It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Is this proof Ivermectin should be an option?

page: 2
21
<< 1   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 11 2021 @ 11:23 PM
link   
a reply to: SirHardHarry

~sigh~

One, ivermectin is a crossover drug and has many potential uses besides just an antiparasitic. Which you knew, but decided to just ignore because let's face it, you are a partisan hack.

Two, ivermectin has been used in not only other countries, but in the US itself as not only a useful prophylactic in the case of Covid-19, but a quite useful tool when combined with other treatments.

Three, please link for me where any of the current "vaccinations" are FDA approved besides under the Emergency Use Act. I won't bother waiting for that, since you and I both know that none of the "vaccinations" have passed Stage 3 trials by the FDA.

Fourth and finally, your use of the term "free to consumer" just shows your complete ignorance of not only economics, but politics in America in general.

Where do you think our Government gets its money from?

Narnia?

No, it is the taxpayers... the consumers.

A pleasure responding to you as always... now I feel the need to go take a shower.

~Shudder~



posted on Oct, 12 2021 @ 02:40 AM
link   
a reply to: MDDoxs
Maybe it's because many viruses are parasites? SARS-CoV-2 could be a parasitic virus?

Link to explanation
Rainbows
Jane



posted on Oct, 12 2021 @ 06:16 AM
link   

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: network dude

Anything that cure, prevents spread, provides a therapy or provides immunity should be discussed.


I've heard statements and anyone feel free to verify or deny,
If there is a solution that is already FDA approved, the eua that the current "vaccines" are authorized under can not be used?


I think that's the case, and we are going to find that all involved decided to operate on the Biden principal. The Biden principal is ignoring the law, and doing what you want, then once the law steps in, you smile, walk away, and count your money. Just as he did with the Rent moratorium. The Supreme court said it wasn't going to fly, but he did it anyway. And will get away with it for a bit. And suffer no repercussions from it. So why bother with silly laws either way.



posted on Oct, 12 2021 @ 09:21 AM
link   

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: network dude

Anything that cure, prevents spread, provides a therapy or provides immunity should be discussed.


I've heard statements and anyone feel free to verify or deny,
If there is a solution that is already FDA approved, the eua that the current "vaccines" are authorized under can not be used?


I think that's the case, and we are going to find that all involved decided to operate on the Biden principal. The Biden principal is ignoring the law, and doing what you want, then once the law steps in, you smile, walk away, and count your money. Just as he did with the Rent moratorium. The Supreme court said it wasn't going to fly, but he did it anyway. And will get away with it for a bit. And suffer no repercussions from it. So why bother with silly laws either way.


I like that, "The Biden Principal", I'll be using that one if you don't mind.

It is like the old saying, "It's better to ask forgiveness than to ask for permission." So you can knowingly break the rules then say, "Opps! Sorry, I made a mistake" or something along those lines.



posted on Oct, 12 2021 @ 10:55 AM
link   
a reply to: MichiganSwampBuck

with him, it's a bit worse. It's like killing the kid who parks your car and scratched the door, and knowing since your brother in law is the sheriff, nobody is going to ask any questions. Maybe not that dramatic, but close.

The law isn't even a speed bump, it's an after thought, followed by the chuckle of knowing you can just write yourself a pardon. I bet Hunter already has his.



posted on Oct, 12 2021 @ 12:56 PM
link   
a reply to: JinMI


originally posted by: JinMI
I've heard statements and anyone feel free to verify or deny,
If there is a solution that is already FDA approved, the eua that the current "vaccines" are authorized under can not be used?


From 21 U.S. Code § 360bbb–3 - Authorization for medical products for use in emergencies


(c)Criteria for issuance of authorization
...
(3)that there is no adequate, approved, and available alternative to the product for diagnosing, preventing, or treating such disease or condition;



posted on Oct, 12 2021 @ 01:01 PM
link   
a reply to: scojak

See, if that's the reason for all this, and it really was just a money grab, and lives were lost due to greed alone, I feel like that might be the thing that breaks the rust wire, that holds the cork, that keeps the anger in. (Pink Floyd reference)



posted on Oct, 12 2021 @ 01:04 PM
link   

originally posted by: Lumenari
They changed the actual definition of "vaccination" to call the current bunch of clot jabs a "vaccine."

Love your contribs Lum...

Question: I've seen this comment before from others.

I've seen for myself the change in the definition of the term 'herd immunity' they made last year, to eliminate any reference whatsoever to natural immunity, although after the uproar it caused, they changed it back to include the reference.

I'm wondering if this is easy enough to prove - did they actually officially change the definition somewhere? And if so, is this verifiable?
edit on 12-10-2021 by tanstaafl because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 12 2021 @ 01:11 PM
link   

originally posted by: MotherMayEye
a reply to: network dude

My daughter got the Moderna and recently got Covid. She was symptomatic when she tested and looked to be spiraling fast...faster than I was comfortable with. Anyway, I put her on the MATH+ protocol, right away, and she was 100% within 3 days. I had the ivermectin on hand ahead of time.

I am totally sold on the MATH+ protocol.

I'm sooooo happy to hear this, and your daughter is sooo lucky to have such a thoughtful parent.

Everyone should take heed. Take back your power over your own health. And, especially with this thing, if you get sick, do not under any circumstances go into a hospital unless you have your own doctor there that has your back and will treat you with these safe and effective therapeutics - otherwise, it is likely a death sentence to be admitted on your own.



posted on Oct, 12 2021 @ 01:16 PM
link   

originally posted by: SirHardHarry
a reply to: Lumenari
It's FDA approved as an antiparasitic agent in humans, not as an antiviral agent.

Irrelevant. It is approved, and has a well established safety record - it is safer than aspirin for gods sake.


Efficacy against covid looks positive but as of yet unproven and unauthorized due to limited and not so thorough real world trial testing.

Well, based solely on that it at the very least deserves the same EUA that Mercks Remdesivir was granted, considering it had already been shown to be much much more dangerous in recent trials... right? RIGHT??


Oh, and Merck makes ivermectin. So Pharma is in on that, too.

Nope, it is off patent, not even sure they manufacture it any more, but they definitely don't make money off it.

No, they wanted their $3k per treatment new drug to be used, and so it was the only one granted an EUA.

Anyone who played a role in this crime deserves the death penalty, and very likely anyone who blindly played along and/or condoned it as well.

Do you really want to continue defending and being associated with mass murderers?
edit on 12-10-2021 by tanstaafl because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 12 2021 @ 01:25 PM
link   

originally posted by: SirHardHarry
It's FDA approved as an antiparasitic agent in humans, not as an antiviral agent. Efficacy against covid looks positive but as of yet unproven and unauthorized due to limited and not so thorough real world trial testing.



How effective do they say the vaccines are today?

Doesn't look so positive, these days. But it's ok to determine the efficacy of the vaccines in real time -- and after authorization -- because...well, that's what the FDA decided.

I mean, let's not pretend the vaxxed have high scientific standards. Pah.



edit on 10/12/2021 by MotherMayEye because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 12 2021 @ 01:31 PM
link   
I follow MATH+ as well as one sister who has just gotten over covid & was given the monoclonal ABs.
She should have been taken Ivermectin more often since she is exposed to the virus every day at work.
I keep to myself pretty much except our outdoor sheepdog trials.

I have to get tested to compete in our next 2 events that start on Thur. & that sucks! I do NOT
want a swab up the nose & I cannot find a saliva test unless it's thru the mail & send back, not
enough time for that...the University will only test students or people who work there.

I am worried about the swab being contaminated or has GO...saw mentioning of that a while back
on here but I don't remember if it was true or not.

Cheers
Ektar



posted on Oct, 12 2021 @ 01:38 PM
link   
a reply to: tanstaafl

Another interesting *tweaking*, imo...

Before the Covid Jabs:


After the Covid Jabs:



posted on Oct, 12 2021 @ 01:53 PM
link   
a reply to: tanstaafl

Thank you! But I should have said the MASK+ protocol, not the MATH+.

Besides the Ivermectin, she took 100mg zinc, 1000mg Vit. C, 500mg Quercetin, 10mg Melatonin, and 4000IU Vit. D3 + K2 daily. Also, she did the gargle and nasal spray from the MASK+ protocol, too.

I was so tickled when I heard her voice the morning after she started the protocol...she sounded normal and she had sounded like total crap the day before. Her runny nose even dried up after 24 hours and she had her taste and smell back.

I know someone who had Covid, in July, and he still can't taste or smell.



edit on 10/12/2021 by MotherMayEye because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 12 2021 @ 03:00 PM
link   
a reply to: network dude

I honestly don't see how anyone who bothers to pay even the smallest bit of attention and look at this through sane eyes can think this isn't a money grab by big pharma and the medical industry and a power grab by the government fueled by the media. There are mountains of evidence suggesting that the gov't doesn't care if/when this ends, or likely doesn't actually want it to.

Political corruption, pharmaceutical corruption, hospital corruption, media corruption... it's all come together in one perfect storm, and the damage sustained will be great.



posted on Oct, 12 2021 @ 04:57 PM
link   

originally posted by: MotherMayEye


I know someone who had Covid, in July, and he still can't taste or smell.




glad to hear her recovery was fast. I have had friends with both ends of the spectrum. Some sick for weeks, and lingering issues for months, and others shake it off like a weak cold. I don't know if it's different variants,, different sickness altogether, or just different people are better at fighting it. But it's not something you can pinpoint with any accuracy.

I already do vitamins daily, and take melatonin at night. So I'm halfway there if I get it again. But I also heard that is sort of rare.



posted on Oct, 12 2021 @ 05:01 PM
link   
a reply to: scojak

So fascim or technocrats?

Pharmacracy?

Whatever it is, they are all coming together in a nice, neat, profitable bundle.



posted on Oct, 12 2021 @ 06:36 PM
link   
a reply to: JinMI

Well, a technocracy requires those in control to be experts. Those in charge are far from anything I'd put in that category.

I'd say they're going for Communofascism under the guise of Democratic Socialism.



posted on Oct, 12 2021 @ 06:48 PM
link   
a reply to: scojak

Hmm, sounds complicated


Perhaps we should get with the times, invent our own word.


Anti-Liberty Coalition



posted on Oct, 13 2021 @ 02:21 PM
link   
a reply to: network dude

I think you are very lucky to have acquired natural immunity and you should feel confident in your immune system.




top topics



 
21
<< 1   >>

log in

join