It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Xtrozero
originally posted by: litterbaux
Almost like it's becoming okay that the vaccine isn't working. If it doesn't work, why are we using a formula from a year ago and not working on a new version? I mean is there anything going on that anyone knows about around working on these new variants?
They definately have the cash on hand to get some of this started.
What is your definition of working or not?
originally posted by: litterbaux
originally posted by: Xtrozero
originally posted by: litterbaux
Almost like it's becoming okay that the vaccine isn't working. If it doesn't work, why are we using a formula from a year ago and not working on a new version? I mean is there anything going on that anyone knows about around working on these new variants?
They definately have the cash on hand to get some of this started.
What is your definition of working or not?
I'm saying the narrative seems to say it's okay that the vaccine isn't working. From my personal experience this is a change in narrative. Your milage may vary.
originally posted by: rnaa
originally posted by: litterbaux
originally posted by: Xtrozero
originally posted by: litterbaux
Almost like it's becoming okay that the vaccine isn't working. If it doesn't work, why are we using a formula from a year ago and not working on a new version? I mean is there anything going on that anyone knows about around working on these new variants?
They definately have the cash on hand to get some of this started.
What is your definition of working or not?
I'm saying the narrative seems to say it's okay that the vaccine isn't working. From my personal experience this is a change in narrative. Your milage may vary.
The question was how do you define 'working' - in this context?
Because I don't think you understand what a vaccine - any vaccine - actually does.
originally posted by: litterbaux
I'm saying the narrative seems to say it's okay that the vaccine isn't working. From my personal experience this is a change in narrative. Your milage may vary.
originally posted by: litterbaux
originally posted by: rnaa
originally posted by: litterbaux
originally posted by: Xtrozero
originally posted by: litterbaux
Almost like it's becoming okay that the vaccine isn't working. If it doesn't work, why are we using a formula from a year ago and not working on a new version? I mean is there anything going on that anyone knows about around working on these new variants?
They definately have the cash on hand to get some of this started.
What is your definition of working or not?
I'm saying the narrative seems to say it's okay that the vaccine isn't working. From my personal experience this is a change in narrative. Your milage may vary.
The question was how do you define 'working' - in this context?
Because I don't think you understand what a vaccine - any vaccine - actually does.
Unfortunately, I don't have time to bother you with the vaccination definition change, look it up yourself on your time.
To me, vaccinations meant you would not die or be harmed by a disease. You don't get a tetanus shot and think, well I'm 10% gonna die either way.
No, it means you are protected. So were they lieing my entire life or just the last year?
originally posted by: Xtrozero
originally posted by: Helious
Ah man, listen, for that demographic, the flu, bronchitis, neumonia, hell..... A really bad cold puts them in the same scenario.
There is no denying this virus is more deadly to a certain demographic than existing corona viruses. The question really is does the ends justify the means and I think I speak for most of the free world who is still able to critically think when I say, hell no.
Do you think a person can believe that the vaccine works and is as safe as any other while also being 100% against how the Goverment is being draconian in all this? We won when 85% of the high risk were vacced. After that it should had been if you want it or not and let the virus do its thing and spread like it will no matter what we do.
Read my foot note that I have had there for 2 years now...
originally posted by: Helious
Unlike the knowledge we have for the best known vaccines such as polio. These vaccines had NO human trials. There isn't a virologist or scientist on Earth that can speak about long term effects because there were no studies nor peer reviewed documentation.
originally posted by: rnaa
in reply to: madmac5150
The vaccines are NOT experimental.
You have had a year to get vaccinated without a mandate being imposed.
Had you taken that opportunity your community might well be living without all these restrictions by now.
originally posted by: rnaa
in reply to: litterbaux
Polio is definitely alive and kicking.
And vaccinations are MANDATORY before children go to school in all 50 states (not a Federal mandate). As are chickenpox and mumps and etc.
From Wikipedia: Polio Eradication - Herd Immunity
All Covid-19 vaccines are about 90% effective at preventing infection