It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

There is no evidence that COVID-19 vaccines cause male fertility problems, the CDC says

page: 1
8

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 16 2021 @ 12:24 AM
link   
You have the CDC, "The Usual Experts" now coming onto the defense of the covid vaxs after Rapper Nicki Minaj made the claims. Yet the CDC has mentioned nothing on those women.

Who had being reporting of their periods being heavy.




Contrary to myths circulating on social media and to rapper Nicki Minaj's tweets during the Met Gala, medical experts and public health organizations say there is no evidence that COVID-19 vaccines affect male fertility. According to the CDC, professional societies for male reproduction recommend men who want to have babies in the future get a COVID-19 vaccine as "there is no evidence that vaccines, including COVID-19 vaccines, cause male fertility problems


The Experts Say...



The specifics of the claim aren’t clear. A representative for Minaj did not return requests for more information. But experts say there is no data to support the idea that the vaccines cause erectile dysfunction or swollen testicles.

There is no data. Is there a long term data?


Rapper’s tweet shares unfounded claims about vaccine side effects



posted on Sep, 16 2021 @ 12:30 AM
link   
a reply to: HawkEyi

What they mean is ...... Yet. After all it's probably a bit early to say, seeing as that part of the experiment must have only just started, cause they certainly did # all before it went public.




posted on Sep, 16 2021 @ 01:27 AM
link   
The CDC, FDA, big pharma , WHO etc etc all tentacles of the same beast. So, it means nothing whatever they say .



posted on Sep, 16 2021 @ 01:55 AM
link   
a reply to: myselfaswell

Right. The most damaging long-term effects of the Vaccine(s) won't become obvious until they trigger "episodes" in the poor victims.

TV will be filled with;

"Did your employer or other authority compel you to be vaccinated with the experimental drugs in 2021 or 2022?

Are you now suffering from unexplained leg cramps, have had a catastrophic lung, heart, or brain event, or lost a loved one recently to a catastrophic heart, lung, or brain event??

If so, call our legal team and we'll ensure you and your family are properly compensated for the pain and suffering."



posted on Sep, 16 2021 @ 04:47 AM
link   
Honestly I'd rather believe Nicki than the CDC



posted on Sep, 16 2021 @ 08:20 AM
link   
Not a huge fan of her music but I am now a huge fan of her because she has the balls to say something most entertainment sheep don't have the balls to say. Nicki has bigger balls than most men.



posted on Sep, 16 2021 @ 09:21 AM
link   

originally posted by: myselfaswell
a reply to: HawkEyi

What they mean is ...... Yet. After all it's probably a bit early to say, seeing as that part of the experiment must have only just started, cause they certainly did # all before it went public.



Where is Your "pic" from? Link?



posted on Sep, 16 2021 @ 10:08 AM
link   
a reply to: HawkEyi

Wow this mother feckers can not come out about the side effects on children, teens and adults but they are ready to bring their opinions on male fertility.

What that tells you? we are a male dominated society after all,

Anybody trust this son of female dogs? no way in hell, pharma owns over 300 well used in the population medications that causes male dysfunction.

So nope, no, nada, the jab has not proven yet that it will no do the same.



Just take your darn viagra with that jab
edit on 16-9-2021 by marg6043 because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 16 2021 @ 02:06 PM
link   
There is no evidence that the FDA and CDC accept is what they should be saying. There has been little testing on whether it effects males and if there is, the parameters set can exclude a lot of indirect ways it can react.

I do not know if it does or doesn't, neither does the FDA. The article states there is no evidence, not that it does not happen. No known direct evidence does not mean there can be indirect problems.



posted on Sep, 16 2021 @ 03:45 PM
link   

originally posted by: ATruGod

originally posted by: myselfaswell
a reply to: HawkEyi

What they mean is ...... Yet. After all it's probably a bit early to say, seeing as that part of the experiment must have only just started, cause they certainly did # all before it went public.



Where is Your "pic" from? Link?


There is a direct link to the fda.gov pdf in this thread that I wrote. Here.




top topics



 
8

log in

join