How about the real science of climate change

From ice core samples to carbon 14 dating none of which support the latest push to destroy populations and countries with all the climate alarmism. The following short video will show you the actual history of temperature going back over 10,000 years. Why science is not used instead of made up computer models is beyond me unless the agenda is to wreck society and send us all back to a time when it was sorely inconvenient. youtu.be...

I only listen to the folks that have a degree in one of the REAL sciences .
Not climatologists.
Climatologists records only go back to 1925.
Real science goes back millions.

The people who brought us the lie of man made climate change will send their lackey's here shortly to tell you how wrong you are for not believing in the religion of Climate.

a reply to: 727Sky

Here's a message from COP26.



I wasn't a particular fan of this guy ..... funny how things change.

a reply to: 727Sky

People seem to love to believe the great Eugenic lie.

This is excellent, thank you for for this info!

No proof Humans affect the Climate, but the Climate affects Humans !!!🤣

Aren't We actually still coming out of an Ice Age and going into a Solar Minimum?

originally posted by: 727Sky
…………The following short video will show you the actual history of temperature going back over 10,000 years.

These ice cores actually only tell something about the temperature of the Greenland ice sheet 10,000 years ago. They don’t tell anything at all about what was happening on the other 99.6% of the Earth’s surface. Global warming—as the name implies—has to do with an average global increase in temperature, not just a regional variation. Regional temperature variations (plus and minus) in temperature are always larger than the global trend. Mathematically it has to be that way.

Not sure what you think this data is supposed to show.

originally posted by: 1947boomer

originally posted by: 727Sky
…………The following short video will show you the actual history of temperature going back over 10,000 years.

These ice cores actually only tell something about the temperature of the Greenland ice sheet 10,000 years ago. They don’t tell anything at all about what was happening on the other 99.6% of the Earth’s surface. Global warming—as the name implies—has to do with an average global increase in temperature, not just a regional variation. Regional temperature variations (plus and minus) in temperature are always larger than the global trend. Mathematically it has to be that way.

Not sure what you think this data is supposed to show.

Thanks for the laugh!

That was the funniest thing I read all day!

Plus there is tons of proof it really is the Sun. Yet, the liars want you to believe it is that evil carbon that naturally occurs on Earth and not the intense Radiation from the Sun. Nor is it the ebb and flow of the Sun's intensity that they are willing to admit.

originally posted by: xuenchen
No proof Humans affect the Climate, but the Climate affects Humans !!!🤣

@ClimateRealists

Meanwhile, Pelosi bill includes $2.25 BILLION for the Climate Force Gestapo...


H.R.5376 - Build Back Better Act

Bet their uniform will be brown shirts.🤡

a reply to: Justoneman

Plus there is tons of proof it really is the Sun.

Here's the average number of wet days in Australia from around 1900 compared to solar activity, in this case sun spots. It's just a 120 year coincidence that keeps on coincidenting.





From This Thread

originally posted by: 1947boomer

originally posted by: 727Sky
…………The following short video will show you the actual history of temperature going back over 10,000 years.

These ice cores actually only tell something about the temperature of the Greenland ice sheet 10,000 years ago. They don’t tell anything at all about what was happening on the other 99.6% of the Earth’s surface. Global warming—as the name implies—has to do with an average global increase in temperature, not just a regional variation. Regional temperature variations (plus and minus) in temperature are always larger than the global trend. Mathematically it has to be that way.

Not sure what you think this data is supposed to show.

ok first show me EXACTLY WHAT the "earths mean temperature" is supposed to be

if you had PAID ATTENTION in statistics and probability class (what is used to make mathematical models ) you need an ACCURATE MEAN BASELINE to determine what , how severe, and (in this case) how fast the deviation happens.

without that your "model/computer simulation" is based ALREADY ON A PRE CONCEIVED BIAS.

in short getting what you want out of it by what you put into it.

now after that i will more show what a ignorant/foolish post you did by pointing out...
NOT ONE CLIMATE PREDICITON MODEL HAS BEEN RIGHT (OR EVEN PREDICTIONS) .
in fact even with a short term known meteorological event called hurricanes the "predictions" from number to specific number of different types HAVE BEEN WRONG for decade or more.

lets even take your "mathematical claims" even further to torpedo your argument

MULTIPLE ONES by "experts" have been predicting multiple dates the earth would be not fit for life and the oceans would rise to engulf costal cities around the world to depth of statue of liberty / Effie tower (depending on location ).

last i checked NYC (for one) is still quite capable of supporting humans and not looking at deep see fish next to me (unless what i am eating).

so sorry but all around your "science" is anything but

your proof is laughable

and your "Experts" (btw greta is not one) would be fired for incompetence out of any grade school science class
scrounger

Seems this site has some information papers that those looking for the real science might be interested in.

a reply to: Gothmog


In that Case this Man foots the Bill .



www.youtube.com...

originally posted by: Justoneman
The people who brought us the lie of man made climate change will send their lackey's here shortly to tell you how wrong you are for not believing in the religion of Climate.

Our governor (JB Pritzker /IL) is excited about being invited to the huge U.N. Climate Change summit, ongoing in Scotland. The heads of state have left...and now governors and others who want to capitalize off this latest craze, are visiting.

Pritzker goes to Europe: www.chicagotribune.com...

So are these truly myths ?

0:00 - 01:41 - Introduction
01:41 - 06:36 - It is a problem, but it’s not the end of the world
06:36 - 09:26 The positive impact of global warming
09:26 - 11:13 - Myth 1: small islands are doomed
11:13 - 15:21 - Myth 2: extreme weather is on the rise
15:21 - 18:30 - Myth 3: climate lockdowns are the solution
18:30 - 21:51 - Myth 4: electric cars will save us
21:51 - 23:50 - Myth 5: polar bears are dying out
23:50 - 27:29 - Myth 6: cutting out meat will save the planet
27:29 - 29:55 - Myth 7: increasing wildfires
29:55 - 40:07 - What’s the solution?
40:07 - 40:45 - Conclusion

As the COP26 summit meets over the next couple of weeks in Glasgow, we can all expect to be bombarded with disaster scenarios, replete with stories about our species’ imminent demise. Over the last couple of days, we have had Boris Johnson warning that it is “one minute to midnight” and Prince Charles claiming that this is “literally our last chance saloon”. And of course, Greta Thunberg has already made a few appearances of her own, accusing politicians of “pretending to take our future seriously” and saying that COP26 will “lead us nowhere”.

Bjorn Lomborg takes a different view. His latest book, ‘False Alarm: how climate change panic costs us trillions, hurts the poor, and fails to fix the planet’ sets out his argument that, although climate change is a real problem and is mostly man-made, the panic and alarmism is counter-productive.

Real climate science is easy to find. Tony Heller has some for everybody.

originally posted by: EndtheMadnessNow

@ClimateRealists

Meanwhile, Pelosi bill includes $2.25 BILLION for the Climate Force Gestapo...

Good grief. That's just plain robbery of the taxpayers money.

The ice ages happen in cycles, roughly every 125,000 years. At the peak of the Eemian Melt about 125,000 years ago, the ice sheets in Greenland had melted and sea levels globally were 6-10 meters above what they are today.

Therefore, Earth has to complete its cycle and match the temperatures of the Eemian melt.

Any politician demanding money to "stop global warming" is robbing the taxpayers. They can't stop planet earth from matching the warm conditions of the Eemian melt. It is a natural cycle that the planet must complete.

If Pelosi is demanding $2.25 billion to stop planet earth from completing its cycle to match the Eemian melt, then Pelosi is robbing the country for something she can't stop. What's she going to do? Does she plan to jet out into space to stop the earth's revolution around the galaxy?

a reply to: 727Sky

So what happens when a load of volcanoes go off and cause an ash cloud blanket in the northern hemisphere at the onset of winter. Does this seem to be a prevalent theme in ice core samples before dramatic cooling?