As FDA Panel Endorses Pfizer. "outweighed by the benefit of the vaccine"

As the FDA Panel Endorsed Pfizer vaxs for youth under 5/11 they continue to claim that the youth under 11/5 pose no threats from myocarditis as that is not a major.

Because according to the FDA panel. Pfizer data showed that their vaccine for 5/11 youth is 90.5% effectvice. The vaccine outweighed by the benefit of the vaccine than the concern of myocarditis.

FDA has trusted the Data from Pfizer.

FDA Panel Endorses Pfizer COVID-19 Vaccine for Kids 5-11

The data submitted for the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine analyzed information from about 2,250 study participants, ages five to 11. The data shows that 1,518 received the vaccine and 750 who got a placebo.

The children who received the vaccine were given a 10 microgram dose of the mRNA vaccine, and were vaccinated again three weeks later. The researchers found that the vaccine was 90.7% effective at preventing a COVID-19 infection.
There were also no cases of severe COVID-19 reported and no study participants developed multi-system inflammatory syndrome (MIS-C), a rare inflammatory condition tied to COVID-19.

While pushing Pfizer Vax for Youth they will be blaming any reports of heart inflammation or myocarditis on Covid.

You have a greater chance of myocarditis When You Get Covid Not by the Pfizer Vax

Still, “myocarditis does not appear to be something that is a major risk in this group,” Dr. Adalja says. The risk of myocarditis is also “much greater” when someone actually contracts COVID-19, Dr. Russo points out. Overall, the risk of myocarditis is “outweighed by the benefit of the vaccine, especially with prevalence of infection as high as it is,” Dr. Adalja says. The vaccine can also help protect children from long haul COVID symptoms that doctors are still learning more about, Dr. Russo says. “Long COVID can be quite disabling,” he says. “I’ve been extraordinarily concerned about long-term consequences to the brain, heart, lungs, and other organs.”

How many times have we already this line past year now?

Scientists at the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) said on Friday that the likely benefits of giving the Pfizer (PFE.N)/BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine to 5 to 11 year olds clearly outweigh the risks of rare cases of heart inflammation.

originally posted by: HawkEyi
How many times have we already this line past year now?

Scientists at the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) said on Friday that the likely benefits of giving the Pfizer (PFE.N)/BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine to 5 to 11 year olds clearly outweigh the risks of rare cases of heart inflammation.

Apparently these assholes are of the opinion bigger is better?

Being that perhaps they need their eye sockets enhanced with a natural remedy like oh IDK a fist before rearranging the jaw pattern to make the left side protrude far like royalty (the sledge jaw from in breeding) and a large knot on the forehead so they can mimic the majesty of the mythical unicorn?

Perhaps that is what they are secretly asking for?

I'd like names of all those who support this, in case it goes bad. If it goes bad, I think those who pushed this should stand trial, and be punished. This land of no accountability seems nice, until kids start dying. At some point, an adult needs to stand up.

a reply to: HawkEyi

90.7% effective at preventing a COVID-19 infection.

90.7% effective against a virus they are less likely to get in the first place.

That is if we are to believe what they had been telling us for over a year.

Since their story keeps changing. I guess it is just their modified version of a squeeze chute. A way to keep us moving in the direction they want us moving in, while keeping us restrained.

I just hope the final destination is not the slaughter yard.

ok . . . so they admit that the vax induces myocarditis.

and children, who were already virtually immune to corona, did not seem to suffer from myocarditis. And further did not get corona . . . but they were already virtually immune to corona

a reply to: HawkEyi

Y’all are right, listen to that voice in your head saying “they are all trying to get us”, that’s definitely not psychosis.

a reply to: HawkEyi

youtu.be...

Fast forward to 4 hours and 19 minutes and watch for 5 minutes. They FDA admits that the vaccine kills more people than it saves. 71x more likely to have a heart attack in the fully vaxxed group. 50% mortality rate. This is a global genocidal event people and the FDA knows damn well what this vaccine is doing to people. 1 in 1000 chance of myocaraditis from 1 shot. 1 in 317 for 2 and 1 in 25 for people with 3 shots. Make this information Viral!

Aciiidbath.

originally posted by: Aciiidbath
a reply to: HawkEyi

youtu.be...

Fast forward to 4 hours and 19 minutes and watch for 5 minutes. They FDA admits that the vaccine kills more people than it saves. 71x more likely to have a heart attack in the fully vaxxed group. 50% mortality rate. This is a global genocidal event people and the FDA knows damn well what this vaccine is doing to people. 1 in 1000 chance of myocaraditis from 1 shot. 1 in 317 for 2 and 1 in 25 for people with 3 shots. Make this information Viral!

Aciiidbath.

I couldn't help but notice that the comments on that video are turned off.
Can't have people discussing the bad parts.

5/11 soon becomes 9/11 😎

a reply to: HawkEyi

The whole "panel" was just a BS show - they were already rolling out the packaging and materials.

FDA Panel Pretends They are Deliberating Vaccines

a reply to: MDDoxs

Does this mean you are one of those people with no internal monologue?

I am asking that you explain the reasoning behind your reply. Specifically how it relates to the topic of the thread. I am just not seeing it - Thanks in advance.

a reply to: NightSkyeB4Dawn

They always seem to be keep changing the effectiveness and yet still seem to be sticking to their favorite number between 90% 95%..

a reply to: MDDoxs

And here you are jumping off defending Big Pharma as usual.. Because you still view the mRNA jabs as super safe right? they are safe right because MSM and the "Health experts" said so right?

Compared to the traditional vacancies for other viruses which had being worked on for years? i am not sure exactly why you are heavily shilling for Big Pharma.

Let alone for a company like Pfizer with known offensives in the past. If you are going to trust Pfizer knowing its track history by all means go for it.

a reply to: HawkEyi

This bring the phrase money talks and BS walk to a different new level, we will force the jab on the littler children even if the will be killed or maimed for life, because big pharma says is all good and safe.

We do not have an FDA but just another lapdog to paharma.

originally posted by: MDDoxs
a reply to: HawkEyi

Y’all are right, listen to that voice in your head saying “they are all trying to get us”, that’s definitely not psychosis.

Ok a serious question, to you or anyone else with medical experience... how could they test the efficacy of the vaccine on kids when kids rarely get covid? To me that's like testing an hiv or cancer vaccine on kids as they statistically have such low cases anyhow.

I get that asymptomatic still rings all the alarm bells in pcr testing if they are carriers but my question is the testing as it was never said to prevent the disease only lessen symptoms. If kids barely have symptoms what are they looking for?

Surely our governments can't be pushing a new vaccine on kids just to save a few of us old folk.

originally posted by: Aciiidbath
a reply to: HawkEyi

youtu.be...

Fast forward to 4 hours and 19 minutes and watch for 5 minutes. They FDA admits that the vaccine kills more people than it saves. 71x more likely to have a heart attack in the fully vaxxed group. 50% mortality rate. This is a global genocidal event people and the FDA knows damn well what this vaccine is doing to people. 1 in 1000 chance of myocaraditis from 1 shot. 1 in 317 for 2 and 1 in 25 for people with 3 shots. Make this information Viral!

Aciiidbath.

Except that's not what Jessica Rose says, she doesn't use those figures.

In total, there were 6 myocaraditis related deaths. Which is actually about 6 times lower than you would expect to be caused by Covid itself.

a reply to: HawkEyi

The numbers seem to say that 150ish patients were infected in spite of vaccination, but the study doesn't mention if their transmission factor was significantly reduced.

originally posted by: MDDoxs
a reply to: HawkEyi

Y’all are right, listen to that voice in your head saying “they are all trying to get us”, that’s definitely not psychosis.

Jesus Christ dude, can't you take the #ing boot out of your mouth long enough to look at just a few facts?

How deadly is Corona virus with regard to children under 18?
Are there any side effects with the vaccine in children?
Do the risks outweigh the benefit?

And for the bonus question, knowing how low the chances are that children will be affected at all by the virus, why is there such a push to get them vaccinated with a drug that we know for a fact doesn't work very well after about 8 months?

If you bothered to look at things from a human perspective and not from the "I must protect the narrative at all costs", you may start to see some reasons why some people are sceptical. If not, use KIWI, I hear the taste is smooth.

originally posted by: TzarChasm
a reply to: HawkEyi

The numbers seem to say that 150ish patients were infected in spite of vaccination, but the study doesn't mention if their transmission factor was significantly reduced.

but how do you quantify that? Just like how to you quantify how much lessened the severity was on breakthrough cases when some people get really sick, and some not so much, even unvaxxed? Honest question.