a reply to:
robsmith
It's pretty amazing how stupid people are allowed to do all kinds of things, but intelligent people are barred from doing much less harmful or
powerful things.
I have used a certain chat from time to time, every time expecting 'normal people' that I could just have a nice talk with every now and then. Every
time (I know, I am stupidly optimistic) I have bumped into much lower state of consciousness I thought was even possible - so much stupidity, so much
scatological and nonsensical crap, tiny, short sentences (if they can be called such), no thought behind anything anyone says whatsoever.
I try to talk about any topic even a little bit, they start calling me mental or the usual, 'autist' or 'a troll'.
When I imagine these people in traffic, driving a car, I can only be horrified for the people around them. I wouldn't want to even be a pedestrian
anywhere near where these people drive.
When I think of what's normal in this world, then I think that all these people probably drive, it gives me chills of horror.
There's so much to be said for self-driving cars, but traffic insanity doesn't surprise me, after I have figured out just how completely idiotic,
selfish, moronic and robotic most people are. Even well-meaning, supposedly 'intelligent' people rationalize that media would never lie to them (in
their view, media would always lie about everything or tell 100% truth about everything, there's no grey area.. "Did they lie about that volcano, huh?
HUH? What'd be the point?!").
When you look how people just blindly accept the official story about everything, line up to be enslaved, marked (vacc.. etc.), etc.. you have to
conclude there are not that many beans in their jar, rattling around. You have to wonder if they even have a brain, or if they're all just some kind
of robotoids or clones. The term 'cell phone zombie' could NOT be more apt.
People and their phones, it's like they can't put it in their pocket for five seconds, or 'not check' it for ten minutes. No matter what the
situation, it's in their hand, and they're staring at it like it's a source of euphoria (which it probably is).
It's scary to observe these people, and then realize they're the majority.
Of course they will be crazy, ignorant, blind and stupid in traffic, too.. why would they change? It's just scary that these people are allowed to
drive.
The whole 'driving' situation makes no sense, really. Why all kinds of unskilled, pathetically stupid and selfish monsters are allowed to drive, but
when it comes to other - way more harmless - things, suddenly there are walls and checks and blocks and whatnot.
I can never understand why USA allows 16-year old teenagers to drive a car, no problem. A heavy machine you can use to kill someone when your mind is
still just developing and your brain is full of hormones that make you lust, crave and act stupidly - sure, PERFECT age to let you operate this speedy
multiple-tons-heavy metal mass!
But touching the physical body of another hormone-filled lusty piece of lust, or quaffing some kind of intoxicating liquid that would probably just
make you do stupid things that you regret next morning - ABSOLUTELY NOT until you're 21!
I mean, you can mow people down for FIVE YEARS before you're allowed to drink a beer and get a mild buzz.
What kind of friggin' sense does that make? I bet if you take 100 sixteen year-olds and give them beer, then take another 100 sixteen year-olds and
give them a fast car and 'licence to drive' (I won't even get to how everyone has freedom to travel, and you don't need a licence to do lawful
things), the driving teenagers will cause more harm, injuries and death than the 100 drunken beer-drinking ones.
Sure, alcohol can make someone 'lose judgment' and maybe impair growing brains a bit, but you'd have to have very specific circumstances and a lot of
drunken effort to kill someone (unless very unlucky), but with a car, you can kill someone by turning a ring-shaped object one centimeter (with the
'right' timing).
What sense does it make to let teenagers control a massive heavy object made of metal that goes very fast (and pollutes), but not let those same
teenagers relax and drink themselves to drunken stupor and pass out?
Shouldn't it AT LEAST be on the same level? In other countries, drinking age varies, it can be anything fom 16 to 18 to 21, etc.. I am simply
wondering about this logic. I guess USA is such a car-based country that it's considered a core necessity, whereas alcohol isn't.
Even then, 21 is way too high - no teenager is gonna wait that long. Making a teenager a criminal just for doing what teenagers do (let's face it,
they will drink anyway) is just wrong.
In my opinion, if anything, it should be the other way around. Let those teenagers drink themselves silly and when they're matured and have got that
drinking stuff out of their system, THEN give them the car keys at 21 years old. This would create a higher chance of 'sober teenage drivers' in my
opinion.
Anyway, driving is a stupid thing to do anyway, especially using an archaic polluting noisemaker to do it. There's such a thing as 'public transport',
there are such things as 'self-driving cars', there are taxi cabs, bicycles and walking. Why drive? No real reason. In that sense, you can only blame
yourself if you go into the traffic of the stupid people and expect people to NOT be stupid in traffic.