I keep seeing articles claiming that hydra vulgaris (brown hydra) were put in the vaccines.
I stand by my initial assertion that the organisms are a fungus that came from sloppy lab work or a contaminated environment. Whomever made the
slide had probably eaten lunch, didn't use proper hygiene, transferred bread fungus to the slide, and then analyzed patient samples. Here is a
picture showing Rhizus fungus compared to the vaccine samples:
So, why wouldn't it be hydra? Well, let's look at the big picture:
1. General Biology of Hydra...
They are not tolerant of heavy metals, but they can thrive in even highly eutrophic (low oxygen) water. They can live at temperatures from near
freezing to 25°C."
"They cannot tolerate salt water."
"Green and brown Hydra can be kept in a refrigerator in jars for two to three weeks without feeding or water changes. After a few days without
feeding, the Hydra will begin to rise to the surface for easy collecting with a pipet."
("Working With Hydra", pg 5)
Direct link to pdf:
So, hydra vulgaris doesn't tolerate heavy metals, or saltwater, or live without feeding for 3 weeks, or survive freezing temperatures.
The vaccines contain heavy metals and saline, and they are stored well below freezing with a shelf life much longer than 3 weeks. They wouldn't
waste the time and effort to put an organism into a vaccine that it can't survive, and all of the hydra would be floating on the surface after a few
days. It would be visually obvious that the vaccines had contaminted growth in them.
People are free to disagree, but I stand by my original assertion: its a fungus of some kind, likely Rhizus, and it stems from poor medical practices.
The other anomalies
in the vaccines are also from sloppy medical practices. The rings they show are air bubbles refracting light. They are
made from placing the cover slip down flat versus at an angle. The colorful objects are glass dust refracting light, again from the cover slip. They
are thin glass, stored 50-100 in a box. They rub together and glass dust accumulates, which makes its way into the patient sample. Its sloppy work.
One has to question the sincerity of the reporters and "doctors
" pushing the fear porn. Anyone with experience using a microscope knows
these things. Additionally, they would recognize geometric crystals as powder from the gloves, rather than a microfluidic device.