It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
a reply to: underpass61
The difference being we DO NOT WANT our tax dollars funding an invasion of our borders, where you seem just fine with it. Maybe you and people who think like you could voluntarily double your tax contribution since you support this?
originally posted by: FunshineCD
Nobody wants "open borders" Show one source from anybody that suggests that?
originally posted by: MDDoxs
originally posted by: ATruGod
originally posted by: MDDoxs
Is this an armed and hostile force?
Would make it easier if they were...Now we have to pay for them to live in Our country as they continue to breed and grow their numbers. An invasion is an invasion.
Almost sounds like you are referring to vermin or pests.
Assholes with no pride or moral compass cheer on illegal immigration as if it were some human right. I'd say don't be that guy, but for you, it's a bit late.
originally posted by: network dude
a reply to: MDDoxs
that's odd then. You are for legal immigration, against illegal immigration, and against open borders, yet in a thread about protecting the borders, you post negative posts, but claim to be totally on board. It's almost as if you are trolling just to be a dick.
originally posted by: MDDoxs
originally posted by: network dude
a reply to: MDDoxs
that's odd then. You are for legal immigration, against illegal immigration, and against open borders, yet in a thread about protecting the borders, you post negative posts, but claim to be totally on board. It's almost as if you are trolling just to be a dick.
Nothing odd about it.
I just like to poke fun at this sensationalized and dramatic news pieces that everyone gets worked up into a frothing fervor over. Did you miss my funny picture of the sea container?
Secure the border. Properly process those seeking legal immigration. Grant access along defined channels - merits, humanitarian or general acceptance quotas. The erection of a sea container wall, and the use of militaristic language is radicicolous, and is only used to rile up the unwashed masses. This is the US for goodness sake, not a base in Afghanistan.
I can agree with something, but still poke fun it. Take this instance, I agree with you, but I am more than happy to make fun of you while doing it.
originally posted by: network dude
originally posted by: MDDoxs
originally posted by: network dude
a reply to: MDDoxs
that's odd then. You are for legal immigration, against illegal immigration, and against open borders, yet in a thread about protecting the borders, you post negative posts, but claim to be totally on board. It's almost as if you are trolling just to be a dick.
Nothing odd about it.
I just like to poke fun at this sensationalized and dramatic news pieces that everyone gets worked up into a frothing fervor over. Did you miss my funny picture of the sea container?
Secure the border. Properly process those seeking legal immigration. Grant access along defined channels - merits, humanitarian or general acceptance quotas. The erection of a sea container wall, and the use of militaristic language is radicicolous, and is only used to rile up the unwashed masses. This is the US for goodness sake, not a base in Afghanistan.
I can agree with something, but still poke fun it. Take this instance, I agree with you, but I am more than happy to make fun of you while doing it.
[snip] Got it.
originally posted by: MDDoxs
originally posted by: network dude
originally posted by: MDDoxs
originally posted by: network dude
a reply to: MDDoxs
that's odd then. You are for legal immigration, against illegal immigration, and against open borders, yet in a thread about protecting the borders, you post negative posts, but claim to be totally on board. It's almost as if you are trolling just to be a dick.
Nothing odd about it.
I just like to poke fun at this sensationalized and dramatic news pieces that everyone gets worked up into a frothing fervor over. Did you miss my funny picture of the sea container?
Secure the border. Properly process those seeking legal immigration. Grant access along defined channels - merits, humanitarian or general acceptance quotas. The erection of a sea container wall, and the use of militaristic language is radicicolous, and is only used to rile up the unwashed masses. This is the US for goodness sake, not a base in Afghanistan.
I can agree with something, but still poke fun it. Take this instance, I agree with you, but I am more than happy to make fun of you while doing it.
[snip] Got it.
[snip] Hurray!