You only die in the Hospital.

a reply to: Oldcarpy2

wikidiff.com...

originally posted by: imalitehaus
a reply to: Oldcarpy2

wikidiff.com...

Yes. I know.

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2

originally posted by: sciencelol

originally posted by: olaru12

originally posted by: Xtrozero

originally posted by: jerich0

This is not a vaccine. And you damn well know it, comrade..

What would you like to call it?

I don't know but it looks like a lot of members are putting their faith in medicine for barnyard animals.

www.abovetopsecret.com...

Stop . It won the nobel prize and has cured many diseases in humans and has been approved for human use for years.

You are a F###### liar

That was Avermectin. It won for treating human parasites.


"The 2015 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine - Press release" www.nobelprize.org...

You were saying something about lying?

LOL all you do is spread disinfo.

vermectin was discovered in 1975 and is approved for use in humans to treat infections caused by some parasitic worms, head lice and skin conditions such as rosacea. When taken in appropriate, prescribed doses it can be highly effective and is included in the World Health Organization's list of essential medicines.

originally posted by: sciencelol

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2

originally posted by: sciencelol

originally posted by: olaru12

originally posted by: Xtrozero

originally posted by: jerich0

This is not a vaccine. And you damn well know it, comrade..

What would you like to call it?

I don't know but it looks like a lot of members are putting their faith in medicine for barnyard animals.

www.abovetopsecret.com...

Stop . It won the nobel prize and has cured many diseases in humans and has been approved for human use for years.

You are a F###### liar

That was Avermectin. It won for treating human parasites.


"The 2015 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine - Press release" www.nobelprize.org...

You were saying something about lying?

LOL all you do is spread disinfo.

vermectin was discovered in 1975 and is approved for use in humans to treat infections caused by some parasitic worms, head lice and skin conditions such as rosacea. When taken in appropriate, prescribed doses it can be highly effective and is included in the World Health Organization's list of essential medicines.

"Vermectin"?

Just pointing out your own Disinfo in that (1) Ivermectin did not win any Nobel award it was it's precursor Avermectin and (2) that was for treating human parasites, not Covid.
LOL! LOL! Etc. Carry on. Zzzzzzz

a reply to: nonspecific

Just for the record have you noticed any people collapsing at your Jab clinic?

originally posted by: nonspecific
As long as being anti Vax and in denial of the severity of covid is fun for you then this will always be your stance on it.

It's a bit #ed up that your hobby is denying something that kills people don't you think?

So, do you deny that there have been many many people dying from the side effects of the vaccinations? Or is that your hobby?

originally posted by: Xtrozero

originally posted by: The2Billies

Yep the Democratic talking point of the day, calling a nobel prize winning, human life saving medication "a medicine for barnyard animals" because why? Could it be they don't want lives saved, to get rid of useless eaters, as it was genetically designed to do in a lab: kill the useless eater elderly using up retirement/social care/medical care funds; kill the useless eaters with multiple chronic health issues: with an acceptable number of collateral damage to the rest of the population. Helps to balance government budgets and gets rid of useless eaters for socialist/communist nations who only care about what is good for society, because the individual doesn't matter in socialist/communist nations.

But its the vaccine that is saving those useless eaters lives. Its not Ivermectin that has reduced the death rate in America to less than 10% of what it was last year.

We didn't lose millions last year, it wasn't bad like they were predicting. So, if it's less than 10% as bad this year, why are they screaming even louder that "IT'S A PANDEMIC!"

"Something is afoot, Watson."

I don't have a jab clinic, or work at one so no.



a reply to: anonentity

I don't deny that some people have died after taking one of the various covid 19 vaccines no.

It's a known fact and the same as all medications or vaccines or medical treatments. Nothing is 100 percent safe.



a reply to: TrulyColorBlind

originally posted by: Xtrozero

originally posted by: jerich0

They ignore facts, truth and evidence. It's sad, really.

Anti vaxxers are still dying to the virus using Ivermectin

And anti-safeters (pro vaxxers) are still dying from being vaccinated.

originally posted by: TrulyColorBlind

originally posted by: Xtrozero

originally posted by: jerich0

They ignore facts, truth and evidence. It's sad, really.

Anti vaxxers are still dying to the virus using Ivermectin

And anti-safeters (pro vaxxers) are still dying from being vaccinated.

Not pro vaxxter, unlike you folk pushing you antivaxx ideocy, but double jabbed and still somehow alive. Idiot.

originally posted by: TrulyColorBlind

We didn't lose millions last year, it wasn't bad like they were predicting. So, if it's less than 10% as bad this year, why are they screaming even louder that "IT'S A PANDEMIC!"

"Something is afoot, Watson."

We lost about 400k+ not counting the Positive with COVID and a gun shot to the chest scenarios... We were well over 600k total at the end of last year and now we are like 690k, so a lot less people are dying, and a lot less compared to how many of the total infections are going to the hospitals which is about 95% or better unvaxxed people.

Also don't confuse the vaccine with how horrible our Government is running all this. It is astoundingly just how they can make the worst decisions possible.

originally posted by: TrulyColorBlind

And anti-safeters (pro vaxxers) are still dying from being vaccinated.

Not really... Unvaxxed is still like 20 times worst getting the virus.

Dying to the vaccine is pretty rare, but people want to play the same game as those who did it with the virus.

COVID positive and shot in the chest = COVID death
Vaccinated and 1 month later a 87 year-old person dies with 15 pre existing conditions = Vaccine death

originally posted by: Xtrozero

originally posted by: TrulyColorBlind

And anti-safeters (pro vaxxers) are still dying from being vaccinated.

Not really... Unvaxxed is still like 20 times worst getting the virus.

Dying to the vaccine is pretty rare, but people want to play the same game as those who did it with the virus.

COVID positive and shot in the chest = COVID death
Vaccinated and 1 month later a 87 year-old person dies with 15 pre existing conditions = Vaccine death

Let me ask you a question. But, it could be directed to anybody who knows the true answer, so please don't take this personally.

Can you guarantee, on your life, that should I take this vaccination, that I won't be someone who will suffer death or some of the debilatating side effects that people are experiencing? Can the CDC say this? Can anybody say this?

I think any intelligent person knows that that question cannot be answered with certainty.

Now, is anybody still not getting it why people are not wanting to risk their life in this way?

I had covid and had about two days of conditions like a typical cold. How many people have had it and gotten over it fine without being vaccinated? What are those numbers and why haven't I seen them posted anywhere?

People die at home.

Didn't the little 4 year old in Texas die in her sleep at home?

a reply to: Ravenwatcher

The only way to get it is to get diagnosed.

It's a known fact and the same as all medications or vaccines or medical treatments. Nothing is 100 percent safe.

Could easily be 100% effective over time.
But as long as we're dying by the time we find out what's the big deal?

originally posted by: TrulyColorBlind
Can you guarantee, on your life, that should I take this vaccination, that I won't be someone who will suffer death or some of the debilatating side effects that people are experiencing? Can the CDC say this? Can anybody say this?

Well first I don't give a crap if you get it or not. Your choice, I do hope either way it works out for you. All I can say is the actual virus is about 20 times worst, take it or leave it. I know of no one who has had any issues with the vaccine, and that is a lot of people. I do also know a good number that had a hell of a time with the virus and a couple of deaths.

I have had a lot of vaccines, this one was about the least one with any side effects I ever had, same with my family, but then maybe we were the "lucky" ones.

I had covid and had about two days of conditions like a typical cold. How many people have had it and gotten over it fine without being vaccinated? What are those numbers and why haven't I seen them posted anywhere?

If I had already had COVID I would most likely not get vaxxed since I already have the anti-bodies. People should not really down play how serious COVID can be while up playing how dangerous they think the vaccine maybe. I also think young people should not get it too.

They both produce the same protein except the virus does it in a massive production while destroying your air sack cells in the process if your body can not get it under control quickly.

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2

originally posted by: TrulyColorBlind

originally posted by: Xtrozero

originally posted by: jerich0

They ignore facts, truth and evidence. It's sad, really.

Anti vaxxers are still dying to the virus using Ivermectin

And anti-safeters (pro vaxxers) are still dying from being vaccinated.

Not pro vaxxter, unlike you folk pushing you antivaxx ideocy, but double jabbed and still somehow alive. Idiot.

So I do not know anyone who has died from covid (don't even know anyone who has conclusively had it -yes I believe it exists) and I also do not know anyone who has had adverse effects or died from the so called vaccines. What I do know though is that people should be able to choose if they want it or not. But see that is becoming a problem because of misinformation from everywhere but mostly from the Gov and MSM (mainly exaggerating information) This is causing what we are seeing here on this very thread, which quickly devolving into a back and forth insult match.

My take? It isn't as bad as anyone is sayin on either side, the virus isn't nearly as deadly as everyone is making out to be and the vaccine isn't a death warrant either.

Nothing good will come of this until the misinformation on both sides subsides, but that won't happen now will it.

This is being used to divide people plain and simple and it is working beautifully. Sad.

HUH??? 358 children - not babies but CHILDREN - have died of COVID in the U.S.
Don't misunderstand... that is horrible. I'm sure none of us like to see children dying for ANY reason.
But your statement cannot possibly be true.

Children and COVID

a reply to: mysterioustranger

358 children have passed from COVID in the entire United States.
As I said in my other comment - that is still horrible.
I don't - and I am sure most don't - like seeing children dying for any reason whatsoever.
But with that being the total number in the entire United States - and again, that is children... not just 'babies' - it is hard to believe that he is not exaggerating somewhat. EMT or not...

Source

a reply to: olaru12