the question our leaders seem to be avoiding, why?

a reply to: network dude

What about the new viruses scientists are examining coming from the ice??

What are we going to do about those when they start coming back to life in the lab?

originally posted by: dragonridr
a reply to: network dude

There has been studies done

www.nih.gov...

from your lips to God's ears.

originally posted by: sciencelol
a reply to: chr0naut

Not to mention that as numbers of the live virus increase, so does the likelihood of the emergence of new, and potentially more dangerous, strains.

Absolute lies and fearmongering.

Viruses get weaker not more dangerous. What you just said is complete garbage BULL KAKA

Your wrong!

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: network dude

1.) $48 from Uncle Sam per injection.

and/or

2.) Ego driven test of power over the Sheep.

and/or

3.) The vaccines could be to protect us from a highly-classified threat from beyond Earth.

Where did #3 come from? Not heard that before?

It's cheaper and quicker to get shots in arms than give out anti body tests that require extensive labs, also, nobody knows how on anti bodies last...

Oh and of course.... share prices of vaccine companies are paying BIG dividends.

Covid is actually an alien virus that escaped from a secret area 51 type base in Wuhan?



a reply to: djz3ro

originally posted by: dragonridr

originally posted by: sciencelol
a reply to: chr0naut

Not to mention that as numbers of the live virus increase, so does the likelihood of the emergence of new, and potentially more dangerous, strains.

Absolute lies and fearmongering.

Viruses get weaker not more dangerous. What you just said is complete garbage BULL KAKA

Your wrong!

No you are very wrong. The whole point of a virus is to survive if it kills its hosts then it dies.

Viruses get weaker and more contagious over time and that is the science.

That is why ever human has over 350 trillion viruses in their body at all times. Because they get weaker.

Stop lying through your damm teeth

I know that's what invariably happens but the virus isn't sentient and it's mutations are completely random right?

It has no actual control over weather it gets more or less deadly it's just the less deadly more virulent ones that prosper eventually surely?



a reply to: sciencelol

originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: network dude

Because it takes time for a disease to infect people and to spread.

To get 80% of 330 million US citizens infected by natural means will take years (14 years, if the infection rate that has occurred in the USA so far, were to be used as an example. I know the spread would be faster as it gains numbers, but I'm just using observed infection rates to show the problem with obtaining herd immunity naturally).

In that time, the case fatality rate is about 1.7%, this would mean more than 5 million dead from COVID-19 in the US. This would happen even if everyone got the disease in one day, as it relates to the number of cases.

Not to mention that as numbers of the live virus increase, so does the likelihood of the emergence of new, and potentially more dangerous, strains.

Vaccination can reach more people, faster than natural spread, and has a negligible number of adverse reactions, or of the fatalities that the live disease has.

So at first we had to lockdown and wear masks because it was spreading too fast and now we need to vaccinate because it's spreading too slow?

The US has been in an Rt .9 to 1.4 approximately since the second month of the initial COVID outback so how much higher do we need the transmission rate to be?

originally posted by: nonspecific
a reply to: network dude
It's a legitimate question.

I don't see there'd be much of a fuss if they were talking about an antibody passport for travel and large venues or to work in certain sectors.

I'd refuse that nonsense just as quickly as the current nonsense. It is no one's business, any more than someone's HIV or TB status.

Maybe... maybe... if there was an actual health crisis, then just maybe we could have a conversation about it. A virus that has a 99.9998 survival rate (with proper treatment) is not a crisis. The crisis is the attempt by teptb to manufacture a crisis out of a non crisis in order to push their evil 'Great Reset'.

a reply to: sciencelol
So, a virus is cognisant? aware, thinking..nope! you are wrong. Tell us the mechanism a virus uses to determine it's going forward mutation. I'll wait here..lol

That is an opinion.



a reply to: tanstaafl

originally posted by: nonspecific
I know that's what invariably happens but the virus isn't sentient and it's mutations are completely random right?

It has no actual control over weather it gets more or less deadly it's just the less deadly more virulent ones that prosper eventually surely?



a reply to: sciencelol

Exactly, some mutations work in a viruses favour, some do not.

originally posted by: djz3ro

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: network dude

1.) $48 from Uncle Sam per injection.

and/or

2.) Ego driven test of power over the Sheep.

and/or

3.) The vaccines could be to protect us from a highly-classified threat from beyond Earth.

Where did #3 come from? Not heard that before?

It's been discussed on ATS periodically for the past 3 weeks. A theory from a confused Trump supporter.

Here: www.abovetopsecret.com...

No one wants your actual explanation here.

You keep your logical opinion to yourself and stick to misinterpretation and speculation like a good ats'r



a reply to: vonclod

originally posted by: vonclod
a reply to: sciencelol
So, a virus is cognisant? aware, thinking..nope! you are wrong. Tell us the mechanism a virus uses to determine it's going forward mutation. I'll wait here..lol

Because if it mutates more deadly it cant spread right? That why this delta variant isnt killing anybody.

And remember the delta variant came out in brazil b4 the vax rollout.

The delta variant is killing people.


a reply to: sciencelol

originally posted by: nonspecific
No one wants your actual explanation here.

You keep your logical opinion to yourself and stick to misinterpretation and speculation like a good ats'r



a reply to: vonclod

Whats logical about saying viruses dont get weaker? . they have always gotten weaker that is the science.

How many times has this virus nutated alleady? why isnt everyone dropping dead like flies if it get dadlier.

Logic..

originally posted by: nonspecific

The delta variant is killing people.


a reply to: sciencelol

do you have current numbers?

originally posted by: nonspecific

The delta variant is killing people.


a reply to: sciencelol

No where near as many people as the original huh? or the !st few scary mutations. god you guys are so uninformed .

Viruses get weaker and more contagious that is what they do