The Covid-19 Un-Vaccinated are a Danger Only To Each Other - Authorities Need To Back Off.

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: nonspecific

The World has far longer experience with Corona viruses than with the Corona virus vaccines.

Many of these vaxes us old well known technology. We've been making coronavirus shots for decades.

a reply to: AaarghZombies
Which ones use old well know technology?
Annual flu shots use different tech than the covid shots.

originally posted by: nonspecific
It says could not does.


a reply to: Itisnowagain

Yes because the study was done in 2015......
It says that new vaccine tech should be very closely monitored.

The new vaccine tech is being very closely monitored on a huge scale across dozens of nations and under the critical eye of the population of the world.

Is that not enough?


a reply to: Itisnowagain

I am stealing the pharmaggedon for cash merry go round for use in my waking life. Thank you.

a reply to: myselfaswell

a reply to: nonspecific
After millions have taken it.
And every person on the planet is expected to get it before it has been approved.

originally posted by: nonspecific
What about the economic effects?

Also would the unvaccinated people continue to generate potentially more virulent strains?

I'm not arguing against your point but these are factors that could affect both vaccinated and unvaccinated people.




a reply to: carewemust

wouldn't the vaccinated people be the cause of the variants? If they current strain was still infecting the unvaxed, the additional strains wouldn't emerge, isn't that how it works?

Imagine a potus standing up and saying that around three quarters of a million Americans will die and they won't be doing anything at all to try and prevent it.



a reply to: network dude

originally posted by: nonspecific
The new vaccine tech is being very closely monitored on a huge scale across dozens of nations and under the critical eye of the population of the world.

Is that not enough?


a reply to: Itisnowagain

have you noticed there is little to no discussion on those who have had covid and recovered? Those folks (me) should have natural immunity, which I don't know how the vaccine would work with my body already having the antibodies. That's a large part of the population that is being denied access to data and facts, due to the pushing of the vaccines. Should we understand that aspect of this as well for future knowledge?

No that's not how it works. It can happen but it's far less likely.

The delta varient originated in India where vaccinations were almost zero at the time it emerged.



a reply to: network dude

I've said in other threads as have others that you'd think there would be a big push to do antibody tests.

No idea as to why it's not happening.


a reply to: network dude

a reply to: nonspecific

how does that follow with what I posted?

You asked about Lincoln and a pandemic that 99.8 percent of people would survive, that doesn't sound too bad.

.02 percent of the current US population is about .75 million hard working tax paying Americans.

originally posted by: network dude
a reply to: nonspecific

how does that follow with what I posted?

a reply to: nonspecific

But a part of heard immunity is those already infected and recovered. I'm not sure if you followed the early numbers, but a large portion of the population has already been infected. But I am not a scientist, so I have to go off of the data that we have, and try to learn from it.

They are already asking for booster shots to be approved, so this isn't going away anytime soon.

originally posted by: network dude
a reply to: nonspecific

But I am not a scientist,

Don’t beat yourself up, bud. There are no more scientists. Only scientismists.

To be honest the whole situation on the US is pretty messed up and looking bleak if you ask me. I can't begin to figure it out but it's not my job to do so luckily.

I suppose if you took the number of confirmed cases to date of covid 19 then you'd have an idea of what percentage of the population have natural imunity but then half the population are convinced that the PCR test is giving out false numbers to allow a corrupt corrupted government to take away your God given rights.

You could have a big antibody drive but that's complex and costly and then everyone will refuse to have it as it's a blood test as far as I'm aware and they will all claim it's actually a vaccine in the guise of a test.

Even if they did manage a test no one would believe the figures anyway as it would be from the government and handled by big pharma then reported by the main stream media.

I think your pretty much screwed.



a reply to: network dude

originally posted by: network dude
a reply to: nonspecific

But a part of heard immunity is those already infected and recovered. I'm not sure if you followed the early numbers, but a large portion of the population has already been infected. But I am not a scientist, so I have to go off of the data that we have, and try to learn from it.

They are already asking for booster shots to be approved, so this isn't going away anytime soon.

You'd think people putting their faith in the shots would be happy to resign to one after the other to get through life, and would happily scoff and watch the unvaccinated die off instead of nagging.

I'm more than happy to let people think they can't hack it otherwise do that (their other option is death one way or the other, self or natural) The rest of us, it's our gamble. Any person arguing against that really doesn't deserve much else other than directions to the nearest shot fetish site.

That and Biden literally was just quoted on MW as saying this:

“If you’re vaccinated, you’re not going to be hospitalized, you’re not going to be in the IC unit, and you’re not going to die,” Biden said at the forum at Mount St. Joseph University.

www.marketwatch.com...

Well now. Awkward, eh? Just remember what he said up there -- if you're shotted up, you're good. The next logical move is to STFU and carry on, but I fully expect some dingdong to argue what the idiot president said and how he meant it.

Edit: Point is, this is called "talking out both sides of the mouth". Either you're good and not going to have anything to worry about if you're vaccinated, or they're skipping some info you need and Joe lied above.

Repeating a lie doesn’t make it true. This narrative you keep posting is dangerous and malicious, it only serves to spread ill-will.

originally posted by: AaarghZombies

originally posted by: nonspecific
What about the economic effects?

Also would the unvaccinated people continue to generate potentially more virulent strains?

I'm not arguing against your point but these are factors that could affect both vaccinated and unvaccinated people.




a reply to: carewemustagain with your fear based, ignorant narrative. Repeating a lie doesn’t

Yes, the unvaxxed pose a significant risk of generating new and dangerous strains. India and Peru are good example, the UK also generated a dangerous strain pre vax.

Total misinformation. No science or source, only conjecture. Next you’ll say the earth is flat.

originally posted by: AaarghZombies

originally posted by: HawkEyi
@ nonspecific

Also would the unvaccinated people continue to generate potentially more virulent strains?

You know why variants had shown up? not because of unvaccinated its because there are vaccines and the virus is mutating.

I find it ironic how you blame the unvaccinated virulent strains when these two mRNA vax companies are even booster shots.

100% wrong, Corona virus is a rapidly mutating family of virus. It mutated natural rather than due to external stimulus. The more of it in a population them more risk of mutation.

Vaxxing lowers prevelancein a host population so lowers mutation rates. The more you vax the lower the mutation risk.

This is Corona virus 101, we've known this for decades.

Do you have a source that can provide evidence to back up your rebuttal?

It would make sense given the nature of your comment surely.



a reply to: Neobucket