It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: MDDoxs
Saving the planet at this stage can only be achieved through radical technological development to either mitigate our direct impact allowing the earth to recover or one that directly addresses the components of biosphere that are out of alignment. The former is easier to achieve in my opinion.
originally posted by: network dude
Would you kill to save it? How many would you kill? What if you determined that we needed to kill 70% of the global population to save the Earth? Would anyone be able to do it? How would you get that many people to do something that could kill them willingly?
these are dark times ahead. Best pay attention and look out for each other. make good decisions. The bad man is already planning his next move.
originally posted by: Soloprotocol
I would develop a virus that requires a vaccination that would kill off humans by the billions.
originally posted by: ThatDamnDuckAgain
a reply to: network dude
We don't need to kill. There should be enough hidden patents and secret technology out there, that we, if we would work together as humanity, could utilize to make life on this planet flourish.
Yes we would need to cutback on a lot of things but also produce more sturdy and universal designed machines and tools. Stop the throw-away mentality. Come clean with what we have and then implement it but of course that would not be possible with profit oriented companies.