It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: daskakik
originally posted by: Doctor Smith
So I was right all along.
Nope, just someone in your choir.
I guess some just can't understand how nano materials can be organized molecule by molecule.
That doesn't change what they are or how many there are.
You can't make a dress out of a square inch of cloth and there isn't enough material in a .5-1cc shot to hold a magnet no matter how you organize it.
Graphene Oxide Is the Main Ingredient in Covid Jabs Says Former Pfizer Employee
According to a former Pfizer employee and current analyst for pharmaceutical industries, graphene oxide nanoparticles are the key ingredient in Biotech’s Covid-19 shots, the product which is being marketed as a “vaccine”. But bad news from Japan may have an impact on this marketing strategy.
In an interview with Stew Peters on July 28, Karen Kingston said graphene oxide was not listed as an ingredient, because the manufacturers claimed that it was a trade secret. It was therefore not included in Biotech’s patent filing as an ingredient in the Covid-19 shots, since it is purported to be the intellectual property of the pharmaceutical giant.
Kingston explained that while the ingredient was redacted from Pfizer’s US patent due to its alleged status as a “trade secret”, it was actually included in Pfizer’s Chinese patent application.
According to Kingston, the Pfizer vaccine and the Moderna vaccine are essentially the same injection. It is therefore interesting to note that in the July 2020 Moderna patent [US #10703789B2], lipid nanoparticles, the phospholipid, the cholesterol, the cationic (positive ionic-charged lipid) and the PEGylated polyethylene glycol lipid are also listed as was done for the Pfizer product.
originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: SeaWorthy
According to Karen Kingston on Infowars?
Not shooting down your source, just saying.....
originally posted by: SeaWorthy
originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: SeaWorthy
According to Karen Kingston on Infowars?
Not shooting down your source, just saying.....
That was really quick response there Old c
Do you believe they have such tech?
That is available for use?
I am aware there are zero sources that will change your view.
I say good luck to you in the future, I do often wonder though why spend your time on a website where people look past the mainstream information and look at what wool may be being pulled over our eyes. You are a eyes on the ruler kind so it is a puzzle $
originally posted by: PapagiorgioCZ
a reply to: Oldcarpy2
Lotta good stuff you read about on this site was first on Infowars. Sometimes months or years earlier.
It's a mainstream. You can like it or hate it like NYT but it's valid and effective and we love it.
originally posted by: PapagiorgioCZ
a reply to: Oldcarpy2
Lotta good stuff you read about on this site was first on Infowars. Sometimes months or years earlier.
It's a mainstream. You can like it or hate it like NYT but it's valid and effective and we love it.
Josh Owens, who spent years working for Infowars, wrote an essay for The New York Times Magazine describing how Jones' media empire made up facts to fit its narrative and how employees were subjected to Jones’ angry, violent outbursts.
originally posted by: PapagiorgioCZ
a reply to: dragonridr
It's hard to believe you've made 4 idiots to give your garbage post 4 stars. Herd mentality I guess.
Let's open up www.infowars.com... to see if it's close. Nope. Made up. And what do you expect from a fired guy who runs to no one else than New York Times to sell his story. A little back-stabbing traitor full of #. A little undercover leftist Austin Texas is full of.
originally posted by: PapagiorgioCZ
a reply to: Oldcarpy2
It's not like it's some Infowars theory and Infowars thread. I've seen Owen in The War Room reporting on it but he was repeating that he has no opinion. Mainstream media report on UFO from time to time. Does it make them UFO nuts too? Will you discard all of the NYT work and good history because of that?
originally posted by: PapagiorgioCZ
a reply to: Oldcarpy2
So I need to explain you my posts until you reach understanding?
Where exactly are you lost?
originally posted by: PapagiorgioCZ
a reply to: Oldcarpy2
Lotta good stuff you read about on this site was first on Infowars. Sometimes months or years earlier.
It's a mainstream. You can like it or hate it like NYT but it's valid and effective and we love it.
Molecular Biophysicist Guillermo Iturriaga, CEO of Laser Beam Technology Chile, has conducted a series of analyses of AstraZeneca vaccination vials from an external and electronics point of view.
Based on what he has discovered and studied, he wrote an official interim report that describes how he detected electronic components in the composition of the substance that so many people carry in their bodies.
The most shocking part of his research is that these nanocomponents he detected create electric fields when the vials when shaken.
Alex thinks demons are trying to take over the planet.