posted on Sep, 19 2021 @ 01:39 AM
My 2 cents worth on this controversy is that I have skimmed all 5 pages of the debunk website pages…much of it was cruise ship, landmarks, bangle
jewelry and camera lens characteristics……debating and comparisons.
One of the contentions have been that the object is basically in the same position in 2009 as it was in 2008. How could this be?
One thing I have not seen pointed at (although I could have read past it or wasn’t worth noting by anyone else) and mentioned, was that it appears
to me that two different cameras were used. If that’s the case, then it is plausible what was being captured was in about same position. Perhaps by
using one model of camera for 2008 and another model of camera in 2009.
Dates and time stamps can be fiddled with………but the displayed layout formatting cannot, at least for a majority of cameras, imo. Alpha Numeric
character formatting is programmed by the mfg's into the firmware of the cameras. Shown below is an example……also notice that the point size and
font sizes of AM i.e. are different.
Now….I don’t know what this object is, but the next question is….how could it be in the same position from one year to the next?
There is no way to tell what the atmospheric or subspheric conditions are of where the object is seen to be located. Conditions such as EMF or auto
wormhole coordinates to appear from, etc.
But since anything is possible on ATS…..it could be a residual sighting event!
Borrowing from the paranormal hauntings and sightings, why not borrow the same idea and apply it in theory for this objects appearance? (not saying
it’s a ghost or spirit)
I’m just throwing that out there……
Below is an explanation of Residual’s in the world of the paranormal:
edit on 19-9-2021 by Ophiuchus1 because: (no reason given)