I Now Know Why "Covid" Happened

originally posted by: and14263
Ok, GREAT theory.

But in my country restrictions have been and gone and we live as normal. So maybe you are just paranoid?

Actually it's true though. If you understand some very basic and documented facts that Pfizer and other connected big pharma companies, those big well known names in Bilderberg circles of power players and their lackeys are tied to old Nazi Germany, IG Farben and the SS scientists (allowed to roam free Via Project Paperclip) are pulling the EXACT same play on the populace and nation's government officials, except this time it isn't just Germany, it's most everywhere, and people are being played and falling for it, and allowing their rights to be stripped away.

It is very obvious to those who have eyes to see.

They were already in control, they couldn't have had it better. so why would they want to give up a good thing they had going. Why the world spinning rapidly getting burnt out then suddenly crashing into a brick wall. There was a timeline for something. Strangely coinciding with many of astronomical events..

originally posted by: conspiracytheoristIAM

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: The GUT
a reply to: chr0naut

Or we could just say "you'se" when addressing a mouthpiece/cheerleader directly.

Plusgood.

Maybe you make fun of this cause you're in lock step with the oppressors. ? Would a one world govt. some how be beneficial to you ?

Not in the slightest, as far as I can see.

I live in New Zealand, which is fairly nice, but it doesn't have the resources to support everyone who might possibly want them. A one world government would probably try and re-allocate resources to the maximum number of people. Ruining my good thing here.

By the same token, do you actually see a single one world government as being possible? I see too many people in a good situation, like myself, who don't want that spread like a tiny bit of butter on too much bread (LOTR quote). But looking at the disagreements and fighting between nations (often over stupid tiny things), and the break up of attempts to unify (USSR and EU), I don't see a one world government as anything other than doom-porn.

a reply to: chr0naut
That sounds more like complacency to me. Whereas I agree a one world government would fall from it’s own weight, the process would destroy a great deal of social structure on the way down.

I think it’s foolish to think that megalomania and it’s associated sociopathy and psychopathy has somehow just “gone away” solely because we are in the 21st century.

How many maniacs with the same MO murdered countless millions in the 20th century alone?

I'm aware some countries are relatively normal, as are some locations in the US. But, in other countries, and other locations in the US, they are instituting Orwellian policies. Also, the media and a lot of politicians across the globe continue to push heavy fear and increased control.

Is there a single major power that is not? I'd be happy to hear the answer is yes.

originally posted by: and14263
Ok, GREAT theory.

But in my country restrictions have been and gone and we live as normal. So maybe you are just paranoid?

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: conspiracytheoristIAM

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: The GUT
a reply to: chr0naut

Or we could just say "you'se" when addressing a mouthpiece/cheerleader directly.

Plusgood.

Maybe you make fun of this cause you're in lock step with the oppressors. ? Would a one world govt. some how be beneficial to you ?

Not in the slightest, as far as I can see.

I live in New Zealand, which is fairly nice, but it doesn't have the resources to support everyone who might possibly want them. A one world government would probably try and re-allocate resources to the maximum number of people. Ruining my good thing here.

By the same token, do you actually see a single one world government as being possible? I see too many people in a good situation, like myself, who don't want that spread like a tiny bit of butter on too much bread (LOTR quote). But looking at the disagreements and fighting between nations (often over stupid tiny things), and the break up of attempts to unify (USSR and EU), I don't see a one world government as anything other than doom-porn.

Here's the thing, I agree that a forced one world government would collapse under it's own weight sooner or later. However, that doesn't mean people might not try.

Many megolomaniacs have tried to create far reaching empires, from Alexander the Great to Ghengis Khan and the USSR leading the Communist International, which sought world-wide communism. Did they all fall apart or fail? Yes. But, they wreaked absolute havoc and killed millions of people, all three. The Mongol Empire, and USSR, both operated for a few generations of hell for some people. Think of Rome. British Empire. They both lasted a good bit.

Now, we have better technology and travel capabilities. It's not inconceivable that a larger Rome could be established that was 2/3 of the world rather than what it was. Think of the British Empire plus far better tech and surveillance.

I still think that a global tyranny would eventually fail as such systems don't match human needs and economy. That's why communism failed. But that still doesn't address how badly it may suck for a few years before the fall.

originally posted by: Madviking

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: conspiracytheoristIAM

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: The GUT
a reply to: chr0naut

Or we could just say "you'se" when addressing a mouthpiece/cheerleader directly.

Plusgood.

Maybe you make fun of this cause you're in lock step with the oppressors. ? Would a one world govt. some how be beneficial to you ?

Not in the slightest, as far as I can see.

I live in New Zealand, which is fairly nice, but it doesn't have the resources to support everyone who might possibly want them. A one world government would probably try and re-allocate resources to the maximum number of people. Ruining my good thing here.

By the same token, do you actually see a single one world government as being possible? I see too many people in a good situation, like myself, who don't want that spread like a tiny bit of butter on too much bread (LOTR quote). But looking at the disagreements and fighting between nations (often over stupid tiny things), and the break up of attempts to unify (USSR and EU), I don't see a one world government as anything other than doom-porn.

Here's the thing, I agree that a forced one world government would collapse under it's own weight sooner or later. However, that doesn't mean people might not try.

Many megolomaniacs have tried to create far reaching empires, from Alexander the Great to Ghengis Khan and the USSR leading the Communist International, which sought world-wide communism. Did they all fall apart or fail? Yes. But, they wreaked absolute havoc and killed millions of people, all three. The Mongol Empire, and USSR, both operated for a few generations of hell for some people. Think of Rome. British Empire. They both lasted a good bit.

Now, we have better technology and travel capabilities. It's not inconceivable that a larger Rome could be established that was 2/3 of the world rather than what it was. Think of the British Empire plus far better tech and surveillance.

I still think that a global tyranny would eventually fail as such systems don't match human needs and economy. That's why communism failed. But that still doesn't address how badly it may suck for a few years before the fall.

A new Rome?

Wouldn't that be more like an almost democratic expansionist militaristic Republic, with a senatorial government, that then degenerated into an Empire under a tyrant?

Hmmm?

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: Madviking

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: conspiracytheoristIAM

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: The GUT
a reply to: chr0naut

Or we could just say "you'se" when addressing a mouthpiece/cheerleader directly.

Plusgood.

Maybe you make fun of this cause you're in lock step with the oppressors. ? Would a one world govt. some how be beneficial to you ?

Not in the slightest, as far as I can see.

I live in New Zealand, which is fairly nice, but it doesn't have the resources to support everyone who might possibly want them. A one world government would probably try and re-allocate resources to the maximum number of people. Ruining my good thing here.

By the same token, do you actually see a single one world government as being possible? I see too many people in a good situation, like myself, who don't want that spread like a tiny bit of butter on too much bread (LOTR quote). But looking at the disagreements and fighting between nations (often over stupid tiny things), and the break up of attempts to unify (USSR and EU), I don't see a one world government as anything other than doom-porn.

Here's the thing, I agree that a forced one world government would collapse under it's own weight sooner or later. However, that doesn't mean people might not try.

Many megolomaniacs have tried to create far reaching empires, from Alexander the Great to Ghengis Khan and the USSR leading the Communist International, which sought world-wide communism. Did they all fall apart or fail? Yes. But, they wreaked absolute havoc and killed millions of people, all three. The Mongol Empire, and USSR, both operated for a few generations of hell for some people. Think of Rome. British Empire. They both lasted a good bit.

Now, we have better technology and travel capabilities. It's not inconceivable that a larger Rome could be established that was 2/3 of the world rather than what it was. Think of the British Empire plus far better tech and surveillance.

I still think that a global tyranny would eventually fail as such systems don't match human needs and economy. That's why communism failed. But that still doesn't address how badly it may suck for a few years before the fall.

A new Rome?

Wouldn't that be more like an almost democratic expansionist militaristic Republic, with a senatorial government, that then degenerated into an Empire under a tyrant?

Hmmm?

The US has often been said to be a degraded republic being now used by an elite oligarchy to operate a form of neo-imperialism. What's to say it couldn't mutate, by accident or by design, into a fuller autocracy in alliance with other interests?

originally posted by: Madviking

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: Madviking

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: conspiracytheoristIAM

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: The GUT
a reply to: chr0naut

Or we could just say "you'se" when addressing a mouthpiece/cheerleader directly.

Plusgood.

Maybe you make fun of this cause you're in lock step with the oppressors. ? Would a one world govt. some how be beneficial to you ?

Not in the slightest, as far as I can see.

I live in New Zealand, which is fairly nice, but it doesn't have the resources to support everyone who might possibly want them. A one world government would probably try and re-allocate resources to the maximum number of people. Ruining my good thing here.

By the same token, do you actually see a single one world government as being possible? I see too many people in a good situation, like myself, who don't want that spread like a tiny bit of butter on too much bread (LOTR quote). But looking at the disagreements and fighting between nations (often over stupid tiny things), and the break up of attempts to unify (USSR and EU), I don't see a one world government as anything other than doom-porn.

Here's the thing, I agree that a forced one world government would collapse under it's own weight sooner or later. However, that doesn't mean people might not try.

Many megolomaniacs have tried to create far reaching empires, from Alexander the Great to Ghengis Khan and the USSR leading the Communist International, which sought world-wide communism. Did they all fall apart or fail? Yes. But, they wreaked absolute havoc and killed millions of people, all three. The Mongol Empire, and USSR, both operated for a few generations of hell for some people. Think of Rome. British Empire. They both lasted a good bit.

Now, we have better technology and travel capabilities. It's not inconceivable that a larger Rome could be established that was 2/3 of the world rather than what it was. Think of the British Empire plus far better tech and surveillance.

I still think that a global tyranny would eventually fail as such systems don't match human needs and economy. That's why communism failed. But that still doesn't address how badly it may suck for a few years before the fall.

A new Rome?

Wouldn't that be more like an almost democratic expansionist militaristic Republic, with a senatorial government, that then degenerated into an Empire under a tyrant?

Hmmm?

The US has often been said to be a degraded republic being now used by a elite oligarchy to operate a form of neo-imperialism. What's to say it couldn't mutate, by accident or by design, into a fuller autocracy in alliance with other interests?

It's swallowing itself. Soon all that will be left is a huge distended stomach - like haggis.

When NGO's start changing the definition of words like Pandemic, Vaccine and Immunity you might want to look closer at what they're really up to.

originally posted by: The GUT
a reply to: chr0naut

Or we could just say "you'se" when addressing a mouthpiece/cheerleader directly.

mook works too.

I live in a city in North Queensland, Australia, where everything is perfectly normal. No masks, no virus, and most noticeably no B/S.
I presume 'theym' will get around to dealing with us, or not. I suspect not.

For a second I thought I'd have to apologise, but I see we are still oblivious...

a reply to: Type1338

Who are ‘they’?
Who are the ruling elite?
How would a disease that does not discriminate based on wealth or power lead to world control if those in control are just as susceptible as the rest of us?

COVID as a means of some new world order tool is illogical, because it, like other coronavirus variants, is indiscriminate; it doesn’t care who you are.

A subtle shift in the world domination game?

Nation states with charismatic despotic leaders no longer lead the fray.

Now, it's charismatic and despotic leaders of the transnational financial institutions who think they know better than anyone else and want total control just so they can prove something to themselves.

originally posted by: noonebutme
a reply to: Type1338

Who are ‘they’?
Who are the ruling elite?
How would a disease that does not discriminate based on wealth or power lead to world control if those in control are just as susceptible as the rest of us?

COVID as a means of some new world order tool is illogical, because it, like other coronavirus variants, is indiscriminate; it doesn’t care who you are.

You're right of course. Think about it. 'They', presumably the elite few who own 98 percent of the wealth, could surely come up with a better plan than some risk laden virus to control us all. Pretty ridiculous from every angle. We have all become ridiculously ridiculous if you ask me.

originally posted by: noonebutme
a reply to: Type1338

Who are ‘they’?
Who are the ruling elite?
How would a disease that does not discriminate based on wealth or power lead to world control if those in control are just as susceptible as the rest of us?

COVID as a means of some new world order tool is illogical, because it, like other coronavirus variants, is indiscriminate; it doesn’t care who you are.

I would say that that’s a fairly limited point of view. Logic dictates discrimination and reason, understanding that this is a genetically modified virus, it’s very simple with CRISPR technology to modify specific criteria for expression, just like our own natural occurring genes are triggered by environmental conditions : epigenetics.

A cursory perusal of 19th/20th century history and eugenics…it’s players, their progeny organizations etc..and a little intellectual honesty could easily land you within the realm of foul play.

Your response and the one person in agreement are more suspect than the working hypothesis this situation is part of a larger global conspiracy.

originally posted by: noonebutme
a reply to: Type1338

Who are ‘they’?
Who are the ruling elite?
How would a disease that does not discriminate based on wealth or power lead to world control if those in control are just as susceptible as the rest of us?

COVID as a means of some new world order tool is illogical, because it, like other coronavirus variants, is indiscriminate; it doesn’t care who you are.

It's the fear campaign that never ends that is the tool. Covid is just the name of the flu strain they chose to attach the fear campaign to.

Force compliance on the planet and see where the largest areas of resistance are and then build a stricter compliance mandate to see how far they can push that particular resistant population.

If you think covid is a killer virus well you just haven't been paying attention. If you've been on ATS since 2008 and ask these questions I have to wonder if you realize what this place represents. And it ain't conspiracy theory mate.

originally posted by: Type1338
Force compliance on the planet and see where the largest areas of resistance are and then build a stricter compliance mandate to see how far they can push that particular resistant population.

But who is forcing this? How would they cooperate to maintain it? You can’t even get a democratic country’s own political parties to come to together for the good of the people - why do you people think a single, over-arching global ‘they’ would be able to achieve the same??

If you think covid is a killer virus well you just haven't been paying attention.

It’s a killer virus for the several million it’s already killed; due to either existing health issue, underlying genetic conditions and so on. It isn’t more deadly than the flu - it’s more transmissible, which is why it’s considered so dangerous. Because the more people who get it, increases the chances of it mutating into a variant that is far worse. Hence why masks, social distancing and vaccinations are key to reducing the spread and the number of people contracting it, thereby allowing it to mutate.

Are you people so stupid that because you don’t understand basic virology, you create ridiculous conspiracies to explain your lack of understanding? I suppose that’s how religion started so…. Fair play to you.

If you've been on ATS since 2008 and ask these questions I have to wonder if you realize what this place represents. And it ain't conspiracy theory mate.

Yes. It’s a place for some bored, ill-educated people to spout nonsense and misinformation about things they don’t understand. Sometimes, there’s threads about cool things but normally it’s all bullsh*t. Like the flat earth, Mandela Effect and even this thread.

I came here because I was hoping to see some genuine, actual reveals about UFOs and aliens. Never happened.