Covid vaccines are not effective, they give you AIDS and make you infertile

a reply to: AaarghZombies

In the UK 1 in 5 people are unvaxxed yet they make up 4 in 5 covid deaths.

That was averaged out from between Jan-July 2021......in case anyone wanted a little more info.

originally posted by: Itisnowagain
a reply to: AaarghZombies

In the UK 1 in 5 people are unvaxxed yet they make up 4 in 5 covid deaths.

That was averaged out from between Jan-July 2021......in case anyone wanted a little more info.

I've posted links to it on about a million threads. I think most of ATS has seen it by now.

For the curious.

That equates to 38,000 deaths.

a reply to: AaarghZombies
How many people were vaxed in January 2021?

Concerning the removed yt video titled

Here's an interesting video showing lab antibody tests after the first and second jabs.

Here’s a new link

Dr. Nathan Thompson checks bloodwork on vaccinated patient
rumble.com...

originally posted by: Itisnowagain
a reply to: AaarghZombies
How many people were vaxed in January 2021?

It's an average figure.

a reply to: natoshis

You'll be sterile and you'll be happy.

So both the corona virus and the vaccine both have infused HIV in the spike protein, so won't both cause HIV or whatever ailments or is somehow the vaccine the real danger?

originally posted by: AaarghZombies

originally posted by: SeaWorthy
a reply to: AaarghZombies

UK, January to July 2021.

500000 deaths
38000 unvaxxed
12000 single vax
640 double vax.

See my post above this one!

Over 2 million adverse reactions and those are the reported ones!

Covid-19 vaccine.
Result is presented for the active ingredient(s).
Total number of records retrieved: 2183912.

[link to www.vigiaccess.org]

That post is garbage. And those adverse reactions are mostly either incredibly mild of the kind you would expect to get with a flu shot or are unrelated to the vax. That database is reported reactions not confirmed ones. Seriously read it.

In the UK 1 in 5 people are unvaxxed yet they make up 4 in 5 covid deaths. Then number of people who have a serious reaction is less than a fraction of one percent.

So you are saying VigiAccess was launched by the World Health Organization (WHO)
Posted garbage?
And you as your own source it seems are more believable?

The way things are currently going, my thoughts are that a general sterilization would probably not necessarily be a bad thing. So much stupidity to get rid of.

originally posted by: TTU77
So both the corona virus and the vaccine both have infused HIV in the spike protein, so won't both cause HIV or whatever ailments or is somehow the vaccine the real danger?

They do not contain HIV..ffs

originally posted by: vonclod

originally posted by: TTU77
So both the corona virus and the vaccine both have infused HIV in the spike protein, so won't both cause HIV or whatever ailments or is somehow the vaccine the real danger?

They do not contain HIV..ffs

originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: natoshis

In regard to SARS-CoV-2 containing sequences from HIV, both sequences are published and making a comparison for similarities in the sequence is trivial using the online genomic search tool BLAST. You can do it for yourself, and see...

Here is the link to the sequence for Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 isolate Wuhan-Hu-1, complete genome (NCBI Reference Sequence: NC_045512.2) and here is the Human immunodeficiency virus 1, complete genome (NCBI Reference Sequence: NC_001802.1).

From either page, you could use BLAST or the "Find in this Sequence" links to compare and copy but additionally to make note of the locus of any similar sequences, and what they actually code for.

We would specifically be looking for the same protein being coded by the same sequence, a complete open reading frame (ORF) beginning with a start codon and ending with a stop codon, as a marker of true 'similarity'.

(to use BLAST, from one genome click the BLAST link and then, on the "Organism" field, type "HIV" or "SARS" depending on what your original selection was, and then pick one of the drop-down options, click the 'blastn' radio button, then click the BLAST button, then hang around for a fair while - perhaps two minutes, as until it runs).

There aren't any. The results will be "No significant similarity found" in every case.

So, the assertion that portions of HIV have been engineered into SARS-CoV-2, are utter BS - probably written by someone who has no idea that such a comparison is trivial to do, because they have no real science education.

So be warned and check your sources. Don't assume that because someone implies online that they are credentialed, that they are.

Covid-19 reportedly has HIV features and part of the HIV sequence, but not enough to trip a positive PCR test.

The keywords you found are "No significant similarity found" - That does not mean that a similarity does not exist. It has likely been obfuscated on purpose if its the case. It is a bioweapon after all, the mainstream media doesn't even deny that it came from a lab anymore
nypost.com... - Ex-CDC chief Robert Redfield explains belief COVID came from China lab
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov... - Did covid-19 come from a lab?

We also note that in the publication of the chimeric virus SHC015-MA15 in 2015, the attribution of
funding of Zhengli Shi by the NIAID was initially left out. It was reinstated in the publication in 2016 in
a corrigendum, perhaps after the meeting in January 2016 to reinstate NIH funding for gain-of-function
research on viruses. This is an unusual scientific behavior, which needs an explanation for.

From Unusual Features of the SARS-CoV-2 Genome Suggesting Sophisticated Laboratory Modification Rather Than Natural Evolution and Delineation of Its Probable Synthetic Route - zenodo.org...

>It shares significant similarities with smallpox, lassa, influenza, and HIV, but neither looks nor behaves like any of those.

archive.4plebs.org...

"Abstract: .. Our findings show that SARS-CoV-2 spike immunized mice antibodies cross-react with the HIV-1 Env protein. Cross-neutralization among the two viruses is uncommon, suggesting the presence of a non-neutralizing antibody response to conserved epitopes amongst the two viruses."

www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov...

If they weren't similar, why do the HIV-1 and SARS-COV-2 antibodies cross-react?

Non-neutralising antibody response to conserved epitopes amongst the two viruses.. that means your body cannot get rid of it. It keeps replicating until it overwhelms your immune system and your immune system shuts down, causing AIDS/immune deficiency.

Email to Dr. Fauci:
“Hello Anthony,

“This is how the virus was created.

“Intervirion Fusion. HIV-luc(ACE2)(500 ng of p24) was mixed with 1,000 ng of p24 of HIV-gfp particles incorporating ASLV-A envelope, SARS-CoV S protein, or both envelopes in PBS at 4°C for 30 min to allow binding. Virions were adjusted to the desired pH with 0.1 M citric acid. PBS, TPCK-trypsin (final concentration 10 ng/ml), CTSL, cathespin B (CTSB) (final concentrations 2 ng/ml) or CTSL buffer alone was then added. Recombinant CTSL (R&D Systems) was preactivated by incubation for 15 min at 10 ng/ml in 50 mM Mes, pH 6.0, on ice. Recombinant CTSB (R&D Systems) was preactivated in 25 mM Mes, 5mM DTT, pH 5.0, for 30 min at 25°C. After a 10-min incubation at 25°C, proteolysis was halted by the addition of 300 nl of DMEM10 containing leupeptin (25 ng/ml) and STI (75ng/ml). Virions were then incubated at 37°C for 30 min to allow membrane fusion. 100 nl of the virion mixture was added in quadruplicate to HeLa-Tva cells pretrated for 1 h with leupeptin (20 ng/ml). The cells were spin-infected and incubated at 37°C for 5 h.”

Fauci Email

Intervirion fusion.. Recombinant agent added.. Coronavirus. Sounds a lot like the chimeric viruses spoken about in archive.4plebs.org...
HIV-gfp particles incorporating ASLV-A envelope, SARS-CoV S protein, or both envelopes in PBS.

All 4 key bits of evidence align with the accusation made by the anonymous Level 4 Biolaboratory Infectious Agent Specialist that coronavirus was gain of functioned into a chimeric virus by using its recombinant nature and adding parts of HIV sequence onto the virus here. archive.4plebs.org...

Check my thread Evidence of lab leak and laboratory modification of coronavirus with segments of HIV protein for more conclusive proof in academic journal articles on SARS-COV-2 being a chimeric, recombinant coronavirus. - www.abovetopsecret.com...

originally posted by: natoshis

originally posted by: vonclod

originally posted by: TTU77
So both the corona virus and the vaccine both have infused HIV in the spike protein, so won't both cause HIV or whatever ailments or is somehow the vaccine the real danger?

They do not contain HIV..ffs

originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: natoshis

In regard to SARS-CoV-2 containing sequences from HIV, both sequences are published and making a comparison for similarities in the sequence is trivial using the online genomic search tool BLAST. You can do it for yourself, and see...

Here is the link to the sequence for Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 isolate Wuhan-Hu-1, complete genome (NCBI Reference Sequence: NC_045512.2) and here is the Human immunodeficiency virus 1, complete genome (NCBI Reference Sequence: NC_001802.1).

From either page, you could use BLAST or the "Find in this Sequence" links to compare and copy but additionally to make note of the locus of any similar sequences, and what they actually code for.

We would specifically be looking for the same protein being coded by the same sequence, a complete open reading frame (ORF) beginning with a start codon and ending with a stop codon, as a marker of true 'similarity'.

(to use BLAST, from one genome click the BLAST link and then, on the "Organism" field, type "HIV" or "SARS" depending on what your original selection was, and then pick one of the drop-down options, click the 'blastn' radio button, then click the BLAST button, then hang around for a fair while - perhaps two minutes, as until it runs).

There aren't any. The results will be "No significant similarity found" in every case.

So, the assertion that portions of HIV have been engineered into SARS-CoV-2, are utter BS - probably written by someone who has no idea that such a comparison is trivial to do, because they have no real science education.

So be warned and check your sources. Don't assume that because someone implies online that they are credentialed, that they are.

Covid-19 reportedly has HIV features and part of the HIV sequence, but not enough to trip a positive PCR test.

The keywords you found are "No significant similarity found" - That does not mean that a similarity does not exist. It has likely been obfuscated on purpose if its the case. It is a bioweapon after all, the mainstream media doesn't even deny that it came from a lab anymore
nypost.com... - Ex-CDC chief Robert Redfield explains belief COVID came from China lab
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov... - Did covid-19 come from a lab?

We also note that in the publication of the chimeric virus SHC015-MA15 in 2015, the attribution of
funding of Zhengli Shi by the NIAID was initially left out. It was reinstated in the publication in 2016 in
a corrigendum, perhaps after the meeting in January 2016 to reinstate NIH funding for gain-of-function
research on viruses. This is an unusual scientific behavior, which needs an explanation for.

From Unusual Features of the SARS-CoV-2 Genome Suggesting Sophisticated Laboratory Modification Rather Than Natural Evolution and Delineation of Its Probable Synthetic Route - zenodo.org...

>It shares significant similarities with smallpox, lassa, influenza, and HIV, but neither looks nor behaves like any of those.

archive.4plebs.org...

"Abstract: .. Our findings show that SARS-CoV-2 spike immunized mice antibodies cross-react with the HIV-1 Env protein. Cross-neutralization among the two viruses is uncommon, suggesting the presence of a non-neutralizing antibody response to conserved epitopes amongst the two viruses."

www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov...

If they weren't similar, why do the HIV-1 and SARS-COV-2 antibodies cross-react?

Non-neutralising antibody response to conserved epitopes amongst the two viruses.. that means your body cannot get rid of it. It keeps replicating until it overwhelms your immune system and your immune system shuts down, causing AIDS/immune deficiency.

Email to Dr. Fauci:
“Hello Anthony,

“This is how the virus was created.

“Intervirion Fusion. HIV-luc(ACE2)(500 ng of p24) was mixed with 1,000 ng of p24 of HIV-gfp particles incorporating ASLV-A envelope, SARS-CoV S protein, or both envelopes in PBS at 4°C for 30 min to allow binding. Virions were adjusted to the desired pH with 0.1 M citric acid. PBS, TPCK-trypsin (final concentration 10 ng/ml), CTSL, cathespin B (CTSB) (final concentrations 2 ng/ml) or CTSL buffer alone was then added. Recombinant CTSL (R&D Systems) was preactivated by incubation for 15 min at 10 ng/ml in 50 mM Mes, pH 6.0, on ice. Recombinant CTSB (R&D Systems) was preactivated in 25 mM Mes, 5mM DTT, pH 5.0, for 30 min at 25°C. After a 10-min incubation at 25°C, proteolysis was halted by the addition of 300 nl of DMEM10 containing leupeptin (25 ng/ml) and STI (75ng/ml). Virions were then incubated at 37°C for 30 min to allow membrane fusion. 100 nl of the virion mixture was added in quadruplicate to HeLa-Tva cells pretrated for 1 h with leupeptin (20 ng/ml). The cells were spin-infected and incubated at 37°C for 5 h.”

Fauci Email

Intervirion fusion.. Recombinant agent added.. Coronavirus. Sounds a lot like the chimeric viruses spoken about in archive.4plebs.org...
HIV-gfp particles incorporating ASLV-A envelope, SARS-CoV S protein, or both envelopes in PBS.

All 4 key bits of evidence align with the accusation made by the anonymous Level 4 Biolaboratory Infectious Agent Specialist that coronavirus was gain of functioned into a chimeric virus by using its recombinant nature and adding parts of HIV sequence onto the virus here. archive.4plebs.org...

Check my thread Evidence of lab leak and laboratory modification of coronavirus with segments of HIV protein for more conclusive proof in academic journal articles on SARS-COV-2 being a chimeric, recombinant coronavirus. - www.abovetopsecret.com...

An honest question for you... Do you have any kind of original thought or perspective regarding the subject matter, other than mass quoting and linking to questionable sites and sources?

a reply to: Kreeate

"An honest question for you... Do you have any kind of original thought or perspective regarding the subject matter, other than mass quoting and linking to questionable sites and sources?"

There's been a lot of that about on here, for quite some time...

Funny, I have both shots of the Pfizer and none of that has happened to me.

Because of age, I will be getting my booster in less than 5 months and I will do so without any concern of acquiring AIDS.

Makes no sense either. To what end? Surely the "afflicted" in this scenario would simply violently lash out at "them" should even 1% of this come true. What good is "depopulation" if the depopulator/everyone he or she cares about is dead anyway? Doesn't matter whether its AIDS from a shot or a bullet fired by one of those targeted in this hypothetical scenario, dead is dead

So I ask again, to what end?

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: Kreeate

"An honest question for you... Do you have any kind of original thought or perspective regarding the subject matter, other than mass quoting and linking to questionable sites and sources?"

There's been a lot of that about on here, for quite some time...

Yes but no one cares for individual opinions, its the evidence that counts. I've expressed my views regularly throughout my posts, you're just trying to diminish my credibility by resulting to a very poor ad hominem.

originally posted by: natoshis

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: Kreeate

"An honest question for you... Do you have any kind of original thought or perspective regarding the subject matter, other than mass quoting and linking to questionable sites and sources?"

There's been a lot of that about on here, for quite some time...

Yes but no one cares for individual opinions, its the evidence that counts. I've expressed my views regularly throughout my posts, you're just trying to diminish my credibility by resulting to a very poor ad hominem.

Right, so in all fairness to you, kindly link to peer reviewed evidence of all your claims please.

In the interest of evidence and all.

ETA: Incidentally, bitchute videos and twitter posts don't qualify. Nor do any other non mainstream "sites".

originally posted by: JBurns
Funny, I have both shots of the Pfizer and none of that has happened to me.

Because of age, I will be getting my booster in less than 5 months and I will do so without any concern of acquiring AIDS.

Makes no sense either. To what end? Surely the "afflicted" in this scenario would simply violently lash out at "them" should even 1% of this come true. What good is "depopulation" if the depopulator/everyone he or she cares about is dead anyway? Doesn't matter whether its AIDS from a shot or a bullet fired by one of those targeted in this hypothetical scenario, dead is dead

So I ask again, to what end?

They never cared about us, thats the flaw in your reasoning. You thought they cared about us.

They want 500 million globally. around 50 million in america by 2025.
Check the 2025 Deagel forecast yourself and explain why the population is projected to decrease from 300 million down to 50 million by 2025. justpaste.it... why would the population forecast reduce so much when its only been growing the last few years?

50 million is an easy number to control which won't cause a burden on infrastructure or for supplying healthcare, you're not needed. They have robots that can do your job better and they don't have to pay those robots.


I answered this before in more detail. I'm going to post it again here.

---
originally posted by: Kreeate
So your consensus is that the government wants to "kill and sterilize" everyone?
To what end?
---


To destroy the nuclear family.

To have human beings of the future grown by the Government as wards of the state as in Brave New World, for more control.

Because the world is overpopulated and cannot sustain continued growth at our current exponential curve.

Because humanity puts way too much of a carbon footprint on the earth.

Because the Earth will die if they don't reduce the carbon footprint significantly by 2030 -www.foxnews.com...

Because we haven't even started to make an effort. We're still building more and more coal mines and power stations. China is going on a rampage and showing no signs of something. Something has to be done, and corporations don't look like they want to slow down on burning fossil fuels or profits anytime soon. I think we're the expendable resource.

Dozens of new coal-fired power and steel plants in China announced during the first half of 2021, if built, would alone add 150m tonnes in annual carbon dioxide emissions, according to research group, Global Energy Monitor.

In May, the IEA said no new coal facilities should be developed if the world is to reach net-zero emissions by 2050.

www.democrats.org.au...

To ensure that the Elites power is never challenged again, when they can firmly surveillance and control 500 million across the whole world. There will not be another revolution if they succeed. This is the future www.youtube.com...

----
originally posted by: Kreeate
For what purpose?
What will this achieve? Who will benefit from this?
----


The Elites will benefit by making themselves richer from the crisis and by reducing the amount of "useless eaters" they have to feed and look after when theres no more work because of automation.

The Elites because they won't have to pay the 95% a living wage or a UBI and they can keep all the extra profit for themselves.

The Elites because they want to control humanity in a cyber polygon and social credit system similar to China has, but 7 billion people is too much to control. They want 500 million slaves who have no choice but to comply or die.

The Elites because they've wanted a one world government for years sustainabledevelopment.un.org...
To make people reliant on the state for a functioning immune system and for the right to work and to use services.


----
originally posted by: Kreeate
Who will clean up the aftermath?
---

The slaves who are still alive and healthy and haven't dropped off yet. Do you think they'll admit it? Nope. They'll deny it to the end and they'll blame peoples mass deaths on unvaccinated or a new virus (such as Marburg)


----
originally posted by: Kreeate
In other news, if your government wanted to kill you, you'd already be dead.
---

They dont want to kill too many too quickly, or make it too obvious that it was the vaccine. They introduce the vaccine to destroy your immune system so a virus can take you out, so they can blame it on the virus. That's how they get away with it and no one notices.


---
originally posted by: Kreeate
There are means and methods to "eliminate" people en mass... way, WAY beyond your wildest imaginations.
---

Not on a mass scale without causing a huge revolt or riot if they did it in a quick and effective way. It would be too noticeable. Some of the batches of vaccine were saline so people would legitimately question the instances of side effects when they had absolutely none, and to dilute the lethality of the injection even more by muddying the statistics of people who had it with placebo injections.

They didn't want it to be too lethal too quickly otherwise they wouldn't be able to profit off of us, and it would have araised far too great a suspicion. People would have started noticing before it was too late for them and they'd risk a huge uprising and revolt, if everyone was dropping like flies everyone would be against it. They've turned vaccination into a game of russian roullette, if you get one your only hope is in getting a saline shot (which I suspect is why some people do not exhibit magnetic effects after having the vaccine, but others do - if it isn't that some vaccine manufacturer ingredients are magnetic such as Pfizer and Moderna, and others such as Johnson&Johnson or Sputnik are not.


---
originally posted by: Kreeate
If the "powers that be" decided that the population should be reduced, they'd do it... blatantly and in your face and there would be nothing any civilian could do about it. There exists no need for a nefarious sterilization program. The government has no need to "tiptoe" around these issues. They do what they want, whether you like it or not.
---


No they wouldn't. That would risk an uprising and people noticing en masse that its the vaccines. It's already hard enough for them to play off the vaccine side effects as caused by the virus as it is and it isnt designed to be an immediate killshot.
The third or fourth jab is.


---
originally posted by: Kreeate
Slow, systematic elimination achieves nothing other than complicating logistics. Ergo... bollocks.
---

No it does not. They'll be making billions off of us as they kill us off slowly. They're bleeding us dry of all the money they can justify the state giving us on vaccination programs out of each countries budget before they kill us off. And they don't want to clean it up themselves, they want to do it slow enough so there'll be enough slaves still alive to clean up their mess and to bury and cremate the dead as everything falls apart.

originally posted by: Kreeate

Right, so in all fairness to you, kindly link to peer reviewed evidence of all your claims please.

In the interest of evidence and all.

ETA: Incidentally, bitchute videos and twitter posts don't qualify. Nor do any other non mainstream "sites".

Peer reviewed stuff is in my other posts already, have a look at the threads i've made and have a browse. You haven't even asked me to clarify anything so i'm not going to post anything for you.

Also the validity and veracity of a video doesn't depend on where it is sourced from - it can impact the credibility of the evidence but in this day and age of censorship, there is no fair debate about things. There is no objective unbiased presentation of evidence anymore, only censorship and platforms that host content that aligns to leftist views (parroting false narratives for virtue signalling, censorship, civil rights, social justice), and platforms that host content that aligns with rightist views (Freedom of expression, freedom of information, justice, truth)

originally posted by: natoshis

originally posted by: Kreeate

Right, so in all fairness to you, kindly link to peer reviewed evidence of all your claims please.

In the interest of evidence and all.

ETA: Incidentally, bitchute videos and twitter posts don't qualify. Nor do any other non mainstream "sites".

Peer reviewed stuff is in my other posts already, have a look at the threads i've made and have a browse. You haven't even asked me to clarify anything so i'm not going to post anything for you.

Also the validity and veracity of a video doesn't depend on where it is sourced from - it can impact the credibility of the evidence but in this day and age of censorship, there is no fair debate about things. There is no objective unbiased presentation of evidence anymore, only censorship and platforms that host content that aligns to leftist views (parroting false narratives for virtue signalling, censorship, civil rights, social justice), and platforms that host content that aligns with rightist views (Freedom of expression, freedom of information, justice, truth)

Erm... nope. Still no actual peer reviewed evidence. Because if there were any, the world would be a very different place right now. Try again.

a reply to: natoshis

I will caveat that most governments are using Covid to grow their power and reduce freedoms because most governments are run by asshole sh#tbags.

I will even caveat that the US government is using Covid to make it a socialist hellhole run by doorknob humping retards.

But I don't think they want to depopulate.

The logistics don't hold.

Even the little people are too essential.