It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Vaccine allergy? Experts say most past reactions not valid reason for exemptions

page: 1
14
<<   2 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 18 2021 @ 07:36 PM
link   
These so called "Top Experts, Health Experts" are just further proving to be nothing more than shills for Pharma. Of course they dont anyone to have a valid medical exemptions to be pushed.

According to this story. Even if anyone had a previous vaccine allergy that still isn't a good enough excuse for a exemption.So what is the proper medical exemption? none? just trust their expertise?

Vaccine allergy? Experts say most past reactions not valid reason for exemptions





Whether people have held off on getting vaccinated because of a past reaction, or are seeking an exemption to inoculation mandates, Hanna said a previous allergic response doesn't mean you can't get your shots.

Allergists across the country have safely inoculated most patients who come into their clinics, regardless of allergy history, she said. "Be it as an excuse or a misunderstanding or some miscommunication there, we are certainly getting a lot of referrals because of (vaccine rules)," said Hanna, an assistant clinical professor at McMaster University.


Just Trust the Experts...


The University is being supported by the gates foundation.

edit on 18-10-2021 by HawkEyi because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 18 2021 @ 07:41 PM
link   
a reply to: HawkEyi

"The University is being supported by the gates foundation."
gates whom in turn profits from the vaccine sales



posted on Oct, 18 2021 @ 07:56 PM
link   
a reply to: HawkEyi

This medical exemption should work. It's backed and supported by SCIENCE: www.cdc.gov...

35 million Americans qualify!


edit on 10/18/2021 by carewemust because: (no reason given)


+3 more 
posted on Oct, 18 2021 @ 08:04 PM
link   
a reply to: HawkEyi

A doctor I know spoke at length about this.

He told me I could take the vaccine.

So I started to take off my shirt and said, "Fine, jab me now but on one condition; I won't sign the waiver until 72 hours from now. If I'm alive, you'll be right and I'll be vaccinated. If I'm dead, my wife will own your ass and you'll have nothing."

"Now," I said, "How sure are you?"

He declined.



posted on Oct, 18 2021 @ 08:11 PM
link   
a reply to: HawkEyi

Well, the fact that the "health experts" are responsible for the third largest cause of death kinda undermines the whole credibility of the "most past reactions not valid reason for exemptions" statement, don't you think?

Seriously, #ing weatherforecasters are better than these clowns, sure, their prognosis are just as dodgy, but at least they don't kill as many people.


edit on 18 10 2021 by myselfaswell because: it's fun.


+6 more 
posted on Oct, 18 2021 @ 08:33 PM
link   
a reply to: DBCowboy

The issue that everyone is ignoring, is "informed" consent.

Since they admit there is still the possibility of getting the disease after vaccination, still the possibility of spreading and dying from it, the risk involved is mine to choose.

If I choose to take my chances with my natural immunity over the risk of a faulty vaccine result, that choice is mine to make. A true, my body, my choice decision.

To tell me otherwise, and to tell me I have no choice or right to an exemption is the same thing as telling me I am not a free citizen, but owned by the governmental system.

I am not making any excuses, and I am not requesting any exemptions. I am just not taking the vaccine. Stated and no need for any further discussion. If it becomes a requirement for my position, then they will just have to fire me.

I was warned this time was coming. I am prepared mentally, physically, and spiritually. To be honest, I am tired. Too tired to fight, but I will not comply. I will not fight but I will stand firm. I am not Ghandi, but i think I can do nonviolent resistance, well. Very well.



posted on Oct, 18 2021 @ 08:36 PM
link   


Top Experts, Health Experts

With "honorary" , non-earned , degrees .

edit on 10/18/21 by Gothmog because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 18 2021 @ 08:37 PM
link   

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: HawkEyi

This medical exemption should work. It's backed and supported by SCIENCE: www.cdc.gov...

35 million Americans qualify!



So, one out of ten?

Hell yea...completely on the up and up.



posted on Oct, 18 2021 @ 08:38 PM
link   

originally posted by: MykeNukem

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: HawkEyi

This medical exemption should work. It's backed and supported by SCIENCE: www.cdc.gov...

35 million Americans qualify!



So, one out of ten?

Hell yea...completely on the up and up.


So , the amount of folks that have allergies amuses you ?



posted on Oct, 18 2021 @ 08:40 PM
link   
Whenever I hear the media quote 'experts say' you can usually conclude its propaganda,bs or both



posted on Oct, 18 2021 @ 08:40 PM
link   
"Experts?"

You know what an "expert" is?

An "EX" is a has-been.

A "SPURT" is a drip under pressure.



posted on Oct, 18 2021 @ 08:40 PM
link   

originally posted by: Gothmog

originally posted by: MykeNukem

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: HawkEyi

This medical exemption should work. It's backed and supported by SCIENCE: www.cdc.gov...

35 million Americans qualify!



So, one out of ten?

Hell yea...completely on the up and up.


So , the amount of folks that have allergies amuses you ?


Erm, no.

The fact that the "authorities" think they can tell me what I believe is amusing to me.

Sorry, it's up to me and my informed decision and choice.

You don't agree?

Bro, if you haven't noticed already, I'm for FREEDOM, no matter the cost. Because the cost is less than the benefits.

I'm FOR exemptions. Not the BS they are trying to pull/.

ETA: Just saw your last post during refresh....I prefer "BSperts", has a ring to it.


edit on 10/18/2021 by MykeNukem because: f you



posted on Oct, 18 2021 @ 08:54 PM
link   


I'm FOR exemptions. Not the BS they are trying to pull/.
a reply to: MykeNukem
I was a hoping that I had misinterpreted your meaning .
We have a sayin , in the South , for the other kind that cannot be used on ATS .



posted on Oct, 18 2021 @ 08:57 PM
link   

originally posted by: Gothmog



I'm FOR exemptions. Not the BS they are trying to pull/.
a reply to: MykeNukem
I was a hoping that I had misinterpreted your meaning .
We have a sayin , in the South , for the other kind that cannot be used on ATS .


Indeed.

I'd die to protect whatever you say or would like to express or not express. Up to you.

I don't even know you....keep that in mind.




posted on Oct, 18 2021 @ 09:01 PM
link   
a reply to: MykeNukem




I don't even know you....keep that in mind.

Some would consider that a blessing.



posted on Oct, 18 2021 @ 09:04 PM
link   

originally posted by: Gothmog
a reply to: MykeNukem




I don't even know you....keep that in mind.

Some would consider that a blessing.


LMAO.

Same brother.

You'll need a special blessing just to put up with me (according to THE WIFE)

Shudder.




posted on Oct, 18 2021 @ 09:47 PM
link   

originally posted by: khnum
Whenever I hear the media quote 'experts say' you can usually conclude its propaganda,bs or both


If you can’t find a boba fide responsible person’s name to attribute to a quote, it’s guaranteed propaganda lies.

But then again, sometimes you can ascribe a name to the quote AND still it would be lies and propaganda. Take Nancy Pelosi, in April 2021, Nancy stated: “Nancy Pelosi: (10:31)
So here’s the thing. We cannot require someone to be vaccinated. That’s just not what we can do. It is a matter of privacy to know who is or who isn’t. I can’t go to the Capitol physician and say, “Give me the names of people who aren’t vaccinated so I can go encourage them to be, or make it known to others to encourage them to be vaccinated.” So we can’t do that, but you would hope that science would guide them to protect themselves, their family members, and be good colleagues in the workplace to get vaccinated. And the sooner that that happens, the better for everything.


www.rev.com...



posted on Oct, 18 2021 @ 09:48 PM
link   
This is dumb. If you had a reaction to penicillin, don't take Tylenol, amirite?



posted on Oct, 18 2021 @ 09:54 PM
link   

originally posted by: UnRepentantHarlequin

originally posted by: khnum
Whenever I hear the media quote 'experts say' you can usually conclude its propaganda,bs or both


If you can’t find a boba fide responsible person’s name to attribute to a quote, it’s guaranteed propaganda lies.



A Boba Fide person? Is that some kind of hardcore Star Wars fan club, for the Fett fans?

Sorry, but I ain't seeing myself out, folks



posted on Oct, 18 2021 @ 10:05 PM
link   

originally posted by: LordAhriman
This is dumb. If you had a reaction to penicillin, don't take Tylenol, amirite?


Actually, you do not take anything ELSE in the Cillin family of antibiotics, since Penicillins is the group name to begin with (edit: family and group being two different things here -- Amoxicillin is in the Cillin family, but not the Penicillins group) Technically, only two are used for medical use at all -- Penicillin V is the one most commonly prescribed for infections, and the other is Penicillin G -- drip antibiotic, AFAIK.

How do I know this?

Husband found out the Surprise Way he is anaphylactic allergic to Penicillins via a nasty body balloon-ish & swollen face, mouth & throat reaction to a Pen V. prescription.

Your analogy is wrong, because you cannot gamble on the component allergies. My older brother is also anaphylactic allergic, to eggs. He had reactions to vaccines before, diagnosis was evidently pretty obvious -- would you prefer he abstain from playing it absolutely safe, just to make you feel a wee bit safer? I think you know what the sentiment is, if you answer "yes".
edit on 10/18/2021 by Nyiah because: (no reason given)



new topics

top topics



 
14
<<   2 >>

log in

join