesn't that depend on what they do?
OK - who can win the race for the most outrageous wardrobe malfunction?

Which pestilence might we behold?
It's a saggy terror, that's foretold.


Nancy is putting together a panel of historians to let Americans know how fragile our nation is.

The schedule includes lawmakers' testimonials, a prayer vigil with members of the Senate and a panel discussion with historians Doris Kearns Goodwin and Jon Meacham to "establish and preserve the narrative" of Jan. 6.
www.nbcnews.com...

Riveting television..that's for sure.



posted on Jan, 1 2022 @ 10:53 AM
link   
a reply to: carewemust

Ah yes, because that's standard ritual that Bezos and Zuckerberg and Musk and Dorsey and even Fauci indulge in very regularly. Organizing a rally with their name plastered all over it to encourage donations and remind the world they haven't sold the ranch. Obvious attention seeking is obvious.

edit on 1-1-2022 by TzarChasm because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 1 2022 @ 12:07 PM
link   
a reply to: carewemust

The rigging continues !!!!!

(from OP)
Nancy Pelosi Sets Jan. 6 Commemoration Schedule, Historians to ‘Establish Narrative’ 😁

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) released a schedule for January 6 to mark a year since protesters entered the Capitol building —

including a designated time for select historians to “establish and preserve the narrative” of what happened that day.


"Select" Historians ?? ROFLMAO




posted on Jan, 1 2022 @ 12:31 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

Isn't that her job as the speaker of house? Assemble a coherent sequence of events as completely as possible?



posted on Jan, 1 2022 @ 12:45 PM
link   
Personally (and watching from abroad), I don't think Democrats have many legs to stand on right now.
I think Biden ruined it for them, maybe even for generations.



posted on Jan, 1 2022 @ 01:21 PM
link   
a reply to: halfoldman

The previous administration who spent 2.5 years ignoring (as opposed to accidentally overlooking) the Fukushima-size time bomb ticking away in Wuhan ruined it for a lot of people all over the world. But nobody wants to talk about that because it invokes accountability.



posted on Jan, 1 2022 @ 01:30 PM
link   
Perhaps, accountability can be investigated, but worse that that, the US at the moment has a President who is in steep mental decline.

In fact, who's piloting the ship at the moment is anyone's guess.



posted on Jan, 1 2022 @ 01:39 PM
link   

originally posted by: TzarChasm
a reply to: xuenchen

Isn't that her job as the speaker of house? Assemble a coherent sequence of events as completely as possible?


But she never uses real and verified facts. Only made up sensationalized fables and tall tales 🤣🤣🤣

And where is it codified that this is her job as Speaker ?? 🤣🤣🤣





posted on Jan, 1 2022 @ 01:42 PM
link   

originally posted by: TzarChasm
a reply to: halfoldman

The previous administration who spent 2.5 years ignoring (as opposed to accidentally overlooking) the Fukushima-size time bomb ticking away in Wuhan ruined it for a lot of people all over the world. But nobody wants to talk about that because it invokes accountability.


Where has that story been vetted ? 😲



posted on Jan, 1 2022 @ 01:51 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

So there's this thing called Google, you can use key phrases like "Obama virology moratorium" or "NIH moratorium rescinded" or "trump virology security protocols" or "trump Wuhan lab oversight" and find all the details you need to connect the dots. There's even some fun little footnotes about how Fauci shipped his pet projects overseas to get around the moratorium.

Happy hunting.
edit on 1-1-2022 by TzarChasm because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 1 2022 @ 06:50 PM
link   
We all need to come together



posted on Jan, 1 2022 @ 06:56 PM
link   
a reply to: TzarChasm

You ignorant patronizing snob 🤣🤣🤣🤣



posted on Jan, 1 2022 @ 06:57 PM
link   

originally posted by: MrsNunTeacher
We all need to come together


...and then ?? 🕳️🥥



posted on Jan, 1 2022 @ 07:12 PM
link   

originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: TzarChasm

You ignorant patronizing snob 🤣🤣🤣🤣


Is your Google broken? Or are you resentful because I suggested you do your own fact checking because I don't just do people's homework for free? We can discuss rates if you want to hire my services.


originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: TzarChasm
a reply to: xuenchen

Isn't that her job as the speaker of house? Assemble a coherent sequence of events as completely as possible?


But she never uses real and verified facts. Only made up sensationalized fables and tall tales 🤣🤣🤣

And where is it codified that this is her job as Speaker ?? 🤣🤣🤣





That explains why she's enlisting the services of historians and witnesses to help compile a complete sequence of the Jan 6 incursion so we don't have to depend solely on her expertise in the subject. I expect she's just "speaking for the house" as opposed to inventing a previously nonexistent occupation where she's the head of the office of history because she's bored.

edit on 1-1-2022 by TzarChasm because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 1 2022 @ 07:45 PM
link   
a reply to: TzarChasm

🤣🤣🤣🤣keep it up



posted on Jan, 1 2022 @ 08:43 PM
link   

edit on 1/1/2022 by semperfortis because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 1 2022 @ 11:46 PM
link   

originally posted by: halfoldman
I promise you a pie in every chicken (apologies to Peter Poole and the Lower East Side).

How about lemonade - will there be at least one whole lemon in every glass of lemonade?



they get their choice of mush, blue, grey, red or green.

then after, start their work period back in their cubicles.



posted on Jan, 1 2022 @ 11:53 PM
link   

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: TzarChasm
a reply to: halfoldman

The previous administration who spent 2.5 years ignoring (as opposed to accidentally overlooking) the Fukushima-size time bomb ticking away in Wuhan ruined it for a lot of people all over the world. But nobody wants to talk about that because it invokes accountability.


Where has that story been vetted ? 😲





Vetted by the same obama officials that secretly restored funding to the wuhan lab a few days before Trump took office.

And then LIED about it, directly to congress, until eventually caught in those lies.



posted on Jan, 1 2022 @ 11:56 PM
link   
a reply to: TzarChasm


You do realize what the history of hiring 'official historians' is, right?

Probably an apt comparison though.



new topics

top topics



 
17
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join