Rittenhouse trial is being set up for unrest

originally posted by: JinMI
Jack Posobiec Twitter

Making some comments on the jurors. I don't know how he could access this type of info so take it work a grain of salt.

ETA:

Two jurors holding decision up, outright citing backlash, per US Marshal in Kenosha

More: Worried about media leaking their names, what will happen to their families, jobs, etc

If 2 jurors are afraid to vote, can they not bring back 2 alternates? the judge did tell them to it's possible to be called back, and to continue not watching reports.

a reply to: vonclod

Sure.

I mean I think so.

Would they?

originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: JinMI

Hung Jury in the making !!!😧

Mistrial !!!!😧

That can't be a good thing..all the natives are already restless

a reply to: ThisIsSarcasm

Leave your name, location and next of kin if you try to attack and kill somebody in WI.

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: vonclod

Sure.

I mean I think so.

Would they?

I have no idea, but it sounds like they might not vote their conscience, out of fear.

a reply to: vonclod

In my experience, no. Unless the juror asks to be dismissed for some reason or gets sick. They have no way of knowing which juror/jurors are holding out. The jury is probably sending notes out to the judge giving him basic progress not telling him who is holding out.

The first jury I served on was a hung jury and they never asked us who voted which way. After the judge called a mistrial I did get a phone call that was basically a polling call asking me how close the vote was. But I don't think in a criminal case they are allowed to ask until after a mistrial is declared. I may be wrong but that was my impression at the time.

originally posted by: TomCollin
a reply to: ThisIsSarcasm

Leave your name, location and next of kin if you try to attack and kill somebody in WI.

I think that "new" poster is just playing.

originally posted by: Khaleesi
a reply to: vonclod

In my experience, no. Unless the juror asks to be dismissed for some reason or gets sick. They have no way of knowing which juror/jurors are holding out. The jury is probably sending notes out to the judge giving him basic progress not telling him who is holding out.

The first jury I served on was a hung jury and they never asked us who voted which way. After the judge called a mistrial I did get a phone call that was basically a polling call asking me how close the vote was. But I don't think in a criminal case they are allowed to ask until after a mistrial is declared. I may be wrong but that was my impression at the time.

Ok, thank you for that. I have no idea how it works when there's an issue.

originally posted by: vonclod

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: vonclod

Sure.

I mean I think so.

Would they?

I have no idea, but it sounds like they might not vote their conscience, out of fear.

I would certainly hope that they would omit themselves then. But hey, no idea what they are thinking.

Judge and jury are back....apparently Judge is playing "Trivia Time" with the jury.


So odd lol.

a reply to: xuenchen

Screeching is their Modus Operandi though. They have found that if an area is Democrat enough, they can shriek long enough and throw out the right combination of virtues to affect the outcome. They have found this court in particular is largely immune to their BS and they don’t like it

They know if they have to go head to head with us using facts and objective reasoning, they lose. If they can make it about emotions including fear, or swap the narrative to compare XYZ with ABC, they can convince at least 40% of people they actually have a valid argument

We all know they are (mostly) bat excrement crazy, but before the past week or so I think a lot of independent voters still had some “good will” for them and had been extending the benefit of the doubt to them. But, after watching them break their backs defending a pedophile 20 years older than his intended victim has all but assured the gains we saw in VA translate elsewhere

It has also shown our need to stick together and have flawless documentation of the facts, especially if you are smart and go about armed

No verdict tonight.

Jury breaking till tommorow

Another fun fact while waiting for tomorrow.

The Kenosha Riots/Looting spree was based on MSM lies about the guy shot by police for no reason.

But he had a knife and tried to stab a cop.

And then the Government Leaders decided to soft-enforce and slowplay/micromanage the laws and let the mobs blow free.

Now we see what goes there 😎

ROFLMAO

Mark and Patricia McCloskey are in Kenosha County by the courthouse 🤣🤣🤣

originally posted by: RMFX1
a reply to: JinMI

If they were holding it up based on potential backlash only I'm sure they would be removed and replaced by 2 of the spare jurors they have on the 'bench'.

Thank-you. It's irresponsible for Jack Posobiec to report about 2 wimp jurors, without telling us what options are available....like you just did.

a reply to: xuenchen

Perfect timing for the refresher. Thank-you!

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: xuenchen

Perfect timing for the refresher. Thank-you!

Add too the Governor refused an invite from Trump to send in the National Guard right away 🦃

a reply to: JinMI


" Kenosha Marshal Reveals Why Two Jurors are Hesitant to Come Forward with Rittenhouse Verdict: They are Afraid of ‘Backlash’ "


You just Knew this was going to Happen , The LEFT Despises Justice . LOCK and Load Patriots !





trendingpolitics.com... knab/

a reply to: xuenchen

Why is the Defense formally requesting a mistrial at this point, and not 3 days ago, when it was first revealed the FBI's drone footage had been kept hidden from the Rittenhouse defense team?

Source: twitter.com...

A withheld FBI HD Drone video-clip: twitter.com...

Wouldn't it be more satisfying and precedent-setting if the Jury ruled Kyle Rittenhouse "Not Guilty"? (Day #2 of Jury deliberations is Wed 11.17.2021.)

Maybe the mistrial request has been written, but not yet formally requested? Can it be requested if/after Kyle is found "guilty"?