Dr. Shawn Brooks, vaccinated are not human and will die

originally posted by: RichardTomisonIII
a reply to: game over man

Wonder if it's this guy who had his Ohio teaching license revoked.

core.ode.state.oh.us...

Excellent dig.

Can't confirm.

But still.an excellent dig.


Well done.

originally posted by: DaRAGE
Here is a link to Dr Shawn Brookes doctor and background information.

health.usnews.com...

404d

originally posted by: RichardTomisonIII
a reply to: game over man

Wonder if it's this guy who had his Ohio teaching license revoked.

core.ode.state.oh.us...

Definitely him!! Nice work!!

Insane this guy went viral as the truth....

a reply to: Nunyabizisit

health.usnews.com... got it.

originally posted by: DaRAGE
a reply to: Nunyabizisit

health.usnews.com... got it.

Thank you for the updated link.

Says that brooks got md from nebraska though.

Im free choice... but its not nice to see the cognitive disonans regarding this guys statements.

Right now I dont care if he is right or wrong, but I do xare about the people who automatically assumes he is right based on:

- His own claim to title.... prove it, your word is worth nothing. Anyone can claim that title.

- People saying "I believe he is right because the message he brings resonates with my belief and therefore he must also be what he says he is."

Its the same kind of stupidity people engage when choosing political sides... oh, Biden said something bad about Trump therefore I must like him more.
Oh Trump called out the lying media and said something bad about... well everyone, therefore I will like everything he does or says.

Both zealot groups are occupied by mediocre mental resources. The same unfortunately goes for extreme anti vax....

Remember, this is not a black and white question. Its a spectrum.

So... please supply credentials for the extra ordinary claims, otherwise I could myself just parade anywhere as the Dir. of the CDC in X country and make claims as well...

originally posted by: DaRAGE
a reply to: Nunyabizisit

health.usnews.com... got it.

I don't think that's the same guy...He looks different, lives in Utah, an MD, and different background.

But when you Google "Dr Shawn Brooks Utah Twitter" you get conspiracy posts saying it's him. But if you Google Dr. Sean Brooks you get conspiracy videos that say it's the Dr. Sean Brooks.

Did bots pick this up and repost it? Is bitchute bots? Maybe that explains why Bitchute has uploads of Dr. Sean Brooks from Oxford, PHD, and uploads Dr. Shawn Brooks MD Internal Medicine Specialist?

Bitchute Shawn Brooks

Bitchute Sean Brooks

Hmmm....the conspiracy is getting kind of interesting now.... clearly Bitchute does not care...

a reply to: game over man

But... Isn't he a psychologist, not a scientist?

His educational and professional background is in social science. He is also a long time anti vaxxer, and hasn't been able to back up and thing in his video with actual data.

originally posted by: flice

I do care about people who automatically assume he is right based on:

well...

THIS.

EXACTLY.




Any subject.

Any 'side'.

As much as I am against the vaccine I do know people having babies who have had it.. one even had it when she was pregnant came out fine though unsure if it was 1 or 2 shots she had.. but maybe the booters will do more damage? Or maybe some people have better immune systems to break down?

Be good to see if there is a report on vaccine miscarriages etc.



a reply to: game over man

originally posted by: burdman30ott6
a reply to: hounddoghowlie

The variants seem to be isolated and identified months after they actually appear in a country. They seem to scan existing samples for the new variant and then retroactively identify the variant in an old sample. What I am getting at is that we don't know right now what (if any) variants are brewing in the "vaccinated" and we won't know for another couple of months or more... this is why you don't inject an experimental drug into a massive population, ESPCIALLY in the middle of a pandemic. It is why every previous vaccine has taken years of animal testing then years of discrete testing in selected individual humans before you confidently say the shots are safe and effective for use in the overall population.

Most of the sequencing used to identify the varients happened in the UK, its the world leader in this field.

They identified the most dangerous uk strain, known there as the Kent strain, months before the vax was even out of trials, and then went on to check old sample and retroactively identify most of the main strains that we have today, particularly the Indian ones.

These strains had been hitting communities all over the world from as early as March 2020, but we're only later properly identified.

this is to : game over man

data.tallahassee.com...

I'm guessing this has alot to do with it.

a reply to: MykeNukem
As far as I know, he has a PhD in Education and if from Oxford, Ohio. He didn't go to Oxford.
His books are all related to education

originally posted by: Nunyabizisit

originally posted by: DaRAGE
a reply to: Nunyabizisit

health.usnews.com... got it.

Thank you for the updated link.

Says that brooks got md from nebraska though.

Because that's the wrong DR, The anti vac Dr has a PhD in Education and is from Oxford Ohio, didn't study at Oxford.

a reply to: game over man

We've all heard the expression "two things can be true at the same time", even if they appear contradictory. Whether this Dr. Brooks is a legit Dr. or not, it doesn't mean what he's saying is valid or invalid. Like most things, it's probably not that black and white.

And given today's crazy politized environment and media biased soapboxing for both sides, identifying "truth" is even more of a challenge.

My point is,, applying Occam's razor, it's likely that MOST medical professionals, epidemiologists, virologists, etc. are NOT knowingly/willing participating in any nefarious political plot against humanity. Often they too are just passing along information they believe to be true...even though it may not be 100% accurate.

"not that black and white"...it's also very likely that many of these anecdotal reports (and in many cases actual video documentation) of adverse effects occurring as a direct result of getting the vaccine are in fact true. HOWEVER, some may be exaggerated or even fake in order to bolster the narrative of one side of the argument.

It's also probable that those groups of people in positions of power who stand to benefit from mass distribution of these vaccines, (either financially, politically, or both) will do everything possible to propagate the narrative that "vaccines are SAFE and EVERYONE should get it !", whether they believe it to be true or not. And certainly this would include suppression and censorship of data and legit documentation to the contrary.

"two things can be true at the same time"
The vaccines may help slow or reduce the ongoing widespread of the Covid virus, AND it may be harmful to humans. To what degree either of these are true? Who really knows at this point?

At some point the preponderance of evidence will tip the scales so heavily to one side or the other, it will become unequivocally, irrefutably, undeniably black and white. Time will tell.

originally posted by: NessaMonsta17
this is to : game over man

data.tallahassee.com...

I'm guessing this has alot to do with it.

Yeah it does nice work!

This guy Sean Brooks is a perfect example of who all of these whistle blowers really could be....

Maybe he should be stripped of his PHD next....

a reply to: burdman30ott6

I was going to make a thread about something that happened recently to all my family, and even our friends, including nuns, from our congregation.

My niece is on her fourth year of pre-med. She wants to be a doctor and she got a full scholarship because she has the highest grades in her class. She is in the honor roll. Well, her college began demanding for all students to get vaccinated or they would get penalized and even would lose scholarships, etc. She got vaccinated and after the vaccine she got a really bad cold.

She was down in bed for 2-3 days and was sick for almost a month. When she thought she was better she came to visit us, she used a cloth mask the whole time she was at my home. I wasn't present when she came to my home but my family related what had happened, and my entire family got the same really bad flu. For a couple of days there were no symptoms so we went to church an unfortunately we gave the flu to many in our congregation, including nuns whom are friends of ours. They all got sick after we did. I got infected a day or two later than the rest of my family, and it was a really bad cold. I even passed out completely one day, we had nausea and vomited one-two days, etc. It was bad.

Never in my life have I nor my family been this sick. The nuns were the first one to get tested as well as others in our congregation, and they all were negative for COVID. My family and I got tested as well and we all got negative results for COVID-19. But it was my niece, a vaccinated person, whom gave us this really bad flu. Everyone whom got this flu from my niece were sick for almost a month, and she was sick for that long as well.

I have been wondering if the vaccine caused the flu she got to mutate into a really viral strain.

a reply to: lSkrewloosel

I am more concurred about Early or later on in life. What issues babies who are born with the vaxed families. What type of things the mRNAs might do. They claim that it will boost the immune which i am skeptical.

Bill Gates Had being agaisnt having vax safety commission group.

a reply to: game over man

I cannot speak to his credibility, but I was surprised to find he is absolutely right about the miscarriage rate being 82%.

The NEJM study he was referring to has a table where they attempted to show the miscarriage rate before 20 weeks was 12%. But they included 700 women who weren't given their first dose until their third trimester to calculate that figure.

If you remove those women, the miscarriage rate before 20 weeks is actually 82%!

Link to study