Just found a bridge on the moons surface

originally posted by: 0bserver1
Very interesting find, and I would love to see this from a clearer image, if such image exists?

Nope, can't do that! The lunar orbiter uses a "keyhole" style camera(s) that when orbiting the earth's planetary surface at approximately 95 miles it will take pictures that one can read the writing on a newspaper. However, while orbiting the moon at 30 - 35 miles, the pictures are fuzzy, grainy and out of focus. (Maybe they haven't found a newspaper on the moon's surface, yet.)


No one has explained this "phenomena" fully, yet except that the camera is too close to take a focused picture. Makes one wonder what kind of brains we have running NASA or what they are hiding?

Thanks for all the replies.
I am the OP, and still hoping and awaiting someone with experience in lunar maps do some follow ups.
I tried but having a hard time finding this place on alternative maps.
Please take a look at the pictures again, and be sure to notice the shadow the underneath this object.

One person suggested it could be a meteor impact trail.. but it lacks the ejecta, impact, color, and this is straight.. and I mean really straight line. I think this could be important.

a reply to: butcherguy

As do I, but those were on flat surfaces, and not a straight line over an apparent depression on the surface.

Not saying it is a bridge, but it's not formed by the elements, and it's not, imo, your typical impact marking..

It seems to show elevation and on the bottom end of it, appears shadows matching the other shadows cast. Looking around for similar things, I can't find any, and this stands out as different..

a reply to: M5xaz

Do you have any proof it’s something other than natural or a defect in the data / film.

How many of these claims have failed over the decades?

Straight is all relative. Do you have any actual metric how smooth or bumpy the object is?

Anyway…

The Indian Ocean hides a feature known as the Ninety East Ridge or the Ninety Degree Ridge. This is a rather descriptive name. As it implies, the ridge aligns very closely with the 90th degree of longitude east. The feature stretches approximately 5,000 km (3,100 mi). The Public Broadcasting Service calls it “the longest, natural, straight-line feature on the planet (both on land or in the sea).”

www.howderfamily.com...

Yeap. No going to box in and discredit Mother Nature. Not going to dismiss a trick of light, bad data, a processing error.

Is there really a face on Mars?

science.howstuffworks.com...

a reply to: Spacespider

Why would aliens need a bridge when they don't even drive cars..
a Ghost craft would just fly over the ravine , wouldn't it.

originally posted by: Gothmog

originally posted by: butcherguy
I will go with the possibility that it is a gouge left by a meteor strike.

We have a winner .

Wrong! It would not be that straight and over six miles and over a gorge to boot. Give us a break!

originally posted by: rigel4
a reply to: Spacespider

Why would aliens need a bridge when they don't even drive cars..
a Ghost craft would just fly over the ravine , wouldn't it.

Hey Duh! Bridges are not just for cars.

a reply to: rigel4
Deliberate artifacting by NASA seems plausible.
But why this particular location?
This isn't Last Chance Canyon.

a reply to: GuitaristRob

Also there are no roads leading up to the "bridge"...

No Cars , No Roads .. No need for 6 mile bridge.
Aliens fly man

Off Topic ...
I killed Bassus tonight
fu8k that asshat

originally posted by: rigel4
a reply to: GuitaristRob

Also there are no roads leading up to the "bridge"...

No Cars , No Roads .. No need for 6 mile bridge.
Aliens fly man

You ever hear of a foot bridge?

Zoomed in further you can see support structures below it and they have repeating pattern of engineering shapes.

As far as seeing anything near to it, would need better resolution. If this was colored and doctored up a bit without really changing anything of foundation, then people would think it was a sat photo of some bridge on Earth quite fast.

As soon as something like this is on the moon, then a thousand explanations come forth.

Whatever it is it doesn't cast a shadow, which any kind of elevated structure would do in this lighting.
Lens artefact or something to that effect would be my call.

originally posted by: GuitaristRob

originally posted by: rigel4
a reply to: GuitaristRob

Also there are no roads leading up to the "bridge"...

No Cars , No Roads .. No need for 6 mile bridge.
Aliens fly man

You ever hear of a foot bridge?

Course i have, but no one walks these days especially aliens on the moon.

a reply to: seabhac-rua

If this were a skinny Bob video I would agree.
If this wasn't intentional than its more likely in the class of a compression artifact.

originally posted by: GuitaristRob

originally posted by: Gothmog

originally posted by: butcherguy
I will go with the possibility that it is a gouge left by a meteor strike.

We have a winner .

Wrong! It would not be that straight and over six miles and over a gorge to boot. Give us a break!

Wrong .
Look at this
Here

Buh-bye now .
You have crow to eat .

originally posted by: Gothmog

originally posted by: GuitaristRob

originally posted by: Gothmog

originally posted by: butcherguy
I will go with the possibility that it is a gouge left by a meteor strike.

We have a winner .

Wrong! It would not be that straight and over six miles and over a gorge to boot. Give us a break!

Wrong .
Look at this
Here

Buh-bye now .
You have crow to eat .

Oh the Mars scar, lol it's no where near as straight as this, and whatever hit or rubbed Mars made a gorge. Sorry physics don't work that way. If it was a meteor as you said it would have skipped over the gorge and there would be no straight line. My god man I been here long enough to know that you are full of it. Eat crow, maybe you should start your liquid supper then go back to bed and dream of crows that have been around longer than we have.

Any bridge needs a road or path leading up to it and a road or path to continue on once off the bridge.
None of this is even remotely discernable.

The only thing it has going for it is that it is a straight line. Most likely a geologic fault.

originally posted by: charlyv
Any bridge needs a road or path leading up to it and a road or path to continue on once off the bridge.
None of this is even remotely discernable.

The only thing it has going for it is that it is a straight line. Most likely a geologic fault.

Something this size could be ancient and built well, like our ancient pyramids. All roads that led to it could have been eroded and washed away eons ago by winds and water or storms.

originally posted by: GuitaristRob

originally posted by: charlyv
Any bridge needs a road or path leading up to it and a road or path to continue on once off the bridge.
None of this is even remotely discernable.

The only thing it has going for it is that it is a straight line. Most likely a geologic fault.

Something this size could be ancient and built well, like our ancient pyramids. All roads that led to it could have been eroded and washed away eons ago by winds and water or storms.

So? Washed away on the moon? With no signs of a road bed? And no other structures surviving from a society of master bridge builders that built their seven mile bridge to nowhere?

Reads like a Monty Python or Douglas Adams skit about a society that only had the attribute to build bridges. Or maybe the galactic bridge builders got their moons confused. Oh, Poon. Sorry, we built the bridge on moon…. We bad.