England accidently reveals death numbers .

It's not about gloating.

I'll be smiling as we will be past the problem and back to living life again.


a reply to: BrawleR

originally posted by: sighbul
a reply to: tanstaafl

Normally you'd be correct, but sadly not in the case of mRNA vaccines for Covid.

boriquagato.substack.com...

And the consequences going forward will be truly catastrophic.

Doom porn. Everything I've read said it is far less deadly - except, maybe, for the jabbed of course.

a reply to: chr0naut

SO you said

I put those words into Google, and did a search for them, along with "ardern".

I got no results at all.

SO I put the link in for you
Now you say

The video taken from the NZ Channel 1 Today Show, and both linked an quoted in the article, has what she said.

But I already knew that before you posted your original reply, because I actually read the article and watched the video prior to you providing the link to the misleading article.

Seems strange you had the link, you had the words being spoken in a video, coming out of her mouth and you denied the existence and want more.

Why deny finding the source of the quote?
Why not link to the video and express your opinion on it and the reporting?


Then you have the nerve to say

I really get annoyed that people use misquotes and plain fabrications to support their arguments. Much reporting, and especially that from US news sources, is biased and 'spun' to support specific viewpoints. It hold little adherence to the truth, and is usually revealed if you are a bit skeptical and actually check into what an article purports.

So saying you couldn't find anything is what? "plain fabrications to support your arguments."


Stay on your high horse all you want but you are just the same as those you claim to annoy you.

originally posted by: myselfaswell

originally posted by: MDDoxs
a reply to: anonentity

Lol based on the numbers presented, it was a more deadly period of time for those unvaccinated. 65,000 unvaccinated dead, or 37%.

Not sure what the article is trying to conclude here

Pretty straight forward;

30,305 people died within 21 days of having a Covid-19 Vaccine in England during the first 6 months of 2021.

And that you find this in any way funny indicates to me that you have serious mental health issues that need professional help.

Please dont equate people being jaded about life and death to mental health. You're not helping anything.

originally posted by: puzzled2
a reply to: chr0naut

SO you said

I put those words into Google, and did a search for them, along with "ardern".

I got no results at all.

SO I put the link in for you
Now you say

The video taken from the NZ Channel 1 Today Show, and both linked an quoted in the article, has what she said.

But I already knew that before you posted your original reply, because I actually read the article and watched the video prior to you providing the link to the misleading article.

Seems strange you had the link, you had the words being spoken in a video, coming out of her mouth and you denied the existence and want more.

Why deny finding the source of the quote?
Why not link to the video and express your opinion on it and the reporting?


Then you have the nerve to say

I really get annoyed that people use misquotes and plain fabrications to support their arguments. Much reporting, and especially that from US news sources, is biased and 'spun' to support specific viewpoints. It hold little adherence to the truth, and is usually revealed if you are a bit skeptical and actually check into what an article purports.

So saying you couldn't find anything is what? "plain fabrications to support your arguments."


Stay on your high horse all you want but you are just the same as those you claim to annoy you.

Google uses AI for pattern matching. The results it returns are not necessarily the specifics of what you put in the search field.

I searched for the occurrence of some specific text and Google did not find a match.

The only results returned all linked to the one news piece and were not valid because the article writer had made assumptions and was the writers interpretation of what was said by the PM.

Google did not return a result for the exact text I was searching for. The closest thing in the results was not valid when checked. I did get some results in Google, but not for what I was searching for, which was a very specific text, or a paraphrase of that very specific text.

a reply to: AaarghZombies

i think it said Clydside hospital had a twenty-five percent increase in patients admitted for Myocarditis, heart attacks. I wonder why?

a reply to: chr0naut

Oh my god give it up you even quoted from the damn link.
corrected your comment

Much reporting, and especially that from chr0naut sources, is biased and 'spun' to support specific viewpoints.

a reply to: puzzled2

The truth really does not matter anymore, what is perceived to be the truth is what matters. We are in a war situation, with propaganda flying from all directions. Truth is always the first casualty. The Jab is no longer the issue. We all have a point of view well-considered or ill-considered. What is a fact is that severe social breakdown is being caused by Government policy. The events which are happening will dwarf anything to do with whether a vaccine works or not. All perceived premature deaths will be blamed on those who pushed the vaccine whether it did or not.

You cant trust any data from the government period. I honestly can't figure out why we have thread after thread squabbling about it. Government releases and manipulates data to fulfill an agenda, they don't give a # about you whatsoever.

a reply to: anonentity

Today on ATS I have now seen 3 stories of people who have been maimed by the shots. The cop in Denver, the NBA player and now this poor girl. It is so sad.

Fauci & Pharma should be indicted for crimes against humanity.

a reply to: puzzled2

Does the 65000 include those who died since the pandemic began? Because there was no vaccine at that time.

a reply to: anonentity

Tiffany Dover is still dead from the vaxx.

originally posted by: scrounger

so if england is same as US (no reason to think it isnt) then those 65,000 is really 3,900.

There is no reason to think it is.