Mein Cough

god bless you DB and this earth, Please in the name of Jesus let the insanity end.


Do you think this is true

www.lifesitenews.com...


Bayer executive: mRNA shots are ‘gene therapy’ marketed as ‘vaccines’ to gain public trust
‘We probably would have had a 95% refusal rate’ for these shots two years ago, but the pandemic and marketing of the injections as ‘vaccines’ has made them popular with the public, said Stefan Oelrich.

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: FauxMulder

originally posted by: TheRedneck
a reply to: FauxMulder

I call the 60%.

Thanks! I dont know what I would do with 20% more men's underwear magazines.

I only have them for the articles.

I dated a girl that liked to read magazines. She had issues.

Ill see myself out

I am sharing this post

They probably would have had a 95%+ refusal rate of the Zyklon B gas that was used on concentration camp detainees two years before the Fuhrer took office. Fortunately for them, Bayer and I.G. Farben, they got a chancellor whose patience wore a little thin, and they got a 100% compliance rate. It probably would not have gone over well with the Auschwitz detainees if it had been marketed as a poison gas. What genius those marketing people are at Bayer and Hoechst AG, the successor to I.G. Farben that invented the abortion pill. From mass murderers to marketing experts at Hoechst and Bayer; what a transformation of conscience they have gone through these past decades, from a few tens of million dead to hundreds of millions of dead children. What Germany did for the world, all in pursuit of that virtue they call sustainability, watchword of the socialist elites. Hitler's little reset now the great global reset of the neo nazis.

I have said a dozen times Hitler won.

Now I must add with Americas help.

a reply to: chr0naut

Which do you think is more likely? No natural immunity which goes against human biological principles, or inaccurate/faulty tests?

originally posted by: FauxMulder
If he doesn't respond within the next 40 seconds I think we should assume the worst. AM as well. Then we shall proceed to split their stuff up. 60 / 40

They say the average person with the Omi contaminates 5 people, I went to Asswhole Foods, Pet Smart, the pizza place, Total Wine, Kohls (don't ask), Barnes and Noble and CVS.

I believe I personally infected billions.

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: FauxMulder
If he doesn't respond within the next 40 seconds I think we should assume the worst. AM as well. Then we shall proceed to split their stuff up. 60 / 40

They say the average person with the Omi contaminates 5 people, I went to Asswhole Foods, Pet Smart, the pizza place, Total Wine, Kohls (don't ask), Barnes and Noble and CVS.

I believe I personally infected billions.

You could have at least hit a Walmart or three. Rookie.

a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

In college I once dated a super spreader.

I'll show myself out

a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

Please tell me you licked your hands before touching all the things. jk

a reply to: ketsuko

I think he just licked the things. Probably how he got it in the first place.

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

In college I once dated a super spreader.

Ah, yes...the Forcep twins...

Good Times...good times.

originally posted by: FauxMulder
You could have at least hit a Walmart or three. Rookie.

I don't wear sweats outside the house and ride a mobility scooter so they won't let me in any of them.

originally posted by: ketsuko
Please tell me you licked your hands before touching all the things. jk

I touched all the produce. All of it.

originally posted by: TheRedneck
a reply to: chr0naut

But doctors aren't scientists or researchers.

A doctors knowledge is supposed to based upon the outcome of peer review and existing best practice compliant with the advice of bodies such as the FDA, CDC and AMA. At least one would hope?

I hope not! I prefer a doctor who understands the various mechanisms involved in treatment (aka a "scientist") and is capable of making decisions based on my overall medical situation, not what some bureaucrat at the CDC thought yesterday.

And that is what I have. Good luck with the robotic "doctors."

But vaccination does provably reduce transmission, if you take into consideration the time factor.

But transmission is not reduced at other times. Do you believe that one must be exposed to the virus for days before contracting it?

You have thanked me a couple of times when I have confirmed that you got some little bit right. You seem to like taking credit for stuff you almost get right.

Actually, I was thanking you for your honesty. It's so rare I thought a statement of appreciation was appropriate.

But it is a bit disingenuous to grant that I am some type of authority when we agree, but also that I am grossly ignorant when we disagree.

One true statement does not make everything one says afterwards true as well.

Of course those that die are not infectious.

Actually, they are; they are just not breathing.

The other side of the coin is that far fewer vaccinated people die or even develop a severe case, compared to those that have, unvaccinated.

That is not my experience. My experience is that there is no noticeable difference.

In New Zealand, no one who is fully vaccinated has even ever been to the wards where severeCOVID-19 cases are treated, let alone died. And we have had hundreds of patients admitted to those wards in the last few months. None of them vaccinated. It seems also that daily new cases are dropping again, now that more than 90% of the New Zealand population are vaccinated.

Congratulations.

But are you sure about those numbers? I ran a quick search and it shows that New Zealand is at 75% fully vaccinated, not 90%. It also shows deaths from the Chinese virus in mid-late November, after the population was over 70% vaccinated. Now, whether these deaths were vaccinated or not, I cannot say, but I can say that your exaggeration of the vaccination numbers causes me to doubt your other statements.

TheRedneck

Literally, from the link you posted:

originally posted by: BrujaRebooted
a reply to: chr0naut

Which do you think is more likely? No natural immunity which goes against human biological principles, or inaccurate/faulty tests?

The fact that immunity fades over time, and that people may be re-infected with COVID-19, does not mean "no natural immunity".

It is the idea that natural immunity is '100% effective forever', that is a pure fantasy and misunderstanding.

Also, all tests may have small error rates, but that does not mean that they are useless or inaccurate. In fact, a test confirmed by symptoms, as in the case in this thread, is extremely likely to be true.

a reply to: chr0naut

Perhaps lifetime natural immunity is too much to hope for, but having positive PCR tests 4 times in not even 2 years is a bit too little natural immunity protection, so Im staying with my faulty test determination.

So I posted last night in here about my Covid journey thus far. My symptoms kicked in Sunday. Now it's Thursday night and I feel pretty good. Most of the symptoms are gone. Still a little tired but I feel at about 80% back to normal. Hopefully this is the end of it and a second wave doesn't hit me. I don't want to jinx myself.

a reply to: DBCowboy

I just checked in on this thread to see how you were doing. I don't feel well enough to read 15 pages, but I see you are still posting, so I hope that means you are over it.

a reply to: tamusan

Yep.

Think I'll live.



Thanks

a reply to: chr0naut

Common sense.

Please.

It's why people still get colds even though they've had colds.

Viruses attenuate.

a reply to: Enzo954

If I'm to offer any advise it'd be not to rush it. I did and still do and I relapse. I just can't keep my fat ass seated or in bed when I know I should be.