I authored this post for the sake of discussion from the standpoint that many aren't looking at, namely that some of these political upheavals and
clashes of personality might be indicative of a species divergence or something that might be attempting to occur or might occur sometime in the
future. The reason for this conclusion is four factors. First, it is always more clarifying to try to look at things from an intrinsic perspective,
as this does away with the endless arguing over "us humans and our 'personalities'" which can go on forever and leads more to a harder understanding
of the subject. Humans tend to think of things in terms of personality and we can argue all of our likes and preferences until antares explodes.
Two, because if it is a subject that can be discussed, there is no reason it should not be. The parameters for a discussion are that nothing proposed
is meant as a petty insult, is a hardline written in stone conclusion, or is an opener for petty bickering but if it can be discussed or if there is a
reason for it, well then why not? The third factor is that there is enough evidence to have lead to this conclusion within the context of the
circumstance, enough to make it a subject that should be discussed. The fourth factor is that if this is or even could be occurring, then a certain
amount of understanding/preparation is in the works for a certain outcome. This can be done amicably the more people realize that this could be the
outcome and drop all of our petty hurts and just look at this as a curiosity or possibility, the more we can move on, choose not to hate for our
differences, even work together in the field of trade and the economy and overall just let bygones be. I understand that the subject of this matter
is is kind of fringe.
First, the observations that led to this conclusion: a lot of what we are arguing over seems to be differences in preference having to do with nature/
our nature. To me this is a taxing and incessant argument as nature is inherent and how, if we were to allow ourselves to be practical, we work,
function, apply ourselves. That you are conservative, oriented towards toughness, carrying a tendency to be practical, and oriented towards
independence is no more your fault than anyone being born with a tendency to like safety, protocols, inventories, predictability, and words, and
harmony, and lists. I would argue that some of these differences only manifest as "beliefs" because we humans argue "subjects" and get caught up in
"feelings" and believe things really are about Tim and Todd "being this way". My argument is that it could be, not that it is but that it could be,
nothing to do with all of us rats in a bin and more to do with forces pulling us this way and that, and the second we (casually) begin to discuss this
as a possibility, the sooner we can go "oh yeah, so Tim really wasn't doing this to hurt my feelings, we are just not letting it go or looking at the
more practical issue. Here we are still hurt over the fact that someone thinks their way is better." Its not a way. Because maybe there are
Why is this important? It could be that those with instinct, those that are pulling away, those who currently are arguing over "vaxxes" "social
preferences" and whatnot are what it takes for humankind to survive a cataclysm, and it would be a travesty were we to override this because "someone
did something politically incorrect" "we fear them because they can deal with unsafe issues" or "they hurt our feelings." So why a species divide?
Well simply, it wasn't us it was them; the more someone's intrinsic traits such as preferring safety and harmony pull one in the direction of building
worlds where all your waking hours are consumed with defeating an enemy, that which reminds you of lack of safety, the more dangerous it becomes were
we to continue to look at this as political power, or something we need to be arguing to begin with. With this understanding, he can pull himself
into his world of safety, he has every right, and we become a non threat because hell, like any of us care about him? 😁.
I propose that I dont care who wins, his continued outbursts from this point forward are just him expressing his hurt at himself, we can diffuse it by
reassuring him we dont give monkeys rear end, and we can continue to just be, but ultimately he has much to deal with, and we have much to reassure
him of. He does have some good traits. And I am not all that concerned about his interpersonal life.
edit on 1-12-2021 by TheReaversChain
because: (no reason given)