a reply to:
Jaellma
I wish Mr. Peterson well in his attempts, but he may have failed to recognize one opponent in this fight: the AMA. No names for obvious reasons, but i
know of multiple doctors who have confided in me personally that the AMA is "breathing down their necks" over not being excited about the vaccine. I
have advised my own doctor that I have no intention of taking the vaccine and he is fine with that. My refusal, along with the grounds on which I
refused, are now documented in my medical file: specifically that I feel the potential long-term side effects, unknown at this time due to a lack of
long-term studies, outweigh any risks I am taking by not receiving the vaccine.
Ivermectin is 40 years old, and a quick check on
Drugs.com shows Ivermectin to be a relatively safe
drug with no serious interactions and few moderate interactions, as well as few major side effects. The complaint from the
CDC seems to be based on reports of people using veterinary versions of Ivermectin. Now, I
ask any of you with enough neural capability to generate conscious thought, if someone is constantly told that a disease is deadly, hears about a
potential treatment for said disease, and is prevented form obtaining said treatment through normal means, why is it surprising in the least that they
might try a different method of obtaining a drug that they believe will save their life?
The same thing happened with hydroxychloroquine. It is an old drug as well, one with few side effects and few interactions, really only
contraindicated in people with heart conditions. Many doctors reported success using a hydroxychloroquine cocktail; the CDC then went through clinical
trials that substituted hydroxychloroquine alone for the actual cocktail used, and then reported that the drug did not work. From there, some idiot
tried to use an industrial material similar to the drug and killed his fool self.... and we're back to why wasn't he allowed to use actual
hydroxychloroquine? Would that not have been safer than using something meant for aquariums?
And all because we're supposed to take a vaccine that the very manufacturers and the CDC admit is a dismal failure? To combat a disease that has a
dismal fatality rate in the first place?
As far as I am concerned, the CDC, FDA, AMA, and the entire US AG office have demonstrated either their total incompetence or their complete
malevolence. None of them are worthy of any faith or trust. I will listen to my own doctor, thank you very much, and trust my own God-given immunity,
because I certainly cannot trust any of the organizations that claim to be medical experts.
There are two requirements to gain my trust: knowledge/competence in a field, and honesty about that field. One of those is sorely lacking in all of
the organizations I listed.
I'll say it again, and I will keep saying it until it sinks in: more people will die from the Chinese virus who never contract it than will die from
contracting it.
TheRedneck