It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: americanbuffalo1
I'm going to guess this won't pan out. Even the evil lawmakers and policy pushers need doctors. There is already a lack of good qualified medical professionals.
Just make bad to worse
Now that I said that, I might be wrong.
That's what I've been wondering. Do we really have such a surplus of medical professionals in the US that we can discard them over their opinions?
originally posted by: Klassified
a reply to: VictorVonDoom
That's what I'm up against. My state just mandated long term care facility staff to be vax'd.
So, if I'm reading the terrain correctly, it's just a matter of time before they mandate providers
in general. Which means that now I'm weighing losing my livelihood against potential short and/or long
term health issues. Right now, I'm not a happy camper. Luckily, I have some time as nothing's come down the pike yet.
But, they could mandate it any time, so......
edit on 9-8-2021 by Wizzz0001 because: (no reason given)
originally posted by: rickymouse
If I was a doctor, I would inform my patients that a vaccine is available and that they should make an informed decision in getting it. A lot of doctors are skeptical about this vaccine...and they have good reason to be skeptical. This vaccine does not attack the coronavirus, they never have been able to make a vaccine successfully to attack a coronavirus. It stimulates a buffered response against the spike protein, if is not a coronavirus vaccine. That is even how the adenovector vaccines work...notice Adeno and not corona in the name. It still makes a reaction against the spike protein.
Even with that, the mRNA vaccines have to be cut into two injections about a month apart, if they combined them there would be a hell of a lot more bad reactions to get the desired result.
I am not an anti-vaxer, I do have problems with some vaccines but I do believe lots of people need those vaccines that can cause me harm. In the case of this vaccine, I do not think enough scientific evidence is out there to prove it is safe, and it is definitely not safe for some individuals. If they knew how to figure out who was going to react badly to this vaccine, more scientific research may have led to that conclusion, they could have reduced the number of bad reactions. It was rushed too much, it is making guinea pigs out of millions of people.. I know I could have a severe reaction to it from reading lots of pure science instead of the propaganda that is being spread about it.
This virus is not safe nor effective for some people, and not enough research has been done on it to identify the risk groups. Also they are covering up the cases of severe side effects saying they are not related...because there is no evidence they are related. The reason there is little evidence of the vaccine causing damage is because they are avoiding verifying them to make it look safer for everyone. I know I cannot take this vaccine because I researched what causes my side effects with the vaccines and because I know from studying that I am pretty badly intolerant to the emulsifiers in the vaccine. But most people do not have years to study like I have had, trying to evaluate what food chemistries have caused them harm so they do not mistakenly have chosen the wrong chemistry to focus on for elimination. There are not simple blood tests given to test for these chemicals, doctors never test much for problems with propylene glycol, polysorbate 80, and polyethylene glycol. One reason is that these chemicals are in many pharmacutical products....no evidence means they remain generally recognized as safe....GRAS.
originally posted by: Destal
originally posted by: rickymouse
If I was a doctor, I would inform my patients that a vaccine is available and that they should make an informed decision in getting it. A lot of doctors are skeptical about this vaccine...and they have good reason to be skeptical. This vaccine does not attack the coronavirus, they never have been able to make a vaccine successfully to attack a coronavirus. It stimulates a buffered response against the spike protein, if is not a coronavirus vaccine. That is even how the adenovector vaccines work...notice Adeno and not corona in the name. It still makes a reaction against the spike protein.
Even with that, the mRNA vaccines have to be cut into two injections about a month apart, if they combined them there would be a hell of a lot more bad reactions to get the desired result.
I am not an anti-vaxer, I do have problems with some vaccines but I do believe lots of people need those vaccines that can cause me harm. In the case of this vaccine, I do not think enough scientific evidence is out there to prove it is safe, and it is definitely not safe for some individuals. If they knew how to figure out who was going to react badly to this vaccine, more scientific research may have led to that conclusion, they could have reduced the number of bad reactions. It was rushed too much, it is making guinea pigs out of millions of people.. I know I could have a severe reaction to it from reading lots of pure science instead of the propaganda that is being spread about it.
This virus is not safe nor effective for some people, and not enough research has been done on it to identify the risk groups. Also they are covering up the cases of severe side effects saying they are not related...because there is no evidence they are related. The reason there is little evidence of the vaccine causing damage is because they are avoiding verifying them to make it look safer for everyone. I know I cannot take this vaccine because I researched what causes my side effects with the vaccines and because I know from studying that I am pretty badly intolerant to the emulsifiers in the vaccine. But most people do not have years to study like I have had, trying to evaluate what food chemistries have caused them harm so they do not mistakenly have chosen the wrong chemistry to focus on for elimination. There are not simple blood tests given to test for these chemicals, doctors never test much for problems with propylene glycol, polysorbate 80, and polyethylene glycol. One reason is that these chemicals are in many pharmacutical products....no evidence means they remain generally recognized as safe....GRAS.
Wrong.
It's not a "vaccine".
And the legal and medical definition of vaccine was coincidentally changed shortly before the plandemic.
Therefore, your point is also completely wrong.
originally posted by: IAMTAT
This sounds like doctors are being threatened for expressing their medical opinion.
It sounds like if doctors express their own opinion on the China Virus "vaccine"...and that opinion is currently defined as "misinformation"...they will no longer be allowed to practice medicine.
This cannot be healthy.
STORY:
Physicians who post COVID-19 vaccine misinformation may lose license, medical panel says
The Federation of State Medical Boards warned July 29 that physicians and other healthcare professionals could be at risk of losing their medical licenses if they spread COVID-19 vaccine misinformation on social media, online and in the media.
FSMB, a nonprofit that represents all U.S. state medical boards, said any clinicians who create or spread vaccine misinformation or disinformation risk disciplinary action by state medical boards, including suspension or revocation of their medical license, according to a statement emailed to Becker's Hospital Review.
www.beckershospitalreview.com...
The problem here is that...in addition to this being a gestapo-like tactic to shutdown free speech and dissenting opinion...the term "misinformation" is highly subjective.
Now, more so than ever, the term remains open to broad interpretation under quickly changing dynamics.
Many medical opinions on the virus and "vaccine" once called "misinformation" are now being proven to have been correct all along.
Saying the China Virus originated in a Chinese lab was, not too long ago, called "misinformation".
Praising HCQ and Ivermectin used to be "misinformation".
Saying the "vaccine" won't prevent infection or transmission used to be "misinformation".
There are many more examples...but, even that is not the greatest concern here.
We need to see this for the Mob-like threat tactic that it obviously is...
"Nice little practice you've got here--It'd be a shame if anything was to happen to it."
Medical opinion and free speech is being muzzled and controlled...and any opinion that doesn't fit the current official narrative will just be surgically removed from any debate.
In the end...in addition to doctors being given the 'Sophie's Choice' of 'Speak your own medical opinion--or lose your livelihood'...it's we, their patients, who will ultimately lose.
THIS IS WRONG.
originally posted by: rickymouse
originally posted by: Destal
originally posted by: rickymouse
If I was a doctor, I would inform my patients that a vaccine is available and that they should make an informed decision in getting it. A lot of doctors are skeptical about this vaccine...and they have good reason to be skeptical. This vaccine does not attack the coronavirus, they never have been able to make a vaccine successfully to attack a coronavirus. It stimulates a buffered response against the spike protein, if is not a coronavirus vaccine. That is even how the adenovector vaccines work...notice Adeno and not corona in the name. It still makes a reaction against the spike protein.
Even with that, the mRNA vaccines have to be cut into two injections about a month apart, if they combined them there would be a hell of a lot more bad reactions to get the desired result.
I am not an anti-vaxer, I do have problems with some vaccines but I do believe lots of people need those vaccines that can cause me harm. In the case of this vaccine, I do not think enough scientific evidence is out there to prove it is safe, and it is definitely not safe for some individuals. If they knew how to figure out who was going to react badly to this vaccine, more scientific research may have led to that conclusion, they could have reduced the number of bad reactions. It was rushed too much, it is making guinea pigs out of millions of people.. I know I could have a severe reaction to it from reading lots of pure science instead of the propaganda that is being spread about it.
This virus is not safe nor effective for some people, and not enough research has been done on it to identify the risk groups. Also they are covering up the cases of severe side effects saying they are not related...because there is no evidence they are related. The reason there is little evidence of the vaccine causing damage is because they are avoiding verifying them to make it look safer for everyone. I know I cannot take this vaccine because I researched what causes my side effects with the vaccines and because I know from studying that I am pretty badly intolerant to the emulsifiers in the vaccine. But most people do not have years to study like I have had, trying to evaluate what food chemistries have caused them harm so they do not mistakenly have chosen the wrong chemistry to focus on for elimination. There are not simple blood tests given to test for these chemicals, doctors never test much for problems with propylene glycol, polysorbate 80, and polyethylene glycol. One reason is that these chemicals are in many pharmacutical products....no evidence means they remain generally recognized as safe....GRAS.
Wrong.
It's not a "vaccine".
And the legal and medical definition of vaccine was coincidentally changed shortly before the plandemic.
Therefore, your point is also completely wrong.
Well, even though it is deceitful, it is classified legally as a vaccine. I do not agree with them doing that, but that is the way it is. I still would not promote that kind of unproven medical procedure but legally the change of definition makes it so they can call it a vaccine now.
originally posted by: Destal
originally posted by: rickymouse
originally posted by: Destal
originally posted by: rickymouse
If I was a doctor, I would inform my patients that a vaccine is available and that they should make an informed decision in getting it. A lot of doctors are skeptical about this vaccine...and they have good reason to be skeptical. This vaccine does not attack the coronavirus, they never have been able to make a vaccine successfully to attack a coronavirus. It stimulates a buffered response against the spike protein, if is not a coronavirus vaccine. That is even how the adenovector vaccines work...notice Adeno and not corona in the name. It still makes a reaction against the spike protein.
Even with that, the mRNA vaccines have to be cut into two injections about a month apart, if they combined them there would be a hell of a lot more bad reactions to get the desired result.
I am not an anti-vaxer, I do have problems with some vaccines but I do believe lots of people need those vaccines that can cause me harm. In the case of this vaccine, I do not think enough scientific evidence is out there to prove it is safe, and it is definitely not safe for some individuals. If they knew how to figure out who was going to react badly to this vaccine, more scientific research may have led to that conclusion, they could have reduced the number of bad reactions. It was rushed too much, it is making guinea pigs out of millions of people.. I know I could have a severe reaction to it from reading lots of pure science instead of the propaganda that is being spread about it.
This virus is not safe nor effective for some people, and not enough research has been done on it to identify the risk groups. Also they are covering up the cases of severe side effects saying they are not related...because there is no evidence they are related. The reason there is little evidence of the vaccine causing damage is because they are avoiding verifying them to make it look safer for everyone. I know I cannot take this vaccine because I researched what causes my side effects with the vaccines and because I know from studying that I am pretty badly intolerant to the emulsifiers in the vaccine. But most people do not have years to study like I have had, trying to evaluate what food chemistries have caused them harm so they do not mistakenly have chosen the wrong chemistry to focus on for elimination. There are not simple blood tests given to test for these chemicals, doctors never test much for problems with propylene glycol, polysorbate 80, and polyethylene glycol. One reason is that these chemicals are in many pharmacutical products....no evidence means they remain generally recognized as safe....GRAS.
Wrong.
It's not a "vaccine".
And the legal and medical definition of vaccine was coincidentally changed shortly before the plandemic.
Therefore, your point is also completely wrong.
Well, even though it is deceitful, it is classified legally as a vaccine. I do not agree with them doing that, but that is the way it is. I still would not promote that kind of unproven medical procedure but legally the change of definition makes it so they can call it a vaccine now.
Again, the DEFINITION of a VACCINE was changed after decades of vaccines research and use.
It is nothing like the previous definition; do you understand that concept?
It's like me changing the definition of the color yellow to mean blue and then claiming that bananas are blue.
Again, your point, therefore is completely irrelevant.
What is happening is complete lies and deception.