It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Scubalicious
When I say your phrase in an Indian accent itβs even funnier ! π€£π
originally posted by: xuenchen
Are they still counting "deaths" from people who actually died from something else but had "with RONA" stamped on the papers ?
The whole Rona thing and all the confusion, changes and chaos is like the movie 50 First Dates.
π΅βπ«
originally posted by: all2human
a reply to: carewemust
vaccines have been discontinued for far far less in the past.
Fully-Vaccinated are Decreasing. Covid-19 Infections are Decreasing.
originally posted by: DanZoller
Coronavirus tends to be highly seasonal peaking in winter with 10 times the cases as in summer. So I wouldn't be holding my breath just yet.
originally posted by: Gothmog
Fully-Vaccinated are Decreasing. Covid-19 Infections are Decreasing.
How right you are , an most likely didn't even know it.....
originally posted by: anonentity
a reply to: carewemust
Or this. It has been decided to reduce human carbon emissions on this planet by a few individuals of great power and wealth. It is a worldwide plan, a few small countries may be out of the loop but most are agreed. The only sure way is a fast depopulation to get it over with. Since modern warfare is out of the question as it would destroy what you are trying to preserve the plan decided on was this.
Create a virus in the lab to promote a worldwide panic. The virus would not have the ability to mutate it would quickly spread and would not get out of control. It was enough to create a panic. The vaccine rollout was the sucker punch as it would destroy immune systems over time, by the eighth dose you should have got the kill shot. If it went too fast people would get upset, this would coincide with bad winters where fuel supplies were low and food was hard to get, then the deaths have deniability. What went wrong? not a lot
originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: carewemust
So are you suggesting that a change in a definition (of who is fully vaxxed or not), is somehow protecting people from a disease?
originally posted by: DanZoller
originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: carewemust
So are you suggesting that a change in a definition (of who is fully vaxxed or not), is somehow protecting people from a disease?
A person is fully vaxxed when the vaccine in their body still has over 50% effectiveness. The new Lancet study found after 6 months Pfizer is less than 50% effective. So a person who has taken 2 doses of Pfizer 3 weeks apart but has not taken another dose after 6 months is not fully vaxxed because the effectiveness of Pfizer in their body has dropped to below 50% effective at preventing disease.