It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
More at: www.realclearpolitics.com...
CNN investigative reporter Drew Griffin interviewed "MyPillow" CEO Mike Lindell about his claim that he has evidence the 2020 election was somehow stolen. Lindell is offering $5 million to anyone who can prove him wrong.
"And you have the proof that would show the actual change of votes?" he asked.
"Yes, absolutely, 100 percent," Lindell replied.
originally posted by: sciencelol
a reply to: carewemust
Hey certain members here should go get this 5 million dollars .
I mean this is their chance to prove it really is all a Q larp. LOL I mean 5 MILLION $$$$ .
Go prove hes got nothing LMAO
The Gish gallop is a term for an eristic technique in which a debater attempts to overwhelm an opponent by excessive number of arguments, without regard for the accuracy or strength of those arguments.
In practice, each point raised by the "Gish galloper" takes considerably more time to refute or fact-check than it did to state in the first place.[5] The technique wastes an opponent's time and may cast doubt on the opponent's debating ability for an audience unfamiliar with the technique, especially if no independent fact-checking is involved[6] or if the audience has limited knowledge of the topics.
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Flyingclaydisk
So, you're going to have to sit through hours of gish galloping and then do what, exactly, to get the bread?
That's the point of a gish gallop.
The Gish gallop is a term for an eristic technique in which a debater attempts to overwhelm an opponent by excessive number of arguments, without regard for the accuracy or strength of those arguments.
In practice, each point raised by the "Gish galloper" takes considerably more time to refute or fact-check than it did to state in the first place.[5] The technique wastes an opponent's time and may cast doubt on the opponent's debating ability for an audience unfamiliar with the technique, especially if no independent fact-checking is involved[6] or if the audience has limited knowledge of the topics.
en.wikipedia.org...
originally posted by: Flyingclaydisk
Does the challenger have to put up $5m too?
Surely there must be some caveat, else every wacko on the planet would take that challenge!
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Flyingclaydisk
So, you're going to have to sit through hours of gish galloping and then do what, exactly, to get the bread?
That's the point of a gish gallop.
The Gish gallop is a term for an eristic technique in which a debater attempts to overwhelm an opponent by excessive number of arguments, without regard for the accuracy or strength of those arguments.
In practice, each point raised by the "Gish galloper" takes considerably more time to refute or fact-check than it did to state in the first place.[5] The technique wastes an opponent's time and may cast doubt on the opponent's debating ability for an audience unfamiliar with the technique, especially if no independent fact-checking is involved[6] or if the audience has limited knowledge of the topics.
en.wikipedia.org...
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Flyingclaydisk
So, you're going to have to sit through hours of gish galloping and then do what, exactly, to get the bread?
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: MykeNukem
He hasn't presented anything yet.
You have to go to his "symposium" to see it. And sit there for hours. And you're going to have to refute every one of his points.
As he sits through hours on ATS refuting everyone's points.
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: sciencelol
As he sits through hours on ATS refuting everyone's points.
Hours? Hardly.
Everyone's points? No. But if I see a point that's worth refuting, I will do so. There are many that are just to stupid to bother with.