posted on Sep, 27 2021 @ 05:15 PM
a reply to: surfer_soul
It was decided he put the ice back due to selfishness. Is that provable some how?
Do we have any way of knowing that is why he decided to put the ice back. If it's fair to assume selfishness,
Why is it unfair to assume the child had ice, candy or cookies at home?
No I don't think that warning labels shame the smoker. Perhaps they do, but I don't see why it matters to us.
This magical herb, that makes you more healthy even if you smoke it? ( I assume you would mention it can be eaten )
Amazing, No side effects no possible negative circumstances you could use it and operate heavy machinery, or do this that and the other thing? Great,
Maybe some politician will mandate it's use and we can all be happy.
Work (and life) for many is stressful, Stress is a bad thing. Some people choose not to use any substance that would in effect leave them feeling
noticeably intoxicated, Specially at work.
As far as an oxymoron, Yes perhaps he is wasting money. However If next time he wants to be able to buy the ice and smokes, He will have to work
harder. Maybe that is why 2 packs instead of one, Maybe for work he had to go somewhere they were more expensive and knew he needed them. Wait sorry
We will never know and should not even speculate.
Though what if he didn't smoke? Instead spent all his money on health herbs and equipment? Well no sorry that's more what-ifs, If only this guy
didn't smoke! Is an if-only better than a what-if?
edit on 27-9-2021 by aLaughingMan because: (no reason given)