It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: AaarghZombies
a reply to: IAMTAT
Given the source this could be completly fake.
Has anybody independently confirmed that A this guy is a real person and B that he actually said this? I note that there what appear to be multiple error in the section pasted in, such as what it says regarding mRNA being absorbed into cells.
Are we looking at a 100% fabricated story on a click bait website, or maybe someone with an online diploma in lesbian vegan studies from a non accredited source spouting off conspiracies based on a bad reading of Wikipedia?
I've noticed that a lot of these apparently doom mongering articles come from websites that are the equivalent of secureTeam10.
Note that it indicates name-calling, baiting and activity otherwise labeled as political trolling elsewhere on the site. Not generally hateful, bigoted, mean-spirited or gratuitous personal attacks on fellow members. It's also not exempt from the usual forum expectation of remaining on topic.
The shot has been given to so many people in such a short space of time that it's difficult to say if any spike in anything is related.
originally posted by: IAMTAT
I am curious as to whether or not the 30% of "vaccinated" patients Dr. Hoffe performed the D-dimer test on that didn't show micro-clotting...may have only received SALINE.
originally posted by: AaarghZombies
a reply to: IAMTAT
I've noticed that a lot of these apparently doom mongering articles come from websites that are the equivalent of secureTeam10.
originally posted by: IAMTAT
originally posted by: AaarghZombies
a reply to: IAMTAT
Given the source this could be completly fake.
Has anybody independently confirmed that A this guy is a real person and B that he actually said this? I note that there what appear to be multiple error in the section pasted in, such as what it says regarding mRNA being absorbed into cells.
Are we looking at a 100% fabricated story on a click bait website, or maybe someone with an online diploma in lesbian vegan studies from a non accredited source spouting off conspiracies based on a bad reading of Wikipedia?
I've noticed that a lot of these apparently doom mongering articles come from websites that are the equivalent of secureTeam10.
He's real.
Sounds like you better get moving on destroying this guy's credibility, then.
originally posted by: nonspecific
I think it's a bit late to start destroying his credibility.
He was already doing that himself a few months back by the looks of it.
www.cbc.ca...
originally posted by: IAMTAT
originally posted by: AaarghZombies
a reply to: IAMTAT
Given the source this could be completly fake.
Has anybody independently confirmed that A this guy is a real person and B that he actually said this? I note that there what appear to be multiple error in the section pasted in, such as what it says regarding mRNA being absorbed into cells.
Are we looking at a 100% fabricated story on a click bait website, or maybe someone with an online diploma in lesbian vegan studies from a non accredited source spouting off conspiracies based on a bad reading of Wikipedia?
I've noticed that a lot of these apparently doom mongering articles come from websites that are the equivalent of secureTeam10.
He's real.
Sounds like you better get moving on destroying this guy's credibility, then.
originally posted by: igloo
originally posted by: MykeNukem
a reply to: IAMTAT
They've already relieved Dr. Hoffe of duty because of this.
Then Lytton, where's he's from, hit all time canadian heat records, then 90% of it burnt to the ground killing two people.
That might be off topic but I see a possible conspiracy in it.
originally posted by: MykeNukem
originally posted by: nonspecific
I think it's a bit late to start destroying his credibility.
He was already doing that himself a few months back by the looks of it.
www.cbc.ca...
originally posted by: IAMTAT
originally posted by: AaarghZombies
a reply to: IAMTAT
Given the source this could be completly fake.
Has anybody independently confirmed that A this guy is a real person and B that he actually said this? I note that there what appear to be multiple error in the section pasted in, such as what it says regarding mRNA being absorbed into cells.
Are we looking at a 100% fabricated story on a click bait website, or maybe someone with an online diploma in lesbian vegan studies from a non accredited source spouting off conspiracies based on a bad reading of Wikipedia?
I've noticed that a lot of these apparently doom mongering articles come from websites that are the equivalent of secureTeam10.
He's real.
Sounds like you better get moving on destroying this guy's credibility, then.
Our Government is blatantly censoring, then, destroying, anyone who speaks out about it.
They are doing this to Medical Professionals who know far more than either of us about Covid.
If you're OK with people being silenced because they interpret the same data differently, then, we have no need for Science anymore.
I'm not OK with that.
originally posted by: AaarghZombies
a reply to: IAMTAT
someone with an online diploma in lesbian vegan studies
from a non accredited source spouting off conspiracies based on a bad reading of Wikipedia?
originally posted by: nonspecific
I'm ok with people being called out for spreading misleading or outright false information.
I'm certainly ok with doctors doing so.
originally posted by: MykeNukem
originally posted by: nonspecific
I think it's a bit late to start destroying his credibility.
He was already doing that himself a few months back by the looks of it.
www.cbc.ca...
originally posted by: IAMTAT
originally posted by: AaarghZombies
a reply to: IAMTAT
Given the source this could be completly fake.
Has anybody independently confirmed that A this guy is a real person and B that he actually said this? I note that there what appear to be multiple error in the section pasted in, such as what it says regarding mRNA being absorbed into cells.
Are we looking at a 100% fabricated story on a click bait website, or maybe someone with an online diploma in lesbian vegan studies from a non accredited source spouting off conspiracies based on a bad reading of Wikipedia?
I've noticed that a lot of these apparently doom mongering articles come from websites that are the equivalent of secureTeam10.
He's real.
Sounds like you better get moving on destroying this guy's credibility, then.
Our Government is blatantly censoring, then, destroying, anyone who speaks out about it.
They are doing this to Medical Professionals who know far more than either of us about Covid.
If you're OK with people being silenced because they interpret the same data differently, then, we have no need for Science anymore.
I'm not OK with that.
originally posted by: MykeNukem
originally posted by: nonspecific
I'm ok with people being called out for spreading misleading or outright false information.
I'm certainly ok with doctors doing so.
originally posted by: MykeNukem
originally posted by: nonspecific
I think it's a bit late to start destroying his credibility.
He was already doing that himself a few months back by the looks of it.
www.cbc.ca...
originally posted by: IAMTAT
originally posted by: AaarghZombies
a reply to: IAMTAT
Given the source this could be completly fake.
Has anybody independently confirmed that A this guy is a real person and B that he actually said this? I note that there what appear to be multiple error in the section pasted in, such as what it says regarding mRNA being absorbed into cells.
Are we looking at a 100% fabricated story on a click bait website, or maybe someone with an online diploma in lesbian vegan studies from a non accredited source spouting off conspiracies based on a bad reading of Wikipedia?
I've noticed that a lot of these apparently doom mongering articles come from websites that are the equivalent of secureTeam10.
He's real.
Sounds like you better get moving on destroying this guy's credibility, then.
Our Government is blatantly censoring, then, destroying, anyone who speaks out about it.
They are doing this to Medical Professionals who know far more than either of us about Covid.
If you're OK with people being silenced because they interpret the same data differently, then, we have no need for Science anymore.
I'm not OK with that.
Who decides what is "misleading or false"?
Science doesn't issue Gag Orders, that I'm aware of.
Maybe they should let us have all the information and let us make an informed decision?
We're on opposite sides of the issue.
I don't trust them.
originally posted by: nonspecific
Evidence decides.
originally posted by: MykeNukem
originally posted by: nonspecific
I'm ok with people being called out for spreading misleading or outright false information.
I'm certainly ok with doctors doing so.
originally posted by: MykeNukem
originally posted by: nonspecific
I think it's a bit late to start destroying his credibility.
He was already doing that himself a few months back by the looks of it.
www.cbc.ca...
originally posted by: IAMTAT
originally posted by: AaarghZombies
a reply to: IAMTAT
Given the source this could be completly fake.
Has anybody independently confirmed that A this guy is a real person and B that he actually said this? I note that there what appear to be multiple error in the section pasted in, such as what it says regarding mRNA being absorbed into cells.
Are we looking at a 100% fabricated story on a click bait website, or maybe someone with an online diploma in lesbian vegan studies from a non accredited source spouting off conspiracies based on a bad reading of Wikipedia?
I've noticed that a lot of these apparently doom mongering articles come from websites that are the equivalent of secureTeam10.
He's real.
Sounds like you better get moving on destroying this guy's credibility, then.
Our Government is blatantly censoring, then, destroying, anyone who speaks out about it.
They are doing this to Medical Professionals who know far more than either of us about Covid.
If you're OK with people being silenced because they interpret the same data differently, then, we have no need for Science anymore.
I'm not OK with that.
Who decides what is "misleading or false"?
Science doesn't issue Gag Orders, that I'm aware of.
Maybe they should let us have all the information and let us make an informed decision?
We're on opposite sides of the issue.
I don't trust them.
originally posted by: MykeNukem
originally posted by: nonspecific
Evidence decides.
originally posted by: MykeNukem
originally posted by: nonspecific
I'm ok with people being called out for spreading misleading or outright false information.
I'm certainly ok with doctors doing so.
originally posted by: MykeNukem
originally posted by: nonspecific
I think it's a bit late to start destroying his credibility.
He was already doing that himself a few months back by the looks of it.
www.cbc.ca...
originally posted by: IAMTAT
originally posted by: AaarghZombies
a reply to: IAMTAT
Given the source this could be completly fake.
Has anybody independently confirmed that A this guy is a real person and B that he actually said this? I note that there what appear to be multiple error in the section pasted in, such as what it says regarding mRNA being absorbed into cells.
Are we looking at a 100% fabricated story on a click bait website, or maybe someone with an online diploma in lesbian vegan studies from a non accredited source spouting off conspiracies based on a bad reading of Wikipedia?
I've noticed that a lot of these apparently doom mongering articles come from websites that are the equivalent of secureTeam10.
He's real.
Sounds like you better get moving on destroying this guy's credibility, then.
Our Government is blatantly censoring, then, destroying, anyone who speaks out about it.
They are doing this to Medical Professionals who know far more than either of us about Covid.
If you're OK with people being silenced because they interpret the same data differently, then, we have no need for Science anymore.
I'm not OK with that.
Who decides what is "misleading or false"?
Science doesn't issue Gag Orders, that I'm aware of.
Maybe they should let us have all the information and let us make an informed decision?
We're on opposite sides of the issue.
I don't trust them.
No.
Evidence is just data.
It requires interpretation.
ETA:
- Galileo had an interpretation of the evidence that he saw. He also started the "Scientific Method".
- What happened when they decided his interpretation was "false or misleading"?
You want to take us back to the Middle Ages FFS
originally posted by: MykeNukem
originally posted by: nonspecific
Evidence decides.
originally posted by: MykeNukem
originally posted by: nonspecific
I'm ok with people being called out for spreading misleading or outright false information.
I'm certainly ok with doctors doing so.
originally posted by: MykeNukem
originally posted by: nonspecific
I think it's a bit late to start destroying his credibility.
He was already doing that himself a few months back by the looks of it.
www.cbc.ca...
originally posted by: IAMTAT
originally posted by: AaarghZombies
a reply to: IAMTAT
Given the source this could be completly fake.
Has anybody independently confirmed that A this guy is a real person and B that he actually said this? I note that there what appear to be multiple error in the section pasted in, such as what it says regarding mRNA being absorbed into cells.
Are we looking at a 100% fabricated story on a click bait website, or maybe someone with an online diploma in lesbian vegan studies from a non accredited source spouting off conspiracies based on a bad reading of Wikipedia?
I've noticed that a lot of these apparently doom mongering articles come from websites that are the equivalent of secureTeam10.
He's real.
Sounds like you better get moving on destroying this guy's credibility, then.
Our Government is blatantly censoring, then, destroying, anyone who speaks out about it.
They are doing this to Medical Professionals who know far more than either of us about Covid.
If you're OK with people being silenced because they interpret the same data differently, then, we have no need for Science anymore.
I'm not OK with that.
Who decides what is "misleading or false"?
Science doesn't issue Gag Orders, that I'm aware of.
Maybe they should let us have all the information and let us make an informed decision?
We're on opposite sides of the issue.
I don't trust them.
No.
Evidence is just data.
It requires interpretation.