Put This in Your File

A tyrannical, drunk-off-power, anti-human force has clawed its way to the top of the hierarchy. The level and capability of surveillance, the unilateral worldwide mandates which have dictated whether or not a person can continue his/her livelihood and what they must wear in public, the blatant misinformation and conflicting, nonsensical measures, the antipathy for anyone not stepping in line, the inability or refusal of any governing force to pursue those responsible for funding, creating, and spreading a pandemic but rather to blame families for celebrating holidays together, the encouragement of turning on one’s neighbor, the “rules for thee” prevailing attitude, the weaponization of ideas, the assigning labels such as “domestic terrorist” to those with conflicting ideas, the files and information gathered on parents standing up for their childrens’ futures, (I could go on) betrays evil intent over simply incompetence; our leaders are only hiding behind the veil of incompetency. This unraveling is quite deliberate.

The word lockdown has erstwhile been reserved for inmates in a prison; now governments are threatening their citizenry with it.

We are all born with certain inalienable rights that no man can take from us. The right to our own body and the right to breathe and eat and feed our family is ours and ours alone.

(Spoiler: Good wins, God knows)
thanks for reading

Thanks for speaking so eloquently the jumble of frustration so many of us feel.

I don't say this lightly when I say Epic Rant.

And, yeah, He does don't He.

The society we are seeing evolve reminds me of what I heard of as the mindset back in Germany in the thirties and forties. People brainwashed to believe they were superior if they followed in the path that the furor set for them.

a reply to: zosimov

Said it before and I'll say it again....

Given the illusion of a moral high ground, people can do the most inhumane and immoral things happy and confident that they are in the right.

Nobody sets out to join a cult.
They just feel like they've found their own kind of people.

a reply to: The GUT

Nice to see you, GUT, and thank you; glad you enjoyed the rant. That felt good to write--must have been festering for awhile.
(And yes, I have total faith in the true Lord--notice how those who lord over the earth do it through force and coercion while God gives us the freedom to follow our own will, or His)

a reply to: zosimov

“Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience.”

― C. S. Lewis

a reply to: Tulpa

I think you're right--given "permission" or orders from the top, there's a sadist that loves to come out in so many.

a reply to: DBCowboy

I love the quote and also its author.
CS Lewis was the man.

a reply to: zosimov

My favorite...



We must picture Hell as a state where everyone is perpetually concerned about his own dignity and advancement, where everyone has a grievance, and where everyone lives the deadly serious passions of envy, self-importance, and resentment.
C. S. Lewis

I plead guilty as charged...

a reply to: olaru12

It's a good one. I've had more and more grievances lately, and life has been more and more hellish.

It's much more pleasant and just as much a part of reality when I remember all I have to be grateful for.

I'm off to hunt down my favorite CS Lewis quote now

Ah, here it is:

(Mere Christianity, Chap 9--"Charity."
The rule for all of us is perfectly simple. Do not waste time bothering whether you 'love' your neighbor; act as if you did. As soon as we do this we find one of the great secrets. When you are behaving as if you loved someone, you will presently come to love him. If you injure someone you dislike, you will find yourself disliking him more. If you do him a good turn, you will find yourself disliking him less.

And

The difference between a Christian and a worldly man is not that the worldly man has only affections or 'likings' and the Christian has only 'charity'. The worldly man treats certain people kindly because he 'likes' them: the Christian, trying to treat every one kindly, finds himself liking more and more people as he goes on — including people he could not even have imagined himself liking at the beginning.

This same spiritual law works terribly in the opposite direction. The Germans, perhaps, at first ill-treated the Jews because they hated them: afterwards they hated them much more because they had ill-treated them. The more cruel you are, the more you will hate; and the more you hate, the more cruel you will become — and so on in a vicious circle for ever.

have a good weekend, olaru!

a reply to: zosimov

Thanks for the rant zozimov . I love reading your writing. I totally agree with you about the funding , creating and spreading a pandemic . Why that is not the absolute most important thing in the world right now is beyond me . It’s clear as day to me and maybe I’m nuts but the way I see it is dr Fauci and the USA government gave millions of our tax money to ecohealth alliance and they in turn gave it directly to the wuhan lab to do gain of function testing . Specifically taking covid from bats and introducing it into humans . Something that wasn’t possible before they created it in a lab . Then it escapes the wuhan lab and the outbreak starts at the wuhan wet market , wow that makes a ton of sense since it escaped from the lab . Please someone correct me if I’m wrong .
I am totally with you z , I’d like to see all involved pay the price for their crimes against humanity . I don’t want to hear the word covid ever again until those guilty of their crimes are sentenced

When will the end come ?
As in the days of Noah.

a reply to: zosimov

Nice rant very well said, however

(Spoiler: Good wins, God knows

Why does god let all this happen in the first place then?

a reply to: surfer_soul
Hi surfer soul

According to my beliefs, this is what free will does. If only we were better to one another none of this would happen, but we still routinely pick love of self over love of God and, by extension, love of our neighbor.

Evil is here because we've all chosen it at some point or another and some will never turn away from it and only get more and more base.

a reply to: Thenail

Thank you; great comment. I think you've zeroed in on the crux of my rant. I agree with everything you wrote, including a real desire to see those responsible for crippling the world be brought to justice.

a reply to: DBCowboy

And now with guys like Mark Zuckerberg, Jack Dorsey, and Sundar Pichai, we have tyranny dictated by robber barons. My brothers and sisters, we are living not in a blitzkrieg type of fascism like that of nazi Germany, but a darker, more sinister fascism. It is growing like a cancer, one day at a time, until it consumes and destroys the host body.

originally posted by: zosimov
a reply to: Thenail

Thank you; great comment. I think you've zeroed in on the crux of my rant. I agree with everything you wrote, including a real desire to see those responsible for crippling the world be brought to justice.

Then you might find this of interest...

www.abovetopsecret.com...

originally posted by: zosimov

According to my beliefs, this is what free will does. If only we were better to one another none of this would happen, but we still routinely pick love of self over love of God and, by extension, love of our neighbor.

Evil is here because we've all chosen it at some point or another and some will never turn away from it and only get more and more base.

I certainly feel some culpability for the state of affairs and try not to forget the man in the mirror.

The love of many will grow cold it was said. We all see it. We all have to struggle against the hardening of the heart---especially in the days ahead.

a reply to: The GUT

What culpability do you feel for the state of affairs?

A tyrannical, drunk-off-power, anti-human force has clawed its way to the top of the hierarchy.

What part did you or anyone on these boards play in the above? And if someone tells me we should have voted so and so I’ll smack them in the face. The only thing I can imagine is that you, me, and the op have contributed to the system by taking part in it. But even so it’s not like we’ve had much choice, we are products of our environment to a large extent as well as victims of propaganda/brainwashing. Anyone who acts or try’s to live differently is subject to ridicule and disdain, we learn this from a young age and success is measured by wealth accumulated rather than personal growth and achievements. I don’t blame people for their desires and imagined needs because these things have very much been instilled into them. They are even taught it’s ok to gain at the expense of others as long as those others can’t do much about it.

For years I have felt a strong urge to get off grid and live as self sufficiently as possible. To get away from the rat race and have no part in it. But even this simple goal is almost impossible to achieve legitimately without first getting your snout in the sty and your paws on plenty of that cash...don’t get me wrong it’s not wealth or the wealthy that are the problem, it’s what some people are willing to do to become so. That and the lust for power and control is what drives all this madness.

I have to admit it’s been a wonder to see how far technology has come, and the marvels it can truly do for us. It too has its dark side and like a trap it has lured so many of us in until we have become completely dependent, and then bam. It has us, we can’t function without it in our lives. In comes the open air prison that is the smart grid and smart cities, CBDC’s an UBI tied to your social credit rating.

Like the WEF said “you will own nothing and be happy about it” as usual though, it was only a half truth.

a reply to: zosimov

Kind of expected rant about 'current situation', but where were ranters like this back in the day when I was trying to tell about this kind of future to people? These same people pointed and laughed, and called truthspeakers all kinds of vile names, that are now ranting about being SHOCKED about what's going on.

I have been WAITING for a long time for this kind of stuff to happen; I didn't know the details of HOW it was going to happen, but this has been predicted for a long time, it was just the sudden nature of pushing the agenda forward such a big leap that surprised me. People have been knowing about this stuff for decades, trying to tell people not to have a family, not to be complacent, but alert, not to trust, but look at what the governments are actually doing, and so on.

However, what's on TV was more important, what celebrity did what with whom to whom was more important, believing the news and media and official story was more important. Only people that have been asleep for a long time can be this shocked and ranty about the expected.

This kind of rant doesn't really do much more than say 'hey, current situation is unpleasant' without exposing the agenda or the people behind the agenda, without seeing the big picture; the current situation is just a tiny grain of sand in the whole evil agenda TPTB are continuously unfolding upon this planet, and HAVE BEEN DOING IT FOR DECADES (and actually, probably centuries, because they don't see time the same way or limit their vision to a mere few years or decades).

There's also a bit of confusion going on..

..has clawed its way to the top of the hierarchy

Clawed? Its way? Who are you talking about?

What hierarchy do you mean? There are overlapping structures and infrastructures of power, resources, wealth and ability to control the world. There's the governmental side, the corporate side, the military-industrial complex, the wealthy families, the Bilderberg Group and .. well, the list is pretty big. So what hierarchy are you talking about?

To be on top of a governmental hierarchy, for example, isn't the same as being any kind of higher entity than human beings. Human beings are right below the Creator, and governments exist below human beings. A president of a 'country' is usually really just a 'president of a government'. Government needs the consent of the governed to have any power.

So being the president of USA, for example, does not make anyone more valuable entity or even higher in the normal power hierarchy than a regular human being - the power comes from people having been duped to consenting to being governed by 'legal system' of governments, so that way, the president becomes a more powerful entity than a 'person' (which is just legal fiction that people sadly lawfully identify as).

Another point about this 'clawed its way' - think about it historically. What do you mean by 'clawed its way'? Pushing other people aside or killing them? Do you mean there has been a sudden shift in power from good to evil?

I hate to be the bearer of disappointing news, but if you look at all this historically, the evil entities that would want to 'claw' anywhere, have always been at the 'top of the hierarchy' (whatever this means). The wealthy and powerful families, bankers, psychos and such groups have always been at the handle of power, for the very reason, that good people, regular people or just human beings have no psychotically obsessive need to control others, so they wouldn't even think of 'clawing their way' to any top position. Only powerhungry megalo-maniacs are obsessed and lust power like that enough to do it, so that's what happens every time; regular people give way to the obsessed psychos that want to control others, as those obsessed freaks have the most motivation, determination and will to be the 'top' (whatever this means).

You can't get to 'the top' by being a considerate, compassionate human being with no enormous ambition and ego.

This means, even if we just look at it logically, that those kinds of people are always 'clawing their way to the top', because no one else is ambitious enough to grow claws like that.

Let's clear up some more confusion..

The right to our own body and the right to breathe and eat and feed our family is ours and ours alone.

First of all, you have it backwards; we don't magically have a 'right to our own body', but the right COMES from ownership, and by default, we own the physical body we utilize and inhabit. From this ownership, all the other rights also arise.

Right to breathe? That's not much of a right, because you can't stop doing it, and if someone else stops you from doing it, you can't exist in the physical body, it will die. It's more a necessity and requirement than a right. Obviously you do have 'the right to breathe', but it's a bit impotent to mention it specifically as a RIGHT; you might as well include 'right to a heartbeat' or 'right to own skin molecules. Sure, they are rights, but not very powerful thing to mention as rights.

Same goes with 'right to eat' - except that it's a bit more questionable one. To eat, you need food, and you don't have an unalienable right to food, as stupid as it sounds. Food is something external to your body - if you own food, you have right to do whatever with it, including eating it, but it's not an inherent right to any food, especially food that osmeone else owns.

Right to eat is meaningless if you don't own food, and if you own food, it's meaninless to mention that you can eat it, because OF COURSE you can eat it if you own it.

There's no such right as 'to feed your family'. Your family is not part of your body, you do not own your family, and by default, you don't own food to 'feed your family with'. Therefore, 'feeding your family' has never been, and can never be a right, and thus isn't one. Where do you think rights come from and how do you think they are defined? Do you think anything you want to do is a right?

'Feeding your family' involves OTHER people, each of which has their OWN rights, so they might choose to not eat even if you want to feed them. Then what? Do you have the right to FORCE-feed some family? Does 'owning' a family create some kind of right to 'feed' someone? You have the right to give food to anyone, if you own that food, regardless of family status, so again, it's useless to even mention 'family' or 'feeding'. Giving food is not the same thing as 'feeding'. When you use a word like 'feeding', the receiver of food is rendered completely passive.

In any case, I hope I have cleared up some of the confusion here - 'feeding some family' is no more right than 'healthcare' is, because it doesn't come from your ownership of something, it involves other people and their consent and will, and so on.

I do wish people would research what rights actually are and where they come from and WHY they are unalienable, so they wouldn't be listing all kinds of weird trivialities and other oddities that have nothing to do with rights, as rights.