SUV plows into christmas parade in Waukusha WI. Shots fired too. 1 hr north of Kenosha.

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: BrujaRebooted
a reply to: Xcalibur254

Why would he be fleeing from the police, when the police werent chasing him? That makes zero sense!

One of the videos shown immediately after the incident showed the police chasing the red SUV. That's why everyone in social media thought Brooks was chased...because that's what our eyes told us.

If I find the clip, I'll post it.

In the below video, the police "chase" vehicles are about 1min20sec behind Brook's SUV. I suppose they were reacting to him running over people, instead of chasing after him from a crime scene, into the parade?

a reply to: BrujaRebooted

Why would he be fleeing from the police, when the police werent chasing him? That makes zero sense!

Just because someone is running away from the cops does not mean that the cops were chasing them.

People often flee the scene of a crime because they know the cops are coming, and they want to be gone by the time the cops arrive.

originally posted by: JacKatMtn
a reply to: OccamsRazor04

The DA's office in Milwaukee is trying to save face from letting him go for $1k a few days ago....

I wouldn't see him making BAIL anytime soon....

one only needs 10% of bail. he should be facing 43 counts of attempted murder, with a deadly weapon grievous bodily harm and terrorism.

why didn't he blow his horn to get people out of the way?




oh and no bail bondsman is gonna touch this i bet.

a reply to: BrujaRebooted

Reading comprehension is important. Once again, I said fleeing a crime scene. Criminals tend to try to leave the scene of a crime before police show up. When they do so it is called fleeting the scene of a crime.

This idiot has a history of doing this. He once punched a woman and ran her over with the same vehicle. He should have been already locked up. Its just insane that he was released on 1000$ bail. There is nothing stopping him from doing this again. chicago.cbslocal.com...

originally posted by: Justoneman
No way you should make that your priority in a situation such as this one.

Reactionaries often overreact, it's why they're reactionaries, in this case their overreaction is to beg for more government.

scumbag deserves the death penalty

The Waukesha police have issued a statement that confirms no one was chasing Brooks.

What we know so far indicates that Brooks entered the parade route while driving at high speed. At some point, he decided to plow through a march unit. He then broke through a crowd control barrier, and a police officer fired several shots at his car. His social media account indicates he professes to be a BlackLivesMatter supporter, and he has a dislike of white people. As to the degree to which that social media persona is real or fake, your guess is as good as mine. We can also conclusively rule out the stupid story flacked by Cupp that he was fleeing some other crime and that said flight had anything to do with him killing people in a parade.

redstate.com...

originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: elementalgrove

Once again, I never said anything about a police pursuit. He was however fleeting the scene of another crime.

Your use of the word 'fleeing' makes it sound like he was being pursued and lends credence to the ridiculous narrative being pushed by the MSM that this was a simple 'mistake' made by someone 'in a hurry to get away' from the big bad po-lice..

He had simply left the scene of another crime. That does not mean he was speeding away. This was pure, intentional evil, and the POS should be put down like the dog that he is.

originally posted by: smurfy
...should any state have a death penalty?

Should any State NOT have the death penalty for P'sOS like this??

originally posted by: carewemust
One of the videos shown immediately after the incident showed the police chasing the red SUV.

Very badly worded...

It was one cop - on foot...

That's why everyone in social media thought Brooks was chased...because that's what our eyes told us.

If I find the clip, I'll post it.

No, it is what the MSM was yammering about.

It took me more than a few watches to even notice the person running after the SUV on foot was a cop.

a reply to: tanstaafl

The way I interpret it is that the Police are saying that this was not a terrorist attack because he did not plan it out ahead of time, but they're not saying that it was any sort of mistake. It was still completely intentional. He just didn't wake up that morning knowing that he was going to do it.

a reply to: tanstaafl

Fleeing the scene of a crime is a common phrase that rarely implies a police chase.

At this time intent still isn't known. However it's not crazy to think this guy would be trying to put as much distance between himself and the scene of the original crime before police showed up knowing that he would be going back to jail if caught.

Regardless, the fact that he caused this tragedy during the commission of another crime actually makes things worse for him.

One thing I haven't heard much about is the barricades. They already had barricades set up to block off the parade route. Maybe in the future, Police need to start using stronger barricades that actually prevent vehicles from driving though, as opposed to weak barricades that are really nothing more than a 'Do Not Enter' sign.

I can't believe I woke up this am and turned on the news which I never do anymore, I just wanted to check.

Sure enough, first local news, not a single mention of Waukesha...
Then I turned on CBS national news, NOT A SINGLE MENTION.

I turned it on expecting to see what I saw but it still really bothered me. The state run news really is the enemy of the people...

a reply to: Xcalibur254

This is merely an assumption, but I think that yes he was fleeing away from the scene of the 'domestic disturbance' to get away before the cops arrived, but he was also still enraged by whatever had just taken place. Then, as he was fleeing that area, he saw the parade, and instantly decided to take out all of his anger on the unsuspecting people simply enjoying the day.

It's possible that timing played a big role in all of this. Maybe if the altercation (domestic disturbance) had taken place 30 minutes earlier, or later, this may not have happened.

originally posted by: BrokenCircles
a reply to: tanstaafl

The way I interpret it is that the Police are saying that this was not a terrorist attack because he did not plan it out ahead of time, but they're not saying that it was any sort of mistake. It was still completely intentional. He just didn't wake up that morning knowing that he was going to do it.

I understand that is what the police actually said, but that is not what the MSM is pushing (which was my point).

Regardless, final declaration of what he deserves stands.

originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: tanstaafl

Fleeing the scene of a crime is a common phrase that rarely implies a police chase.

Keep repeating whatever you need to make yourself feel better about supporting - intentionally or not - the ridiculous MSM narrative.

originally posted by: Bunch
a reply to: Bloodworth

Ironic that you mention this when 7 out of the 10 states in the top 10 in crimes are Republican controlled states with some of the harshest criminal laws.

Ahahahahaha
Aaaaaahahahahahaha
Thanks for the holiday week comic relief!