Boy this backfired ...Trump is owed over a million dollars in back Taxes

originally posted by: Nunyabizisit
a reply to: Phage


Yes, would likely mean an adjustment in his case.

So the Treasury will be happy.

Probably no payment due though, since I think IRS is still working off debt to Trump from previous over payments.

Is that what he told you?

originally posted by: Phage

It's about Chicago property taxes.

But wasn't that the next big thing they were trying to get Trump on in NY? Saying he undervalued his properties for taxes and overvalued them for loans? It was finally "The thing" to get the orange man, people here were warming up the fat lady....lol

Seems that all came to nothing and now this, kind of funny...

originally posted by: Phage

originally posted by: Nunyabizisit
a reply to: Phage


Yes, would likely mean an adjustment in his case.

So the Treasury will be happy.

Probably no payment due though, since I think IRS is still working off debt to Trump from previous over payments.

Is that what he told you?

Was indicated in documents leaked by left a while back in previous backfire.

No idea if true.



I wouldn't believe anything Trump or anyone else said about their own federal income taxes.

IRS is perfectly capable of jailing folks when neccessary.

Otherwise none of anyone's business.

a reply to: Xtrozero

Seems that all came to nothing

I was not aware of this.

a reply to: Nunyabizisit

Was indicated in documents leaked by left a while back in previous backfire.

Are you talking about that one page?

No. It didn't show that the IRS owes anything to Trump.

a reply to: Phage


If that's the case, then part of 1m would have to be paid to IRS with next year's taxes.

IRS has a form for that.



But really don't care.

Haven't ever seen evidence that IRS isn't perfectly capable of collecting everything owed.

So none of my business.

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: incoserv

Doesn't matter.

It sort of does. Considering the motto of this place.

At least, what it used to be.

I say that comment is off topic. It has nothing to do with the story, which I will be following because it is so indicative of Democratic behaviour of late. If your comment is deemed to be not off topic, neither is this one:

On the Finally! Forensic Election Audit In Maricopa County (AZ) Begins Next Week thread, you said they were doing the audit wrong. Someone asked you, "Can you list all the mistakes they have made thus far?" You still haven't responded after more than a week.

Deny ignorance, indeed. You fail to do this in a lot of threads, including this one.

a reply to: Nunyabizisit

If that's the case, the part of 1m would have to be paid to IRS with next year's taxes.

And the Treasury will gladly accept it.

So none of my business.

Of course not. But the OP is wrong.

a reply to: TrulyColorBlind

I say that comment is off topic.

Then the proper course of action would be an alert.

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Nunyabizisit

If that's the case, the part of 1m would have to be paid to IRS with next year's taxes.

And the Treasury will gladly accept it.

So none of my business.

Of course not. But the OP is wrong.

Agreed on all.

(Tempted to make captain obvious joke)

a reply to: Breakthestreak

Ain't that the truth. I have always had "taxes" taken out of my "earnings", like any "good citizen" would do! (As if I owe them for excistence)... But I never "filed", because I never owed.
Then one day, (years later). I get a leter saying that me, "not filing", is a "crime"! I'm still trying to figure out who the "victim" is.

Two of the years I didn't file? I was "over seas", in "combat",.. having "taxes" deducted from my "earnings". By "law", I was supposed to get all that back. I was okay with that. I never "filed", so they can keep it. (I'm a good "patriot", like that!....)

But under threat, duress and coercion?.. I filed. Guess what? I owe "them" $900. I even get a letter saying that if I don't "pay them"? I could "lose any right to property". Really? Lol!

The 2 years they owe me? Would more than pay my tribute. .... "They're" not even interested in me, "filing".. for the years "they owe" me. And they owe me, 3× more, than I owe them.

It's really hard to take people, that can't do simple math, seriously. ...Regardless of who they work for.

originally posted by: Gothmog
It's Chicago.
They busted broke .
Perhaps they will give the Obama Library to Trump in lieu of payment .

Cook county (where Chicago resides) always over assesses property values, which causes too much tax to be paid.

I have to apply for a refund of the overassessment every year. I bet many do not. Democrats are always screwing those dumb enough to allow it.

Same with the automated traffic tickets. It's OK to ignore them, but many (most?) do not.

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: incoserv

Doesn't matter.

It sort of does. Considering the motto of this place.

At least, what it used to be.

Speaking of things that matter and mottos and stuff, surely this little tidbit deserves closer scrutiny or nah?

originally posted by: Sublimecraft

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: incoserv

Doesn't matter.

It sort of does. Considering the motto of this place.

At least, what it used to be.

Speaking of things that matter and mottos and stuff, surely this little tidbit deserves closer scrutiny or nah?

I do believe you could be a brother from another mother ! Salute !

a reply to: carewemust

Doesn't matter what the level of "government". The power to tax, is a power to destroy...
Modern "Democrats"? Aren't. They do nothing but take! Or complain about not enough giving!

J.F.K. was a "Democrat" and an American.
F.D.R was a Socialist, Commie lover. That hated Hitler. Because Hitler's idea of commie and socialist were the only kind that worked.
J.F.K. would be a Republican today.

a reply to: 727Sky

Hil-la-reeh-ous.

For 4 years they have been yelling and shouting claiming that Trump did not pay his taxes and for 4 years they investigated him on Taxes, so called russian collusion and peeing on Obama's hotel bed, among others thing and they found Zilch.

Now it turns out that the IRS owes him a million. If this does not wake some wokes up then i dont know. Anyone hearing about this should start to think how they have been manipulated and lied to about Trump for 4 whole years (still going on btw).

And yet there is a leftist in this thread acting like a school kid sitting in front of the class "But..but the OP wrote down the wrong state :*( " And attempt to abuse ATS's motto to deny ignorance while he himself showing nothing but ignorance while attempting to detract and discredit this thread at all cost adding nothing to the op.

I dont do twitter but Phage made me instantly realize how this will be handled on there by being a leading example.

originally posted by: Sublimecraft

UFC level smack down.

a reply to: 727Sky

I don't have the link handy but David Samson, ex CEO of the Expos and Marlins in baseball talks about how the teams themselves are a write off. The tax scheme works so much in the billionaire's way it's quite ridiculous.

a reply to: 727Sky

I don't have the link handy but David Samson, ex CEO of the Expos and Marlins in baseball talks about how the teams themselves are a write off. The tax scheme works so much in the billionaire's way it's quite ridiculous.

a reply to: 727Sky

I wonder if anyone has read the article in Business Insider.

The lawyer who filed for Trump's property tax return is one of the corrupt Chicago politicians.

Alderman Ed Burke, the longest-serving member of Chicago's City Council in history, served as Trump's lawyer for more than a decade. His firm originally filed the tax appeal arguing the value of Trump's building had been overestimated.

Burke, a Democrat, helped Trump secure $14 million in tax breaks on his Chicago skyscraper before parting ways with Trump's company in 2018, The Chicago Tribune reported.

Later that year, the FBI raided Burke's City Hall office and he was later charged with racketeering, bribery, and extortion, among other charges.
www.businessinsider.com...

Under the circumstances, a hold may just be prudent.

I don't know how things work in Illinois but it seems that an injunction pending investigation and appeal may just be justified.