Top public health figures accused of genocide...sent to ICC

a reply to: JimmyNeutr0n

We arent even in the ICC though,because it cotradicts our COTUS. thats why bush ignored them.

a reply to: trollz

The ICC is not recognized in the USA.

originally posted by: LordAhriman
LOL

Mengele laughed too at the Nuremburg code, so you are in good company.

a reply to: NoCorruptionAllowed

mengle didnt have the us army protecting him from deportation though is what can be argued.

originally posted by: paraphi
Anti-vaxers of the world, unite!

The criminal complaint is brought forth by former Pfizer vice president Dr. Michael Yeadon and human rights lawyer Hannah Rose. They are joined by Astrophysicist Piers Corbyn, retired law enforcement officer Mark Sexton, nurse Louise Shotbolt, funeral director John O’Loony, and human rights activist Johnny McStay.

Quote from the OPs article... Dr Michael Yeadon, who has brought this case, is a loony. Piers Corbyn (yes, Jeremy Corbyn's brother) is also barking mad. These are a bar of Cadbury's Fruit and Nut!

This will be put in the bin for being the stunt it is.

This attack the person, not the idea is only contributing to growing censorship and tyranny we now live under. Grow up. Michael Yeadon was actually very highly regarded until he challenged the narrative. The same thing is happening to thousands of doctors world wide.

Attacking the person to avoid answering the difficult questions seems to be some #ing new woke movement. Until the woke have their characters attacked and voices silence, then it won’t be so popular with that crowd either.

a reply to: bobs_uruncle

it depends if that country is signed on to have the icc
as an authority over them,...

in some treaties, a country may be a party to an agreement.
but until it is ratified? it dont mean nuffin,

originally posted by: macaronicaesar
This attack the person, not the idea is only contributing to growing censorship and tyranny we now live under. Grow up. Michael Yeadon was actually very highly regarded until he challenged the narrative.

Um. This whole complaint to the ICC is attacking "the person", or rather a range of "perpetrators". The complaint is a consolidated list of fantasy.

Michael Yeadon has a track record for spouting untruths about Covid. Sure, he may think they are truths, but they have been debunked.

I have no problem with him spouting drivel, or making a complaint to the ICC. However, I reserve my right to point out that it won't get far, and it's a stunt.

originally posted by: paraphi

originally posted by: macaronicaesar
This attack the person, not the idea is only contributing to growing censorship and tyranny we now live under. Grow up. Michael Yeadon was actually very highly regarded until he challenged the narrative.

Um. This whole complaint to the ICC is attacking "the person", or rather a range of "perpetrators". The complaint is a consolidated list of fantasy.

Taking the "person" and "perpetrators" out of the equation, please explain/show how the complaint is "a consolidated list of fantasy. "

With the possible exception of the Graphene Hydroxide, virtually everything seems scientifically correct. So, please, show.

originally posted by: Jimy718
... please explain/show how the complaint is "a consolidated list of fantasy. "
With the possible exception of the Graphene Hydroxide, virtually everything seems scientifically correct. So, please, show.

Happy for you to say why you think the the "perpetrators", who are mainly senior UK politicians + Bill Gates are committing genocide against the UK population (and the World). This is one of the fantasies in the complaint. Oh, and crime against humanity, murder et al.

a reply to: paraphi

If the effort fails at ICC, it will be because of the corruption at ICC, not because of the merits of the case.

The evidence for this plandemic is overwhelming for those of us who have taken the time to examine the facts and evidence.

Fauci, Tedros, and the men of Davos and their hundreds of puppet leaders have very much committed crimes against humanity.

originally posted by: cappie
a reply to: bobs_uruncle

it depends if that country is signed on to have the icc
as an authority over them,...

in some treaties, a country may be a party to an agreement.
but until it is ratified? it dont mean nuffin,

You can make the perfect case, present all the evidence in the world, have a solid conviction, but if the court doesn't have "teeth" it means nothing. Let's say Bill Gates is charged under the ICC and convicted of crimes against humanity, genocide, mass murder, etc., which would likely (hopefully) be punishable by death. Who's going to bring him in, who's going to execute him? I am sure a lot of us would be "up" for that job and have no problems executing sentence, but again, would a conviction be enforceable? If you do the deed will you be convicted of murder in another jurisdiction? There are always problems if you don't have all the information and a solid authority to proceed with impunity (and immunity). We'd like the kind of immunity the mRNA jab mftrs have, hell, so many can "vaccinate" people from over 1500-2000 metres ;-)

For any of the criminals, I like the idea of bounties, just put out a good number, proof can be head or hands, or alive if you like ;-) There are sites in the dark web with names and amounts, I just don't know how reliable the payday is? Governments, military and CI however, are reliable, but they are all compromised, they are targeting the good guys. Sorry if a payday sounds mercenary, but there are lots of very bad people in the world that need to see an unhappy ending and sometimes you need controllable monsters to kill a pervasive and insidious evil.

Cheers - Dave