No Assisted Suicide In Germany Unless Vaccinated For Covid

Total ass backwards micromanagement systemic dumbf#kedness

Stop the world ,I wanna get off.

a reply to: Signals

I have not complied will not comply in any shape or form for anything covid.

The refusal of service reads ridiculous, but the reasoning is not insane within the belief that the "measures" taken have worked.

The therapy could be arranged online, but the injection I believe (should) have to take place in a medical setting. There have been many "measures" taken for in person contact. Many have talked about refusal of even medical services to the unvaccinated. That's crazy to me, but in the world in which we have existed the last couple of years this decision isn't farfetched enough to warrant the reaction some are having.

I am half expecting a follow-up article in the near future along the lines of...

A euthanised, unvaccinated, previously COVID-free corpse has tested positive for COVID-19 post-euthanisation. The effects of this are profound so as we take every precaution to protect our vital workers in these trying times, no corpse shall be cremated or buried without first being double vaccinated.

originally posted by: AccessDenied
Stop the world ,I wanna get off.

I'm sorry.

You'll have to join the queue.

Please have your papers ready to save time.

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: Signals

So before you die. . . you have to get a shot so you won't get sick?


Check please.

No, what the article is saying is that if you want to die, you can't endanger the people who are helping you die (who would have to work very closely with you) by giving them Covid.

And besides, if you have already decided you want to die, why should you care about side effects from any vaccination?

originally posted by: 1947boomer

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: Signals

One would asume that all medical staff i volved are already vaccinated, so It still makes no sense.

So before you die. . . you have to get a shot so you won't get sick?


Check please.

No, what the article is saying is that if you want to die, you can't endanger the people who are helping you die (who would have to work very closely with you) by giving them Covid.

And besides, if you have already decided you want to die, why should you care about side effects from any vaccination?

One would assume that all medical staff i volved are already vaccinated, so It still makes no sense.

An article that reminded me of this thread.

Man forced to take vaccine in order to get lung transplant, dies from vaccine complications, before the lung transplant could occur.

www.thegatewaypundit.com...

No wonder the vaccine manufacturers were given protection against being sued.

a reply to: Signals

“assisted suicide and the preliminary examination of a patient’s ability to make decisions freely implies physical closeness between people. However, that is precisely the precondition for the spread of Covid.”

I think what they're saying is, "If you want to die because you're afraid of COVID, or because you feel alone and alienated because of COVID lockdowns and closures, take the vaccine first, and see if being able to be around people again changes your inclination."

a reply to: Sookiechacha

I think if someone is really suicidal they'd probably just want to kill themselves.

a reply to: Signals

No surprise to me.

I've always known the cv19 jabs are an attack on the soul not to save the body.

They don't care if you euthanise the body, its the soul their after......so makes perfect sense.

originally posted by: CthruU
a reply to: Signals

No surprise to me.

I've always known the cv19 jabs are an attack on the soul not to save the body.

They don't care if you euthanise the body, its the soul their after......so makes perfect sense.

Exactly…

a reply to: Signals


Simultaneously the laws in lot of countries on the world were changed to allow eugenesics when the pandemic started.

In some others abortion laws were approved too, simultaneously.

It is now your country,

It is a global directive.

There hoping the jab kills them first cause well it’s cheaper for them that way.

originally posted by: 1947boomer

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: Signals

So before you die. . . you have to get a shot so you won't get sick?


Check please.

No, what the article is saying is that if you want to die, you can't endanger the people who are helping you die (who would have to work very closely with you) by giving them Covid.

And besides, if you have already decided you want to die, why should you care about side effects from any vaccination?

So the vaccines won't save us?

originally posted by: Signals

originally posted by: CthruU
a reply to: Signals

No surprise to me.

I've always known the cv19 jabs are an attack on the soul not to save the body.

They don't care if you euthanise the body, its the soul their after......so makes perfect sense.

Exactly…

It's like these non-humans saying: "You still don't get it do you? We are not your uncle! What do we have to do, what do we have to say to get you to understand that?"

Do a dive, never get out of this world alive.

originally posted by: AccessDenied
Stop the world ,I wanna get off.

Stay and participate in the GREAT AWAKENING. What "they" want is for the unvaccinated to jump off a bridge or building. Don't give them that satisfaction!

Yoo vill not be allowed to die, unless you are proteeeeckted from dying first.

Hogaannnnn *waves fist*

a reply to: CthruU

I was thinking Pharma wants a financial contribution from us all but more than that they want our soul.

Can't even die respectfully in your own bed with a shot huh ?

This bring nothing good , neither will it stop people.

I am pro assisting suicide , because if they really want to die you cannot stop them only thing we can do is make it less traumatising for 3rd parties.

Such as train conductors , firemen tasked with cleaning up the remains , relatives who cannot give a proper funeral and end up with a box full of remains...

It is frowned upon i know being pro assisted suicide , but who are we to decide how some one lives or dies ?